From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

After searching, I see that Pear Deck is a notable piece of software. Please fill in a stub's worth of information, and a few sources to avoid deletion.  superβεεcat  19:57, 2 February 2016 (UTC) reply

Note that I've move User:Rubychili2005's article Peardeck here. -  superβεεcat  20:00, 2 February 2016 (UTC) reply

While short, I don't think this article meets Speedy A7, because: "Any statement which plausibly indicates that additional research (possibly offline, possibly in specialized sources) has a reasonable chance of demonstrating notability is a claim of significance." A simple G-Search shows this is not the case. I think a Prod, or AfD would be more appropriate, if the author fails to expand and source.  superβεεcat  21:57, 2 February 2016 (UTC) reply

AfD

Does not fit WP:NOTABILITY and should be deleted. 209.82.165.136 ( talk) 18:15, 21 April 2022 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

After searching, I see that Pear Deck is a notable piece of software. Please fill in a stub's worth of information, and a few sources to avoid deletion.  superβεεcat  19:57, 2 February 2016 (UTC) reply

Note that I've move User:Rubychili2005's article Peardeck here. -  superβεεcat  20:00, 2 February 2016 (UTC) reply

While short, I don't think this article meets Speedy A7, because: "Any statement which plausibly indicates that additional research (possibly offline, possibly in specialized sources) has a reasonable chance of demonstrating notability is a claim of significance." A simple G-Search shows this is not the case. I think a Prod, or AfD would be more appropriate, if the author fails to expand and source.  superβεεcat  21:57, 2 February 2016 (UTC) reply

AfD

Does not fit WP:NOTABILITY and should be deleted. 209.82.165.136 ( talk) 18:15, 21 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook