This
level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I am not writer but i am interested i the life story of Thorile Madhavrao Peshwa.Please send me any information about his life
These should be in the article on Nanasaheb and not of Madhavrao I. Salilb ( talk) 11:00, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
The cited reference is more a work of literary fiction than a historically accurate document. Almost all of the content in this article is based on this reference and is likely to be inaccurate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.4.150.250 ( talk) 04:00, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
Agreed that the book is a novel. But, the events mentioned in thi novel are nothing but facts. The book may be categorized as a novel because it describes the incidents like meetings between Madhavrao and his wife, Madhavrao’s wife going Sati, meetings of Madhavrao and other rulers, Madhavrao’s thoughts, etc. from the writer’s point of view, but the writer hasn’t manipulated any event or fact. This book is completely based on facts and is backed up by concrete proofs. The only things which are included in this article from Swami are facts. According to me, the sole purpose of a such a book being written as a novel is that people should read it. Otherwise how different is it going to be from our history text books? Hope you understand. Kesangh ( talk) 09:57, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
This
level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I am not writer but i am interested i the life story of Thorile Madhavrao Peshwa.Please send me any information about his life
These should be in the article on Nanasaheb and not of Madhavrao I. Salilb ( talk) 11:00, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
The cited reference is more a work of literary fiction than a historically accurate document. Almost all of the content in this article is based on this reference and is likely to be inaccurate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.4.150.250 ( talk) 04:00, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
Agreed that the book is a novel. But, the events mentioned in thi novel are nothing but facts. The book may be categorized as a novel because it describes the incidents like meetings between Madhavrao and his wife, Madhavrao’s wife going Sati, meetings of Madhavrao and other rulers, Madhavrao’s thoughts, etc. from the writer’s point of view, but the writer hasn’t manipulated any event or fact. This book is completely based on facts and is backed up by concrete proofs. The only things which are included in this article from Swami are facts. According to me, the sole purpose of a such a book being written as a novel is that people should read it. Otherwise how different is it going to be from our history text books? Hope you understand. Kesangh ( talk) 09:57, 28 May 2009 (UTC)