Pope Sisinnius is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on December 25, 2023. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Pbritti ( talk · contribs) 00:59, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
First look: I decided that a short article should be given quick once-over first to find any easily resolved issues. Overall, the material here almost precisely matches the sources in terms of content, though avoids crossing the threshold between paraphrasing and plagiarizing. There are only a few things I think bear mention:
Overall, great work. Grammar and other langiage-related requirements are fulfilled. MOS here appears to match the standards for a GA. I'll be reviewing the references and citations next. Apologies if this isn't done until tomorrow; I received positive professional news that is bad for my availability on Wikipedia. ~ Pbritti ( talk) 20:49, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for your understanding, Unlimitedlead. I lied, I'm going to move on to knocking out some of the other criteria first:
Again, excellent work. Expect the references fully reviewed tonight or tomorrow (US time). ~ Pbritti ( talk) 22:11, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Ok, @ Unlimitedlead: lets hit the first two criteria last:
By birth, Sisinnius. However, these are very minor recommendations and Criteria 1 is fulfilled in full as it stands right now.
Alright, that's my review according to the criteria. Feel free to respond to any of the suggestions and recommendations I've made with "No thanks, I'm good"; I am willing to pass this article as is! ~ Pbritti ( talk) 22:32, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
I've decided to keep tabs on this article now that Unlimitedlead has successfully brought it to GA status. I see they intend to bring it to FA status (with a peer review along the way!). Since I'm not at that level of expertise yet, I'm going to simply offer additional sources and descriptions of their utility when I encounter them. The first of these is "The Papacy and Byzantium in the Seventh- and Early Eighth-Century Sections of the Liber Pontificalis" by Rosamond McKitterick (accessible at JSTOR 24780066). Page 256 references Sisinnius's entry in the Liber Pontificalis as "Life 89" and notes that the length of the vacancy following his death is recorded, a fact not currently mentioned in the article. It's minor, but it's something. ~ Pbritti ( talk) 22:00, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
Bruxton (
talk) 23:03, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by Unlimitedlead ( talk). Nominated by Onegreatjoke ( talk) at 22:21, 14 June 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Pope Sisinnius; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
This is very strange. Can anyone explain how a Syrian of the time can have acquired the English name John? Barefoot through the chollas ( talk) 20:34, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
Pope Sisinnius is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on December 25, 2023. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Pbritti ( talk · contribs) 00:59, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
First look: I decided that a short article should be given quick once-over first to find any easily resolved issues. Overall, the material here almost precisely matches the sources in terms of content, though avoids crossing the threshold between paraphrasing and plagiarizing. There are only a few things I think bear mention:
Overall, great work. Grammar and other langiage-related requirements are fulfilled. MOS here appears to match the standards for a GA. I'll be reviewing the references and citations next. Apologies if this isn't done until tomorrow; I received positive professional news that is bad for my availability on Wikipedia. ~ Pbritti ( talk) 20:49, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for your understanding, Unlimitedlead. I lied, I'm going to move on to knocking out some of the other criteria first:
Again, excellent work. Expect the references fully reviewed tonight or tomorrow (US time). ~ Pbritti ( talk) 22:11, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Ok, @ Unlimitedlead: lets hit the first two criteria last:
By birth, Sisinnius. However, these are very minor recommendations and Criteria 1 is fulfilled in full as it stands right now.
Alright, that's my review according to the criteria. Feel free to respond to any of the suggestions and recommendations I've made with "No thanks, I'm good"; I am willing to pass this article as is! ~ Pbritti ( talk) 22:32, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
I've decided to keep tabs on this article now that Unlimitedlead has successfully brought it to GA status. I see they intend to bring it to FA status (with a peer review along the way!). Since I'm not at that level of expertise yet, I'm going to simply offer additional sources and descriptions of their utility when I encounter them. The first of these is "The Papacy and Byzantium in the Seventh- and Early Eighth-Century Sections of the Liber Pontificalis" by Rosamond McKitterick (accessible at JSTOR 24780066). Page 256 references Sisinnius's entry in the Liber Pontificalis as "Life 89" and notes that the length of the vacancy following his death is recorded, a fact not currently mentioned in the article. It's minor, but it's something. ~ Pbritti ( talk) 22:00, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
Bruxton (
talk) 23:03, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by Unlimitedlead ( talk). Nominated by Onegreatjoke ( talk) at 22:21, 14 June 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Pope Sisinnius; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
This is very strange. Can anyone explain how a Syrian of the time can have acquired the English name John? Barefoot through the chollas ( talk) 20:34, 25 December 2023 (UTC)