Disambiguation | ||||
|
I think this is the best location for the Land of Punt & Puntite re-directions to point to. Does anyone else care which headding the article sould be under? Zestauferov 05:35, 8 Jan 2004 (UTC)
Should Phoenicia or Punic be mentioned here? //
Anthony Appleyard 16:19, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Maybe not because I think Canaan comes from an Afro-Asiatic word meaning Merchant, I could try to confirm this. I do know that the last I heard, Lebanese school children still learn that their Poenician ancestors came from the Eritrean Sea, so maybe Flinders Petrie's confusion (as it has been put above) has some pre-historic basis. 81.132.98.240 11:45, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Phut (and the related form Put) has absolutely nothing to do with either Punt or Phoenicia. Moreover, Punt and Phoencia have nothing to do with each other either. From the history of this article it looks as if it started life as someone's misunderstanding of "Punt" and/or the heavy use of 19th century sources. I see no reason why this article should not be deleated as it has no factual information whatsoever and mistakenly pulls together 3 distinct topics. — Nefertum17 19:08, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
"Poenit" is not mentioned on either linked article. But citation requests are not appropriate on disambiguation pages. Probably this disambiguation page should be deleted if the appropriate information cannot be added to the linked articles. -- JHunterJ ( talk) 18:50, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
Disambiguation | ||||
|
I think this is the best location for the Land of Punt & Puntite re-directions to point to. Does anyone else care which headding the article sould be under? Zestauferov 05:35, 8 Jan 2004 (UTC)
Should Phoenicia or Punic be mentioned here? //
Anthony Appleyard 16:19, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Maybe not because I think Canaan comes from an Afro-Asiatic word meaning Merchant, I could try to confirm this. I do know that the last I heard, Lebanese school children still learn that their Poenician ancestors came from the Eritrean Sea, so maybe Flinders Petrie's confusion (as it has been put above) has some pre-historic basis. 81.132.98.240 11:45, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Phut (and the related form Put) has absolutely nothing to do with either Punt or Phoenicia. Moreover, Punt and Phoencia have nothing to do with each other either. From the history of this article it looks as if it started life as someone's misunderstanding of "Punt" and/or the heavy use of 19th century sources. I see no reason why this article should not be deleated as it has no factual information whatsoever and mistakenly pulls together 3 distinct topics. — Nefertum17 19:08, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
"Poenit" is not mentioned on either linked article. But citation requests are not appropriate on disambiguation pages. Probably this disambiguation page should be deleted if the appropriate information cannot be added to the linked articles. -- JHunterJ ( talk) 18:50, 7 May 2010 (UTC)