This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have rewritten this article without the plagiarism (which affected mainly the central section about his professional work), adding some relevant material from other sources. See Talk:Max Mallowan/Temp. I hope an administrator will now find and insert it. Myopic Bookworm 18:27, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 12:08, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
Should this biographical article be added to non biographical categories Category:Agatha Christie, Category:Nimrud and Category:Nineveh? -- wooden superman 13:34, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Keep people categories separate. We should not have a mix of biographical and non-biographical articles in the same categories. Yes, we categorise people by where they are from, but in a "people from..." tree, not just after the name of the place. Again, we are keeping the categories separate. Look at some of the examples at WP:OCASSOC. And spouse categories seem to be almost exclusively for royalty and similar. -- wooden superman 14:05, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
This article is literally named after a person and the dispute pertains to categories where such biographical article could be expected. Regards, Thinker78 (talk) 03:39, 3 February 2024 (UTC)This guideline concerns the categorization of biographical articles about people. This includes: *All articles named after a person or a group of persons. *All categories where such biographical articles could be expected to be located.
Where biographical articles are cateqorised by WP:DEFINING characteristics of the person. I point out Categorizing pages,
While it should typically be clear from the name of an existing category which pages it should contain, the text of the category page may sometimes provide additional information on potential category contents.
Regards, Thinker78 (talk) 19:26, 3 February 2024 (UTC)"Associations" can be problematic, §subjective and vague. As it can be determining what degree or nature of "association" with a particular subject is necessary to qualify for inclusion in such a category. The threshold of this may fail arbitrary inclusion criteria.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have rewritten this article without the plagiarism (which affected mainly the central section about his professional work), adding some relevant material from other sources. See Talk:Max Mallowan/Temp. I hope an administrator will now find and insert it. Myopic Bookworm 18:27, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 12:08, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
Should this biographical article be added to non biographical categories Category:Agatha Christie, Category:Nimrud and Category:Nineveh? -- wooden superman 13:34, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Keep people categories separate. We should not have a mix of biographical and non-biographical articles in the same categories. Yes, we categorise people by where they are from, but in a "people from..." tree, not just after the name of the place. Again, we are keeping the categories separate. Look at some of the examples at WP:OCASSOC. And spouse categories seem to be almost exclusively for royalty and similar. -- wooden superman 14:05, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
This article is literally named after a person and the dispute pertains to categories where such biographical article could be expected. Regards, Thinker78 (talk) 03:39, 3 February 2024 (UTC)This guideline concerns the categorization of biographical articles about people. This includes: *All articles named after a person or a group of persons. *All categories where such biographical articles could be expected to be located.
Where biographical articles are cateqorised by WP:DEFINING characteristics of the person. I point out Categorizing pages,
While it should typically be clear from the name of an existing category which pages it should contain, the text of the category page may sometimes provide additional information on potential category contents.
Regards, Thinker78 (talk) 19:26, 3 February 2024 (UTC)"Associations" can be problematic, §subjective and vague. As it can be determining what degree or nature of "association" with a particular subject is necessary to qualify for inclusion in such a category. The threshold of this may fail arbitrary inclusion criteria.