This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I can't read anything in the first line before "... and printmaker". Why's that? -- KF 23:05, 27 Aug 2003 (UTC)
really ok then
where is his art work?
more importantly where are the sources?
This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 03:52, 28 August 2007 (UTC) °==Personal== I think the information about Rauschenberg and Johns should remain private and professional here. There is no discussion about Rauschenberg's marriage to the artist Susan Weil or their son Christopher. Who sleeps with who isn't relative to an article about his work and likewise John's work. Modernist 02:02, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
I don't know if it shopuld be included because I do not believe that Johns is openly gay and there for it could count as libel. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.99.138.230 ( talk) 02:56, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Although, I realize it isn't important to most, I am curious, how he is identified as Cherokee. His grandfather, Robert was married to Tina (Tiny), who is identified as being a full blood Cherokee. From a genealogical point, Tina is Cherokee, it seems. But, she isn't identified as such anywhere in census records. Genealogy as a study, is of interest, more so since his unfortunate death. (user: gwytutsi; 14 may 2008)
I have been hunting down some of the sources for comments where I see the "citation needed" warning. In doing so, I have discovered that sections of this article have been copied verbatim from various web pages. Is this kosher? What is the appropriate course of action when such a section is found? -- Guillermo Ugarte ( talk) 22:57, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
I've been sick and not up to doing much but will start in again on Monday. Never fear will wade through both articles and see what I can clean up. It may take longer than I'd hoped.( olive ( talk) 01:17, 1 November 2008 (UTC)(
EqualRights. A lot of material in the article has been plagiarized so I am working on that. You reverted to a plagiarized version, I had reworded it. I'll add a reference immediately. Good call on the weasel wording.( olive ( talk) 03:08, 9 November 2008 (UTC))
To add twp cents, - My impression for what it's worth about the Pollock the Bollock blog is it copies material from wikipedia and not the other way around..It's more likely the blog plagiarizes or rather just co-opts material from us and other sites, than vice versa..... Modernist ( talk) 19:43, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
I've removed inaccurate information and will rewrite this tomorrow with source added.( olive ( talk) 04:38, 12 November 2008 (UTC))
I doubt there is plagiarism, although nice work on the article so far.. Modernist ( talk) 19:46, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
There are still some non sequiturs in the article but hope to deal with them soon.( olive ( talk) 17:21, 2 February 2009 (UTC))
Rauschenberg was sued for a 22 year relationship with William E Van Brunt III, who was a business partner, contributer and involved relationship.
Shouldn't the main article mention WE Van Brunt? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Patbahn ( talk • contribs) 00:53, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
Here is the legal decision for that case, in favor of Rauschenbeg, in the event anyone wishes to write up that bit of history...
http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/799/1467/1379123/
-- 23.119.204.117 ( talk) 19:49, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
I'm surprised the large RAUSCHENBERG poster on the apartment set of "Frasier" did not get a mention somehow in this article. "influences", "pop culture references"... something like that.-- 23.119.204.117 ( talk) 19:43, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
I have removed [2] most of the external links as excessive, but was reverted with the note "Please be more selective. Some of these links are fine". Which ones? Vexations ( talk) 18:03, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 23:22, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 20:12, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I can't read anything in the first line before "... and printmaker". Why's that? -- KF 23:05, 27 Aug 2003 (UTC)
really ok then
where is his art work?
more importantly where are the sources?
This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 03:52, 28 August 2007 (UTC) °==Personal== I think the information about Rauschenberg and Johns should remain private and professional here. There is no discussion about Rauschenberg's marriage to the artist Susan Weil or their son Christopher. Who sleeps with who isn't relative to an article about his work and likewise John's work. Modernist 02:02, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
I don't know if it shopuld be included because I do not believe that Johns is openly gay and there for it could count as libel. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.99.138.230 ( talk) 02:56, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Although, I realize it isn't important to most, I am curious, how he is identified as Cherokee. His grandfather, Robert was married to Tina (Tiny), who is identified as being a full blood Cherokee. From a genealogical point, Tina is Cherokee, it seems. But, she isn't identified as such anywhere in census records. Genealogy as a study, is of interest, more so since his unfortunate death. (user: gwytutsi; 14 may 2008)
I have been hunting down some of the sources for comments where I see the "citation needed" warning. In doing so, I have discovered that sections of this article have been copied verbatim from various web pages. Is this kosher? What is the appropriate course of action when such a section is found? -- Guillermo Ugarte ( talk) 22:57, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
I've been sick and not up to doing much but will start in again on Monday. Never fear will wade through both articles and see what I can clean up. It may take longer than I'd hoped.( olive ( talk) 01:17, 1 November 2008 (UTC)(
EqualRights. A lot of material in the article has been plagiarized so I am working on that. You reverted to a plagiarized version, I had reworded it. I'll add a reference immediately. Good call on the weasel wording.( olive ( talk) 03:08, 9 November 2008 (UTC))
To add twp cents, - My impression for what it's worth about the Pollock the Bollock blog is it copies material from wikipedia and not the other way around..It's more likely the blog plagiarizes or rather just co-opts material from us and other sites, than vice versa..... Modernist ( talk) 19:43, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
I've removed inaccurate information and will rewrite this tomorrow with source added.( olive ( talk) 04:38, 12 November 2008 (UTC))
I doubt there is plagiarism, although nice work on the article so far.. Modernist ( talk) 19:46, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
There are still some non sequiturs in the article but hope to deal with them soon.( olive ( talk) 17:21, 2 February 2009 (UTC))
Rauschenberg was sued for a 22 year relationship with William E Van Brunt III, who was a business partner, contributer and involved relationship.
Shouldn't the main article mention WE Van Brunt? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Patbahn ( talk • contribs) 00:53, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
Here is the legal decision for that case, in favor of Rauschenbeg, in the event anyone wishes to write up that bit of history...
http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/799/1467/1379123/
-- 23.119.204.117 ( talk) 19:49, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
I'm surprised the large RAUSCHENBERG poster on the apartment set of "Frasier" did not get a mention somehow in this article. "influences", "pop culture references"... something like that.-- 23.119.204.117 ( talk) 19:43, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
I have removed [2] most of the external links as excessive, but was reverted with the note "Please be more selective. Some of these links are fine". Which ones? Vexations ( talk) 18:03, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 23:22, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 20:12, 12 October 2021 (UTC)