This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Comics: Marvel / Films Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Related work groups: /  This article is supported by Marvel Comics work group. This article is supported by Comic book films work group. Disney Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Film: Comic book / Marvel Cinematic Universe / American This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles This article is supported by the Comic book films task force. This article is supported by the Marvel Cinematic Universe task force. This article is supported by the American cinema task force. Media franchises Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media franchises, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to media franchises on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Media franchisesWikipedia:WikiProject Media franchisesTemplate:WikiProject Media franchisesmedia franchise articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: Cinema Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force. 2010s Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject 2010s, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2010s on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.2010sWikipedia:WikiProject 2010sTemplate:WikiProject 2010s2010s articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

I feel like these articles [1] [2] [3] could be used to show how Endgame was originally thought to be the end of Phase Three. As well as these [4] [5] could be used too to talk about the production and marketing. ★Trekker ( talk) 16:00, 4 August 2019 (UTC) reply

Theres also these: [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]. ★Trekker ( talk) 13:01, 7 August 2019 (UTC) reply

A centralized discussion regarding the images for this, the Phase One, and Phase Two articles, can be found at Talk:List of Marvel Cinematic Universe films#Phase One, Two, and Three article images. - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 14:47, 16 August 2020 (UTC) reply

I want to know why everyone thinks the TV Shows aren't in the MCU. I've watched them all and they clearly are in the MCU. To say otherwise means you haven't really been paying attention. Tinytimm101 ( talk) 17:52, 21 September 2020 (UTC) reply

How can people say Agents of Shield and the others aren't in the MCU when they clearly are? I just don't get it. Tinytimm101 ( talk) 17:53, 21 September 2020 (UTC) reply

They aren't part of the Phases, which is what this article is about. Perhaps if you don't get it is because you haven't done any research. If you look at List of Marvel Cinematic Universe television series, you'll see that all those TV series are included, so no one is say[ing] Agents of Shield and the others aren't in the MCU. El Millo ( talk) 18:00, 21 September 2020 (UTC) reply

@ Facu-el Millo: You recently reverted an edit I made.

Original text: "Avengers: Endgame became the highest-grossing film of all time."

My edit: "As of July 2021 ^[update], Avengers: Endgame is the second highest-grossing film of all time."

You reverted my edit back to the original, noting that "This isn't about the current position, but the peak position".

I disagree with your reasoning.

If it's about the peak position, then the wording is not clear—misleading even. "briefly became" could work, but then we'd need to describe where it landed. My edit describes where it ended up, links to the page where this info originated, and attaches a date.

If we want to save peak position, we can place it a footnote within the article. The way it's currently described is going to mislead people. I'm a native English speaker and it misled me—the wording is unclear and not salvageable.

Dloewenherz ( talk) 01:06, 14 July 2021 (UTC) reply

What's relevant is that the film became the highest-grossing film, regardless of whether it was beaten afterwards. Both statements can be there, but the fact it originally became the highest-grossing film has to stay. — El Millo ( talk) 01:12, 14 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Got it, ok, I think we can compromise here. My only problem is that I cannot find a source for it being the top-ranked movie. Shoot that over and I'll happily re-edit with both items combined. I found this article but the #'s are iffy when inflation is taken into account: https://www.gamespot.com/articles/avengers-endgame-is-the-top-grossing-movie-of-all-/1100-6468586/ Dloewenherz ( talk) 01:34, 14 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Inflation isn't taken into account when it comes to box office records, at least not for the standard records. Already added a footnote, both in the lead section and in the Box office section, that clarifies Avatar surpassed it. — El Millo ( talk) 01:36, 14 July 2021 (UTC) reply

See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film/Archive 75#Should we be listing a movie's "peak position" at the box office? for more info. — El Millo ( talk) 01:17, 14 July 2021 (UTC) reply