This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Chemistry Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

4/18/16. RandalwikiM has challenged a producer of supplements on the size and safety of the microcrystalline cellulose in their products. He is awaiting their response. ;) — Preceding unsigned comment added by RandalwikiM ( talk • contribs) 04:11, 19 April 2016 (UTC) reply

I have added a link to original research done for a patient in 2012. You may call or write the clinic to verify this information (I presume, I did not ask permission). I have removed the "ideal excipient" sentence since possible allergic reactions are not ideal. I DO have permission from the patient. Jenkstom ( talk) 15:01, 23 March 2017 (UTC) reply

'ideal excipient' paragraph is unclear Information

It's not made clear how (or even if) the properties listed make it an 'ideal' excipient. 'ideal' also implies optimality, so it should be stated why it fulfills the requirements of an excipient.

Xbao ( talk) 00:37, 12 February 2015 (UTC) reply

Citing a single mention of an allergic reaction inside its own section has no place in the article imho. Singulary ( talk) 15:31, 4 March 2022 (UTC) reply