This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Just reverted some NPOV vandalism:
which was placed at the top of the page. RishiAggarwal 14:11, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
From the article: "which in some cases may derogate (opt out) from human rights laws."
Shouldn't that be "which is contrary to human rights laws"? Ojw 21:16, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
No. 'derogate' is a legal term, referring in this case to Article 15 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which allow a country to derogation from certain human rights in times of emergency (althiugh the decision to derogate is still subject to challenge, as it was successfully in the Belmarsh case). Although no derogation is currently in force, the 2005 Act allows for more restrictive control orders to be made if a derogation is in place. 81.76.121.252 19:45, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
We should have an article and see also it here. -- bodnotbod 17:18, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
It's called the Terrorism Bill and it already has a seperate article. 81.77.146.17 00:12, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
There's a bunch of material that can be included re the annual renewal debates in February 2006:
"In April 2006, a High Court judge issued a declaration that section 3 of the Act was incompatible with the right to a fair trial under article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The Act was described by Mr Justice Sullivan as an 'affront to justice'"
Can we have some citation for this?
Hypnoticmonkey ( talk) 15:51, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:58, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
The section describing the remarkable parliamentary ping-pong calls it a "constitutional crisis". This is nonsense. An impasse was avoided and the bill ultimately passed under the ordinary process, albeit in a single, very long day. No source is cited describing it as such and it is not listed at Constitutional crisis. Hairy Dude ( talk) 13:21, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Just reverted some NPOV vandalism:
which was placed at the top of the page. RishiAggarwal 14:11, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
From the article: "which in some cases may derogate (opt out) from human rights laws."
Shouldn't that be "which is contrary to human rights laws"? Ojw 21:16, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
No. 'derogate' is a legal term, referring in this case to Article 15 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which allow a country to derogation from certain human rights in times of emergency (althiugh the decision to derogate is still subject to challenge, as it was successfully in the Belmarsh case). Although no derogation is currently in force, the 2005 Act allows for more restrictive control orders to be made if a derogation is in place. 81.76.121.252 19:45, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
We should have an article and see also it here. -- bodnotbod 17:18, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
It's called the Terrorism Bill and it already has a seperate article. 81.77.146.17 00:12, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
There's a bunch of material that can be included re the annual renewal debates in February 2006:
"In April 2006, a High Court judge issued a declaration that section 3 of the Act was incompatible with the right to a fair trial under article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The Act was described by Mr Justice Sullivan as an 'affront to justice'"
Can we have some citation for this?
Hypnoticmonkey ( talk) 15:51, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:58, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
The section describing the remarkable parliamentary ping-pong calls it a "constitutional crisis". This is nonsense. An impasse was avoided and the bill ultimately passed under the ordinary process, albeit in a single, very long day. No source is cited describing it as such and it is not listed at Constitutional crisis. Hairy Dude ( talk) 13:21, 23 October 2019 (UTC)