This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Composers This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Composers, a group of editors writing and developing biographical articles about composers of all eras and styles. The project discussion page is the place to talk about technical and editorial issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!ComposersWikipedia:WikiProject ComposersTemplate:WikiProject ComposersComposers articles Biography: Musicians This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians. Syria Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Syria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Syria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SyriaWikipedia:WikiProject SyriaTemplate:WikiProject SyriaSyria articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The article was tagged as a copyright violation of this source dated May 9, 2008. The article predates the "source", and the duplicate content was already in the article before the "source" was written: They plagiarized us. I have thus removed the copyright tag, but we need a better source. That one clearly is circular. Huon ( talk) 06:18, 13 August 2013 (UTC) reply

You may be right about this. Obviously I thought about it carefully before placing the copyvio tag (and noted the discrepancy in my edit summary). The fact remains that it is relatively unusual for complete ready-written articles to appear in this wiki, especially when that ready-written material is apparently drawn from a more complete version elsewhere. Possible explanations are that the article was previously published somewhere else, or that our article was contributed by the same author. I've asked for some expert eyes on this. I may very well be wrong (I have been many times before) but it doesn't seem "right" to me. And if I'm wrong, then let me apologise now. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 09:24, 13 August 2013 (UTC) reply

I suspect that they did not plagiarize us, but that rather we both took content from the first source cited by the article, the title of which was added in April of that year ( [1]...it looks familiar, no?). Unfortunately, I can't access archives for that article, and there's nothing to identify its author (it could be the same woman). Even the archives of his official website (though also cited and clearly in existence then) don't go back that far. Maddeningly, I can only get at the beginning of the issue, here. :P Without evidence, I don't think we can process this further, but it's good to note the possibility here. -- Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 18:40, 13 August 2013 (UTC) reply

Thanks, MRG! Once again the expert eye lights straight on the crux of the matter. Would it be appropriate now to prune out the bulk of what appears to be copy-pasted material? Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 00:13, 15 August 2013 (UTC) reply

When in doubt, I am more inclined to rewrite than to remove, since it might actually not be a copyvio. :) -- Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 21:05, 15 August 2013 (UTC) reply

And someone went straight ahead and copy-pasted more stuff here... Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 12:49, 22 August 2013 (UTC) reply

I'd like to try to clean up this article a bit. It's a shame that our page on such an interesting person should read so like a news release. I'd also like to improve the references, convert bare links to full citations and so on. Would anyone object if I changed the referencing system to list-defined at the same time? It would make it a lot easier to sort out the external links. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 12:49, 22 August 2013 (UTC) reply

I am trying to add references to updated information from articles and sources but for some reason you disapprove, delete and undo. Please help me figure out a way to amend this with appreciation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qetuipadgjlzcbm ( talk • contribs) 23:27, 11 February 2014 (UTC) reply

I'm sorry you are having trouble. I think it's mostly a matter of some small errors in formatting; I fixed some a couple of days ago, will fix more in a minute. However, the source given for the supposed family relationship with Steve Jobs cannot possibly be considered a reliable source in Wikipedia. It's not clear to me why you and several other editors find it so important to keep adding this unsupported statement to the article. Jandali is obviously fully notable and quite interesting in his own right, and doesn't need a connection to poor Jobs to give him status. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 01:06, 13 February 2014 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Malek Jandali. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110613054217/http://www.kennedy-center.org/calendar/index.cfm?fuseaction=showEvent&event=RLXBY to http://www.kennedy-center.org/calendar/index.cfm?fuseaction=showEvent&event=RLXBY

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:44, 14 January 2018 (UTC) reply

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Malek Jandali recording with the Royal Philhamornic Orchestra in London.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 16:22, 18 March 2022 (UTC) reply