This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from N661US appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 27 April 2024, and was viewed approximately 8,985 times (
disclaimer) (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
The result was: promoted by
PrimalMustelid
talk 12:30, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Created by RickyCourtney ( talk). Self-nominated at 19:18, 16 March 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/N661US; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook eligibility:
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
Adequate sourcing: the second paragraph in the "Northwest Airlines Flight 85" section lacks any citations, so this holds up the nomination. Also, there is at least one fact in the lead section that is I cannot find supported anywhere in the body: "The problem was blamed on metal fatigue". The entire last paragraph is supported by a dead link, but I am assuming good faith on that. Other: This doesn't hold up the nomination, but the first sentence of the lead section is pretty confusing. I highly recommend rewriting it. Hook: ALT1 is too long, so I wrote out ALT2, which is still supported by in-line citations in the article. I didn't check the citation for the original hook. Conclusion If you like my ALT2 hook and you take care of the two issues on adequate sourcing, then this nomination will be good to proceed.
Dugan Murphy (
talk) 17:06, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
See above a proposed amended version of ALT2, which should be somewhat clearer. Onceinawhile ( talk) 17:00, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
. When I discussed a nominator approving a reviewers it was agreed that that runs afoul of the rule. Bruxton ( talk) 22:24, 12 April 2024 (UTC)You're not allowed to approve your own hook
Do I even need to say any more? The Total hours (flown) is not '61 million' - that would require staying in the air, 24 hours a day, for almost 7,000 years.
I tried editing the Infobox, but it appears that is beyond my novice capabilities. As this is a very recently published article, I'm sure the original editor is lurking nearby, ready to change the line to Total miles flown = 61 million (as mentioned above) WendlingCrusader ( talk) 13:22, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 08:24, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from N661US appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 27 April 2024, and was viewed approximately 8,985 times (
disclaimer) (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
The result was: promoted by
PrimalMustelid
talk 12:30, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Created by RickyCourtney ( talk). Self-nominated at 19:18, 16 March 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/N661US; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook eligibility:
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
Adequate sourcing: the second paragraph in the "Northwest Airlines Flight 85" section lacks any citations, so this holds up the nomination. Also, there is at least one fact in the lead section that is I cannot find supported anywhere in the body: "The problem was blamed on metal fatigue". The entire last paragraph is supported by a dead link, but I am assuming good faith on that. Other: This doesn't hold up the nomination, but the first sentence of the lead section is pretty confusing. I highly recommend rewriting it. Hook: ALT1 is too long, so I wrote out ALT2, which is still supported by in-line citations in the article. I didn't check the citation for the original hook. Conclusion If you like my ALT2 hook and you take care of the two issues on adequate sourcing, then this nomination will be good to proceed.
Dugan Murphy (
talk) 17:06, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
See above a proposed amended version of ALT2, which should be somewhat clearer. Onceinawhile ( talk) 17:00, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
. When I discussed a nominator approving a reviewers it was agreed that that runs afoul of the rule. Bruxton ( talk) 22:24, 12 April 2024 (UTC)You're not allowed to approve your own hook
Do I even need to say any more? The Total hours (flown) is not '61 million' - that would require staying in the air, 24 hours a day, for almost 7,000 years.
I tried editing the Infobox, but it appears that is beyond my novice capabilities. As this is a very recently published article, I'm sure the original editor is lurking nearby, ready to change the line to Total miles flown = 61 million (as mentioned above) WendlingCrusader ( talk) 13:22, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 08:24, 10 April 2024 (UTC)