 | This article was nominated for deletion on 3 February 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
conflict of interest,
autobiography, and
neutral point of view.
|
Which of the games on this list were actually designed by Pelling, and which were ports of games that were written by others? They should be separated out. -- El on ka 22:18, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
- Hi Elonka, it doesn't really matter because Wikipedia editors recommended the list be deleted. :-( Nickpelling ( talk) 14:10, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
I've removed the information pertaining to Voynich as he is not a notable scholar for this crypto-document. However I'm retaining information relating to his game development career as his coining the term "gamification" gives some weight to the games he made. Simonm223 ( talk) 14:41, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
- Can you please point me at some Voynich scholars who you would consider notable? I'd be fascinated to see your list.
Nickpelling (
talk) 21:48, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
- Maybe
Stephen Bax - but that'd be about it. Because, frankly, most of the media doesn't care enough about one coded book to pay any attention; which makes
WP:RS hard to establish.
Simonm223 (
talk) 21:54, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
- You must therefore be aware that the Voynich Manuscript has received an enormous amount of media attention over the last two months, which suggests the opposite of what you're claiming. Similarly, my book "The Curse of the Voynich" received a favourable 2007 review in Cryptologia by Augusto Buonofalce - http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01611190701244541?journalCode=ucry20#.UyQuLGdF1aQ - and was subsequently cited in a 2008 Cryptologia article - http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01611190701756585#.UyQu8mdF1aQ . Hence I suspect you're being a bit selective, and possibly a bit mean-spirited: a single sentence (or indeed clause) mentioning my decade-long Voynich research would hardly make this some kind of vanity bio. Nickpelling ( talk) 10:47, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
- Maybe
Stephen Bax - but that'd be about it. Because, frankly, most of the media doesn't care enough about one coded book to pay any attention; which makes
WP:RS hard to establish.
Simonm223 (
talk) 21:54, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
- Can you please point me at some Voynich scholars who you would consider notable? I'd be fascinated to see your list.
Nickpelling (
talk) 21:48, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
In addition to the 1987 A & B Computing interview, a more recent one exists but it seems to be WP:SPS. Therefore, it'd be questionable to include it as a reference here. Having said that, if the subject is able to authenticate the contents then perhaps it could be used after all. -- Trevj ( talk · contribs) 03:04, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
Actually reviewing the sources in the AfD, none of the ones that claim he coined "gamification" look reliable. Very sparse reliable sourcing here.
czar 05:50, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Was this written by Nick himself why is this article up? He certainly didnt develop all those games by himself — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.27.84.205 ( talk) 01:01, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
|
| This article was nominated for deletion on 3 February 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
conflict of interest,
autobiography, and
neutral point of view.
|
Which of the games on this list were actually designed by Pelling, and which were ports of games that were written by others? They should be separated out. -- El on ka 22:18, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
- Hi Elonka, it doesn't really matter because Wikipedia editors recommended the list be deleted. :-( Nickpelling ( talk) 14:10, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
I've removed the information pertaining to Voynich as he is not a notable scholar for this crypto-document. However I'm retaining information relating to his game development career as his coining the term "gamification" gives some weight to the games he made. Simonm223 ( talk) 14:41, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
- Can you please point me at some Voynich scholars who you would consider notable? I'd be fascinated to see your list.
Nickpelling (
talk) 21:48, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
- Maybe
Stephen Bax - but that'd be about it. Because, frankly, most of the media doesn't care enough about one coded book to pay any attention; which makes
WP:RS hard to establish.
Simonm223 (
talk) 21:54, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
- You must therefore be aware that the Voynich Manuscript has received an enormous amount of media attention over the last two months, which suggests the opposite of what you're claiming. Similarly, my book "The Curse of the Voynich" received a favourable 2007 review in Cryptologia by Augusto Buonofalce - http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01611190701244541?journalCode=ucry20#.UyQuLGdF1aQ - and was subsequently cited in a 2008 Cryptologia article - http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01611190701756585#.UyQu8mdF1aQ . Hence I suspect you're being a bit selective, and possibly a bit mean-spirited: a single sentence (or indeed clause) mentioning my decade-long Voynich research would hardly make this some kind of vanity bio. Nickpelling ( talk) 10:47, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
- Maybe
Stephen Bax - but that'd be about it. Because, frankly, most of the media doesn't care enough about one coded book to pay any attention; which makes
WP:RS hard to establish.
Simonm223 (
talk) 21:54, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
- Can you please point me at some Voynich scholars who you would consider notable? I'd be fascinated to see your list.
Nickpelling (
talk) 21:48, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
In addition to the 1987 A & B Computing interview, a more recent one exists but it seems to be WP:SPS. Therefore, it'd be questionable to include it as a reference here. Having said that, if the subject is able to authenticate the contents then perhaps it could be used after all. -- Trevj ( talk · contribs) 03:04, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
Actually reviewing the sources in the AfD, none of the ones that claim he coined "gamification" look reliable. Very sparse reliable sourcing here.
czar 05:50, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Was this written by Nick himself why is this article up? He certainly didnt develop all those games by himself — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.27.84.205 ( talk) 01:01, 1 February 2021 (UTC)