This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Microsoft Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to Microsoft on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrosoftWikipedia:WikiProject MicrosoftTemplate:WikiProject MicrosoftMicrosoft articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Translation studies Low‑importance This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Translation Studies, a collaborative effort to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Translation Studies. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of objectives.Translation studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Translation studiesTemplate:WikiProject Translation studiesTranslation studies articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers. This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist. [[Bing (search engine)#Instant answers|Bing Instant Answers]] The anchor (#Instant answers) has been deleted by other users before. Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Hi.

In terms of notability, Bing Translator is in trouble, being just a user interface and no more. Virtually all its sources are primary. As for its size, its readable prose size is 1.5 KB; therefore, WP:SIZERULE suggests a merger.

Best regards,
Codename Lisa ( talk) 12:19, 20 December 2014 (UTC) reply

Support it's merely a website and a couple of applications, officially Microsoft markets it as the Microsoft Translator and all the links from the Bing Translator site link to the Microsoft Translator it's hardly notable by itself I'd suggest migrating the content from this page and just make it the Microsoft Translator § Bing Translator, and while we're at it the Skype Translator could also be merged with the Microsoft Translator, though if you have any reasons why the latter shouldn't please tell.

Sincerely, -- Namlong618 ( talk) 09:47, 11 February 2015 (UTC) reply

Comment if the pages will be merged I suggest that the Bing Translator's infobox, favicon (logo), and content should be integrated and get its own section, and the Bing template should be placed bellow the Microsoft Translator article, the merger shouldn't mean that any content or sources should get lost as I've witnessed in a few other mergers.

Sincerely, -- Namlong618 ( talk) 14:52, 11 February 2015 (UTC) reply

Oppose as Bing translator and skype Translator are implementations of microsoft translator and serve different functions websites are rarely merged with the underlying APIs. -- Lumia930uploader ( talk) 08:14, 11 April 2015 (UTC) reply