This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Vihaan Direct Selling Pvt. Ltd. is QNet Ltd.'s new franchisee carrying QNet brand name in India.
Source: Copyright at http://www.qnetindia.in/ Also: http://issuu.com/qnet/docs/faq__india Rakesh.goyal2019 ( talk) 06:30, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
I want to highlight that there is a relation between Vihaan and qnet-india. So I want following line to be appended to first section of article:
Vihaan Direct Selling Pvt. Ltd. is QNet Ltd.'s new franchisee carrying QNet brand name in India.
Rakesh.goyal2019 ( talk) 07:31, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
haven't ever seen compensation plan like this before. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paone.avu ( talk • contribs) 12:46, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
QNet is still operating successfully in India and various middle East countries.
14.97.31.38 ( talk) 16:53, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The business model described by you is factually and contextually wrong. The fact that it was illegally banded in Indonesia is also wrong, as Qnet is successfully running this model in Indonesia. There is so much other out of context information on your page,n which misleads people. Find out the details and facts from Qnet authorized people and edit. Don't write baseless facts. Manoj9120 ( talk) 07:51, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
please change Qnet to Pnet Hothothot143143 ( talk) 07:01, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Qnet has changed its name several times.
Companies change their names frequently for reasons such as branding, variations in lines of business, and marketing. In our case, this was done for strategic business purposes. When Qnet was founded in 1998 it offered only one product, commemorative gold coins. As the company added more products to its portfolio and the e-commerce platform evolved, the name GoldQuest was no longer suitable and it was changed to QuestNet and then shortened to QNet. Hundreds of companies all over the world have done the same sort of thing.
Disparaging information about Qnet must be accurate, because it’s in the Wikipedia entry.
We strongly dispute the credibility of the Wikipedia entry on Qnet. But we can’t do much about it: Wikipedia’s policy does not allow a company representative, a PR agency or anyone with a stake in the matter to edit entries. We have lodged a complaint with Wikipedia administrators about the heavily bias of the entry and a debate has been opened up on their ‘Neutral Point of view’ noticeboard, that you can see here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard/Archive_29#Qnet_ltd
Please also note that Wikipedia is not considered an authentic source of information. Wikipedia is a public forum where anyone, even you can edit an entry. Unfortunately this has led to numerous quality problems for the portal which its founder Jimmy Wales admits himself. This has been acknowledged by leading media including the New York Times. You can read these two articles on the subject.
Wikipedia founder admits to serious quality problems http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/10/18/wikipedia_quality_problem/
Snared in the Web of a Wikipedia Liar http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/04/weekinreview/04seelye.html?pagewanted=all
Arunangshu.sakar ( talk) 20:03, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Is the placement of the below information correct as business model? Should this be moved to History or the main section, as this does not seem to be the correct placement.
The 2007 Indonesia case and 2008 India case in the Controversies section are related to fraud charges brought against Vijay Eswaran not QNet or Gold Quest. I contend that the cases be removed from Qnet and moved to Vijay Eswaran's page where they meet notability standards. Blueskymorning ( talk) 17:55, 29 October 2013 (UTC)Blueskymorning
What is wrong about its sources? As far as I can see, apart from qnet's website it's all shoud be worthy. Which one is not good? Vpucik ( talk) 12:28, 30 November 2014 (UTC)"
QNET now is the sponsor of a multitude of organizations. In addition to Formula 1 here is some examples: http://www.taarana.org.my/about-us/ http://www.mcfc.co.uk/News/Club-news/2014/August/QNet-partnership http://www.qiup.edu.my/index.php/about-qiup/our-bckground I think it is important for an understanding of the organization, so I would like to ask experienced members to tell, where is better to add this information. Thank you! Vpucik ( talk) 12:30, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
Where is better place to add some informations about membership in professional associations, such as the Direct Selling Association, etc? I think this should be mentioned in the article about a company that is engaged in direct sales. Is it OK if I mention it in the History section? Vpucik ( talk) 08:24, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
It promotes its products on its website using claims "that would not pass official muster in much of the world."[2] Eswaran serves as a motivational speaker to those selling Qnet products, holding sessions that feature "lasers, dry ice, [and] pyrotechnics".[2]
These two lines have been taken out of context and placed in the first paragraph with deliberate intent of negative propaganda about QNet. Donald Frazier's lines appear in an entirely different context in this original article for Forbes. This is against Wikipedia's NPOV. Anyone reading only this information would automatically assume the worst. There is plenty of other negative propaganda already in the entry that creates bias against the company. This seems like a concerted and continued attack. ( Freudianr ( talk) 11:36, 4 December 2014 (UTC))
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Vihaan Direct Selling Pvt. Ltd. is QNet Ltd.'s new franchisee carrying QNet brand name in India.
Source: Copyright at http://www.qnetindia.in/ Also: http://issuu.com/qnet/docs/faq__india Rakesh.goyal2019 ( talk) 06:30, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
I want to highlight that there is a relation between Vihaan and qnet-india. So I want following line to be appended to first section of article:
Vihaan Direct Selling Pvt. Ltd. is QNet Ltd.'s new franchisee carrying QNet brand name in India.
Rakesh.goyal2019 ( talk) 07:31, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
haven't ever seen compensation plan like this before. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paone.avu ( talk • contribs) 12:46, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
QNet is still operating successfully in India and various middle East countries.
14.97.31.38 ( talk) 16:53, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The business model described by you is factually and contextually wrong. The fact that it was illegally banded in Indonesia is also wrong, as Qnet is successfully running this model in Indonesia. There is so much other out of context information on your page,n which misleads people. Find out the details and facts from Qnet authorized people and edit. Don't write baseless facts. Manoj9120 ( talk) 07:51, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
please change Qnet to Pnet Hothothot143143 ( talk) 07:01, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Qnet has changed its name several times.
Companies change their names frequently for reasons such as branding, variations in lines of business, and marketing. In our case, this was done for strategic business purposes. When Qnet was founded in 1998 it offered only one product, commemorative gold coins. As the company added more products to its portfolio and the e-commerce platform evolved, the name GoldQuest was no longer suitable and it was changed to QuestNet and then shortened to QNet. Hundreds of companies all over the world have done the same sort of thing.
Disparaging information about Qnet must be accurate, because it’s in the Wikipedia entry.
We strongly dispute the credibility of the Wikipedia entry on Qnet. But we can’t do much about it: Wikipedia’s policy does not allow a company representative, a PR agency or anyone with a stake in the matter to edit entries. We have lodged a complaint with Wikipedia administrators about the heavily bias of the entry and a debate has been opened up on their ‘Neutral Point of view’ noticeboard, that you can see here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard/Archive_29#Qnet_ltd
Please also note that Wikipedia is not considered an authentic source of information. Wikipedia is a public forum where anyone, even you can edit an entry. Unfortunately this has led to numerous quality problems for the portal which its founder Jimmy Wales admits himself. This has been acknowledged by leading media including the New York Times. You can read these two articles on the subject.
Wikipedia founder admits to serious quality problems http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/10/18/wikipedia_quality_problem/
Snared in the Web of a Wikipedia Liar http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/04/weekinreview/04seelye.html?pagewanted=all
Arunangshu.sakar ( talk) 20:03, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Is the placement of the below information correct as business model? Should this be moved to History or the main section, as this does not seem to be the correct placement.
The 2007 Indonesia case and 2008 India case in the Controversies section are related to fraud charges brought against Vijay Eswaran not QNet or Gold Quest. I contend that the cases be removed from Qnet and moved to Vijay Eswaran's page where they meet notability standards. Blueskymorning ( talk) 17:55, 29 October 2013 (UTC)Blueskymorning
What is wrong about its sources? As far as I can see, apart from qnet's website it's all shoud be worthy. Which one is not good? Vpucik ( talk) 12:28, 30 November 2014 (UTC)"
QNET now is the sponsor of a multitude of organizations. In addition to Formula 1 here is some examples: http://www.taarana.org.my/about-us/ http://www.mcfc.co.uk/News/Club-news/2014/August/QNet-partnership http://www.qiup.edu.my/index.php/about-qiup/our-bckground I think it is important for an understanding of the organization, so I would like to ask experienced members to tell, where is better to add this information. Thank you! Vpucik ( talk) 12:30, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
Where is better place to add some informations about membership in professional associations, such as the Direct Selling Association, etc? I think this should be mentioned in the article about a company that is engaged in direct sales. Is it OK if I mention it in the History section? Vpucik ( talk) 08:24, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
It promotes its products on its website using claims "that would not pass official muster in much of the world."[2] Eswaran serves as a motivational speaker to those selling Qnet products, holding sessions that feature "lasers, dry ice, [and] pyrotechnics".[2]
These two lines have been taken out of context and placed in the first paragraph with deliberate intent of negative propaganda about QNet. Donald Frazier's lines appear in an entirely different context in this original article for Forbes. This is against Wikipedia's NPOV. Anyone reading only this information would automatically assume the worst. There is plenty of other negative propaganda already in the entry that creates bias against the company. This seems like a concerted and continued attack. ( Freudianr ( talk) 11:36, 4 December 2014 (UTC))