This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Political Party for Basic Income article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article was nominated for deletion on 6 November 2020. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
It has been proposed in this section that
Political Party for Basic Income be
renamed and moved to
Politieke Partij voor Basisinkomen. A bot will list this discussion on requested moves' current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{
subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{
requested move/dated}} directly. |
Political Party for Basic Income → Politieke Partij voor Basisinkomen – Per WP:DONTUSEENGLISH, no widespread usage (if any) of this translation in English-language sources. Tristan Surtel ( talk) 21:56, 28 March 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal ( talk) 04:50, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
If there are too few reliable English-language sources to constitute an established usage, follow the conventions of the language appropriate to the subject. As for the passage in UE that 162 etc cites, my interpretation is that it discusses situations where a foreign term is consistently translated, but where there is no English-language COMMONNAME because multiple different translations are used. (Regardless of how this RM turns out, I agree that a broader discussion will be helpful for identifying a clearer read on what the policy actually calls for.) ModernDayTrilobite ( talk • contribs) 15:04, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
If there are too few reliable English-language sources to constitute an established usage, follow the conventions of the language appropriate to the subject (German for German politicians, Portuguese for Brazilian towns, and so on).SportingFlyer T· C 06:02, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Political Party for Basic Income article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article was nominated for deletion on 6 November 2020. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
It has been proposed in this section that
Political Party for Basic Income be
renamed and moved to
Politieke Partij voor Basisinkomen. A bot will list this discussion on requested moves' current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{
subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{
requested move/dated}} directly. |
Political Party for Basic Income → Politieke Partij voor Basisinkomen – Per WP:DONTUSEENGLISH, no widespread usage (if any) of this translation in English-language sources. Tristan Surtel ( talk) 21:56, 28 March 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal ( talk) 04:50, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
If there are too few reliable English-language sources to constitute an established usage, follow the conventions of the language appropriate to the subject. As for the passage in UE that 162 etc cites, my interpretation is that it discusses situations where a foreign term is consistently translated, but where there is no English-language COMMONNAME because multiple different translations are used. (Regardless of how this RM turns out, I agree that a broader discussion will be helpful for identifying a clearer read on what the policy actually calls for.) ModernDayTrilobite ( talk • contribs) 15:04, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
If there are too few reliable English-language sources to constitute an established usage, follow the conventions of the language appropriate to the subject (German for German politicians, Portuguese for Brazilian towns, and so on).SportingFlyer T· C 06:02, 7 April 2024 (UTC)