This
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on May 1968 events in France. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:23, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
Sous les pavés, la plage!
-Under the paving stones, the beach! -Beneath the pavement, the beach! -Under the paving stones you'll find sand! -Under the paving stones, the clear path to the beach!
Which is the best non litteral translation? Say in the article, it's the Parisian pavement of the streets, and the pavement stones were put out of the pavement and used as weapons by rioters. And they have been removed since this time, and replaced by concrete pavement to avoid this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.91.248.85 ( talk) 08:37, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Moved to May 68. Consensus to move the page away from its current title is clear; there is some disagreement as to the best target, but May 68 has the most support, and is stylistically distinct enough to serve as the primary topic of that term. BD2412 T 20:05, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
May 1968 events in France → ? – I don't know why the title uses the vaguely noncommittal events when the lead sentence tells us that the article is about a specific period of civil unrest.
Civil unrest encompasses such things as "demonstrations, major general strikes, and occupations of universities and factories". As a more
descriptive title, I would suggest
May 1968 French unrest or
French unrest of 1968, though other suggestions are also welcome.
Sangdeboeuf (
talk) 11:46, 15 October 2019 (UTC) --Relisting.
No such user (
talk) 12:05, 23 October 2019 (UTC) —Relisted.
P. I. Ellsworth,
ed.
put'r there 16:36, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
{{
ping}}
)
czar 13:24, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
social consciousness and activism ... history and philosophy. The English word events doesn't have any such philosophical significance that I know of, so Foucault's use of the term in French seems irrelevant. — Sangdeboeuf ( talk) 02:00, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
the event [...] is not a particular being that can be pinned down and identified in space and time [...] For Foucault, the event is [...] a kind of relational being, an outstanding and unsettled matter, which appears as it establishes connections across time and space(p. 88). Not only is this a highly idiosyncratic use of the word and therefore fairly abstruse jargon, it doesn't describe the "events" of the article, which can in fact be "identified in space and time". In fact, May 1968 ... in France indicates both directly. — Sangdeboeuf ( talk) 02:35, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
a time in a place and not a place in a time– one could make an argument for either, I guess. However, May 1968 in France seems to be the more commonly used phrase. — Sangdeboeuf ( talk) 12:16, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
headlines are written to grab readers' attention== recognizable. Sure, we don't use headlines as a source for a citation of a fact in an article. But when we're trying to determine which name is the most recognizable, common, and natural, headlines and titles are exactly where we should be looking. When we ask, "What should our article say in the body?", the answer is: what RSes say in their body. When we ask, "How should the article be structured?", we look to see how our RSes are structured. When we ask, "What should the title be?", we should look to see what our RSes use in their titles. Our title reflects their title. Our structure reflects their structure. Our body reflects their body. It's almost like a Wikipedia prayer "May 68" is what many editors think is the shortest, most recognizable name for that event. And those are the same editors who exercise the editorial control that makes an RS reliable. – Leviv ich 01:36, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Just browsing here from another article, is there any reason why the flags of the different sides have a different shade of blue? This hasn't been mentioned in the archive. I don't know if there was any difference between the two, and if there was, it's hardly as distinct as the flags of the two ideological sides in 20th-century Spain, or the two sides in modern Belarus. Unknown Temptation ( talk) 19:27, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
This
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on May 1968 events in France. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:23, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
Sous les pavés, la plage!
-Under the paving stones, the beach! -Beneath the pavement, the beach! -Under the paving stones you'll find sand! -Under the paving stones, the clear path to the beach!
Which is the best non litteral translation? Say in the article, it's the Parisian pavement of the streets, and the pavement stones were put out of the pavement and used as weapons by rioters. And they have been removed since this time, and replaced by concrete pavement to avoid this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.91.248.85 ( talk) 08:37, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Moved to May 68. Consensus to move the page away from its current title is clear; there is some disagreement as to the best target, but May 68 has the most support, and is stylistically distinct enough to serve as the primary topic of that term. BD2412 T 20:05, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
May 1968 events in France → ? – I don't know why the title uses the vaguely noncommittal events when the lead sentence tells us that the article is about a specific period of civil unrest.
Civil unrest encompasses such things as "demonstrations, major general strikes, and occupations of universities and factories". As a more
descriptive title, I would suggest
May 1968 French unrest or
French unrest of 1968, though other suggestions are also welcome.
Sangdeboeuf (
talk) 11:46, 15 October 2019 (UTC) --Relisting.
No such user (
talk) 12:05, 23 October 2019 (UTC) —Relisted.
P. I. Ellsworth,
ed.
put'r there 16:36, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
{{
ping}}
)
czar 13:24, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
social consciousness and activism ... history and philosophy. The English word events doesn't have any such philosophical significance that I know of, so Foucault's use of the term in French seems irrelevant. — Sangdeboeuf ( talk) 02:00, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
the event [...] is not a particular being that can be pinned down and identified in space and time [...] For Foucault, the event is [...] a kind of relational being, an outstanding and unsettled matter, which appears as it establishes connections across time and space(p. 88). Not only is this a highly idiosyncratic use of the word and therefore fairly abstruse jargon, it doesn't describe the "events" of the article, which can in fact be "identified in space and time". In fact, May 1968 ... in France indicates both directly. — Sangdeboeuf ( talk) 02:35, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
a time in a place and not a place in a time– one could make an argument for either, I guess. However, May 1968 in France seems to be the more commonly used phrase. — Sangdeboeuf ( talk) 12:16, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
headlines are written to grab readers' attention== recognizable. Sure, we don't use headlines as a source for a citation of a fact in an article. But when we're trying to determine which name is the most recognizable, common, and natural, headlines and titles are exactly where we should be looking. When we ask, "What should our article say in the body?", the answer is: what RSes say in their body. When we ask, "How should the article be structured?", we look to see how our RSes are structured. When we ask, "What should the title be?", we should look to see what our RSes use in their titles. Our title reflects their title. Our structure reflects their structure. Our body reflects their body. It's almost like a Wikipedia prayer "May 68" is what many editors think is the shortest, most recognizable name for that event. And those are the same editors who exercise the editorial control that makes an RS reliable. – Leviv ich 01:36, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Just browsing here from another article, is there any reason why the flags of the different sides have a different shade of blue? This hasn't been mentioned in the archive. I don't know if there was any difference between the two, and if there was, it's hardly as distinct as the flags of the two ideological sides in 20th-century Spain, or the two sides in modern Belarus. Unknown Temptation ( talk) 19:27, 22 September 2021 (UTC)