The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about the Protect IP Act, or personal opinions. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about the Protect IP Act, or personal opinions at the Reference desk. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
This article has quite a lot of bias against the bill. Wikipedia itself is biased against the bill, as evidenced by their "important message" in 2012. This needs to be fixed, and quickly. CheeseInTea ( talk) 17:40, 26 April 2022 (UTC)CheeseInTea
No consensus to move.
Vegaswikian (
talk) 07:23, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
PROTECT IP Act →
Protect Intellectual Property Act — The article
was remove back to
PROTECT IP Act by user
David Levy after I was rename it to
Protect Intellectual Property Act — the most correctly title.
Reasons to remove
this and
this revert back:
1. Uncorrect title “
PROTECT IP Act” for Wikipedia. It must be ONLY “
Protect IP Act” to this type of title.
2. Unfull title. Full is “
Protect Intellectual Property Act”.
3. Similar with the next Wikipedia articles:
3.1.
Stop Online Piracy Act — NOT “STOP OP Act” or “Stop OP Act”
3.2.
Copyright Term Extension Act — NOT “COPYRIGHT TE Act” or “Copyright TE Act”
…
etc.
4. Headline “
PROTECT IP Act” is misleading because this article has no relation to
IP that meaning in Internet usually as “Internet Protocol”. --
GleeFil 10:40, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
I believe the following content would contribute to the Business and Innovation section. However, I'm a newbie at editing wikipedia and would feel more comfortable if more experienced eyes checked the neutrality of the tone and appropriateness of the citations. The proposed text would follow as a new paragraph following "...70,000 lost jobs." Thanks in advance for help from the pros!
PROPOSED ADDITION: Making accurate estimates of the economic impact of IP piracy is difficult and contentious.[1] Cato Institute fellow Julian Sanchez and adjunct scholar Tim Lee found the economic models and assumptions used by the Institute for Policy Innovation to be inappropriate, with the resulting economic impact estimates inflated.[2][3] Similarly, the Government Accountability Office was unable to replicate the research methodology of economic impact estimates provided by the MPAA.[1][4] The same GAO report also notes that three frequently cited government estimates of the economic impact of piracy and counterfeiting "cannot be substantiated or traced back to an underlying data source or methodology."[1]
[1]"GAO-10-423. Intellectual Property: Observations on Efforts to Quantify the Economic Effects of Conterfeit and Pirated Goods", April 2010 http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d10423.pdf
[2]"How Copyright Industries Con Congress" January 3, 2012 http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/how-copyright-industries-con-congress/
[3]"Texas-Size Sophistry", October 1, 2006 http://techliberation.com/2006/10/01/texas-size-sophistry/
[4]"Feds hampered by incomplete MPAA piracy data", April 19, 2010 http://news.cnet.com/8301-31001_3-20002837-261.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.172.180.118 ( talk) 23:04, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
The redirect Great Firewall of America has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 11 § Great Firewall of America until a consensus is reached. Utopes ( talk / cont) 06:53, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about the Protect IP Act, or personal opinions. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about the Protect IP Act, or personal opinions at the Reference desk. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
This article has quite a lot of bias against the bill. Wikipedia itself is biased against the bill, as evidenced by their "important message" in 2012. This needs to be fixed, and quickly. CheeseInTea ( talk) 17:40, 26 April 2022 (UTC)CheeseInTea
No consensus to move.
Vegaswikian (
talk) 07:23, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
PROTECT IP Act →
Protect Intellectual Property Act — The article
was remove back to
PROTECT IP Act by user
David Levy after I was rename it to
Protect Intellectual Property Act — the most correctly title.
Reasons to remove
this and
this revert back:
1. Uncorrect title “
PROTECT IP Act” for Wikipedia. It must be ONLY “
Protect IP Act” to this type of title.
2. Unfull title. Full is “
Protect Intellectual Property Act”.
3. Similar with the next Wikipedia articles:
3.1.
Stop Online Piracy Act — NOT “STOP OP Act” or “Stop OP Act”
3.2.
Copyright Term Extension Act — NOT “COPYRIGHT TE Act” or “Copyright TE Act”
…
etc.
4. Headline “
PROTECT IP Act” is misleading because this article has no relation to
IP that meaning in Internet usually as “Internet Protocol”. --
GleeFil 10:40, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
I believe the following content would contribute to the Business and Innovation section. However, I'm a newbie at editing wikipedia and would feel more comfortable if more experienced eyes checked the neutrality of the tone and appropriateness of the citations. The proposed text would follow as a new paragraph following "...70,000 lost jobs." Thanks in advance for help from the pros!
PROPOSED ADDITION: Making accurate estimates of the economic impact of IP piracy is difficult and contentious.[1] Cato Institute fellow Julian Sanchez and adjunct scholar Tim Lee found the economic models and assumptions used by the Institute for Policy Innovation to be inappropriate, with the resulting economic impact estimates inflated.[2][3] Similarly, the Government Accountability Office was unable to replicate the research methodology of economic impact estimates provided by the MPAA.[1][4] The same GAO report also notes that three frequently cited government estimates of the economic impact of piracy and counterfeiting "cannot be substantiated or traced back to an underlying data source or methodology."[1]
[1]"GAO-10-423. Intellectual Property: Observations on Efforts to Quantify the Economic Effects of Conterfeit and Pirated Goods", April 2010 http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d10423.pdf
[2]"How Copyright Industries Con Congress" January 3, 2012 http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/how-copyright-industries-con-congress/
[3]"Texas-Size Sophistry", October 1, 2006 http://techliberation.com/2006/10/01/texas-size-sophistry/
[4]"Feds hampered by incomplete MPAA piracy data", April 19, 2010 http://news.cnet.com/8301-31001_3-20002837-261.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.172.180.118 ( talk) 23:04, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
The redirect Great Firewall of America has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 11 § Great Firewall of America until a consensus is reached. Utopes ( talk / cont) 06:53, 11 April 2024 (UTC)