List of national parks of the United States is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured list on March 5, 2012. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
April 2, 2010. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the United States has
58 National Parks in 29 states and territories, the first of which was
Yellowstone National Park, created in 1872? |
This article is rated FL-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is a bit surprising that this article was promoted to Featured list status without a proper map of all national parks (as in the French and German articles). Poppy ( talk) 09:19, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
Just wondering a creating a visitation column for the US national Parks. That way people can sort by most visited US national parks. The information can be verified for visitation through the US National Park Service, for citation concerns. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.183.184.25 ( talk) 19:48, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
For most reasonable browser window widths, the table format really impedes the readability of the list. The rightmost text has fewer words per line than frontpage newspaper articles and the vast majority of the table space in each row is empty. This would be much easier to read in a more conventional inline format. 71.103.149.123 ( talk) 04:53, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
Dust Up; Biologist Jayne Belnap warns of the consequences for the American West if we don't preserve a home for the minute organisms that live in desert topsoil by Brendan Borrell Scientific American January 5, 2012 (page 80 to 83, January 2012 issue) Jayne Belnap is a Research Ecologist at the U.S. Geological Survey with a research focus of the biological crusts that hold in place desert dust and their ecological impact on human activities. Excerpt “We just need to start putting dust into the equation.”
See A Crust of Dust: Degradation of Desert Topsoil by Human Activities May Wreak Havoc with the Environment by Brendan Borrell and Gary Stix January 10, 2012; and, Canyonlands National Park and Arches National Park, Regional effects of global warming, Soil crust and dirt ( soil), nitrogen fixation and carbon fixation, global warming, effects of global warming, Climate change in the United States, planetary boundaries, Collema ( lichen), grasses, Bureau of Land Management, Land use, ... ; excerpt ...
You've done a lot of your research in national parks. How are they preparing for climate change? Well, the parks are really in a quandary because they're supposed to be conserving a landscape, which is kind of hard with climate change. They are going through a soul-searching exercise of what does it mean to be a park? I mean we kind of know what it means when, you know, you can say, "Well, we don't graze cattle" but what do you do about regional nitrogen solutions, what do you do about regional air pollution, what do you do about regional dust production? The first thing that I think we all need recognize is that there are no natural systems left. Everything is managed because everything is impacted by humans. We don't have any nonimpacted systems, and so the question now is how do you keep stuff as natural as possible, given the fact you do have regional air pollution, whether it be nitrogen deposition or dust or whatever—and that's really gonna be hard for the parks. So I think the one thing is to make sure that they keep up their monitoring, which they're doing, so they understand the status and trends of their resources. ...
99.190.80.182 ( talk) 09:09, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
It looks like there are some mistakes / confusion with the dates. It is mentionned that the dates indicate when the park was formed but it looks like it is sometimes confusing between :
For example, for Isle Royale National Park, the dates don't correspond on the article and here. Poppy ( talk) 22:10, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
I have recently made several edits to the description paragraphs for most of the 59 national parks in the table. The last two edits I made, which updated the page's info for Yellowstone, Yosemite, and Zion, were undone because they were believed to have constituted 'puffery'. I don't think this is the case, however, because my edits contain useful information and additional links. Many of the descriptions on this page suffered from weak grammar and especially poor and/or uninspiring style; I'm simply trying to improve them with a more attractive and inviting style; these parks are America's greatest natural resources, and the descriptions should reflect that.
Most of the revisions only consist of a few minor changes; others include more information to help readers to better imagine (in concise paragraphs) the amazing things each park protects. I updated most of the park descriptions, yet only the Yellowstone, Yosemite, and Zion revisions were undone. At the very least there should be consistency. Out of all the parks, these final three in the list perhaps benefit the most from such changes in style. PJsg1011 ( talk) 21:42, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
This list contains none of the National Parks of West Virginia, UNLESS I have missed something??? Coal town guy ( talk) 00:18, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
I know it's a transliteration, but the "ee" sounds are separated and an apostrophe better indicates that. I almost changed it, but then realized that every place it says "Hawaii" is a link to another page, and by changing them I would be making them links to pages that do not exist. I still think things should be changed in regard to this (although I know it's a minor point), but moving the sites is beyond my ability and would take a lot of work (changing the links on all the pages that link to them). 72.70.227.56 ( talk) 00:22, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Hawaii may be an apostrophe here, but Puerto Rico, with one of the oldest U.S. National Parks, is not even in sight. What is the reason? Thanks Caballero/Historiador ⎌ 03:56, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Thanks all. Excellent explanations about the NPS possible handling of spaces and the local names. I agree with your assessment of the sites too. Caballero/Historiador ⎌ 02:10, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of national parks of the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 07:41, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
I've noticed many edits on this article seem to be a back and forth changing of dates. There's consistent disagreement over whether the date listed should be the date the area was established as protected area or when it was designated a national park. I propose the following compromise, why not list both? I see no reason we can't have two separate columns labeled "date national park established" and "date area preserved" respectively. Do other editors here think this will help resolve the cycle of date reversion that keeps going on here?
–
Sparkgap (
talk) 21:09, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of List of national parks of the United States's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "npsakso1":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:39, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
I added a 'citation needed' tag on this sentence in the opening paragraph: Seven national parks (six in Alaska) are paired with a National Preserve. I'm not sure this is accurate. I know that Great Sand Dunes (in Colorado) is paired directly with a preserve, and adjoining Everglades (in Florida) is Big Cypress National Preserve (and I believe they are jointly managed). That would be 2 outside of Alaska (without much thought or research into the whole system). Hence, I think the sentence should be checked. - Hooperswim ( talk) 17:44, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
Does anyone know when the NPS updates park visitation numbers? I've spent the last few months updating numbers on individual park pages, and I see that the numbers for this article haven't been updated past 2014. If the NPS publishes the number pretty soon after the new year, I'll hold off on making any edits/updates until they do. That being said, I noticed that past edits regarding this topic were made in/around June. If it's going to be that long a wait, perhaps I should update the numbers on this article to 2015's figures now. I just didn't want to post numbers if they become old news a day later. Pistongrinder ( talk) 18:36, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
Any value to adding two sortable columns to mark all national parks that are designated UNESCO World Heritage Sites and Biosphere Reserves? Currently, only a non-sortable "(WHS)" is shown at the end of each description. It would be easier to just add "(BR)" to relevant descriptions instead of sortable columns, especially since those columns would mostly be blank, wasted space for the majority of parks, but then the sorting option is lost. How many readers would use such a sorting option? Brian W. Schaller ( talk) 23:11, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 20 external links on List of national parks of the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:48, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Capitalization of the above term is inconsistent in the article. I believe it should always be "National Park", as the parks in question were given that title by the government. The term national park is another matter; see the linked article for a possible definition. For example, the IUCN designates the term as a category II protected area. However, some U.S. National Parks are a different category (e.g., Gates of the Arctic, and Glacier Bay, are both category VI). Since this involves a number of edits, I'd like to hear what other people think before proceeding. -- Larry/Traveling_Man ( talk) 21:30, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
My fingers decided to hit the ENTER key prematurely. The edit summary should have said: Change "National parks" to "National Parks", as in the next sentence. -- Larry/Traveling_Man ( talk) 21:26, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
Time to update? It appears official now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.59.253.106 ( talk) 14:02, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
According to this article it is 192.83 acres, but according to the article Gateway Arch National Park it is 91 acres, which is also the number in the park internet site אביהו ( talk) 22:32, 30 March 2018 (UTC).
What is nation? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.126.169.6 ( talk) 06:42, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
First of all thanks User:Brian_W._Schaller for mentioning and commenting not working link.
To start from beginning - I believe that it is beneficial for article readers to have some interactive map of all parks.
Generally as a reader I will also prefer to have state parks marked in some way on map.
I tried to use Kartographer extensions, but right now GeoJSON file is too large.
Thats why I included inter wiki link to ShareMap - generally the policy is that interwiki links not like external links can be included inline inside article ( Help:Interwiki_linking). For example take a look on the WorldCat link in this article - The_Firm_(novel). But it is up to you guys - if you prefer to move link to the bottom to external link or references please do this. Also there are. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jkan997 ( talk • contribs) 11:07, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
OK - thanks for info -- Jkan997 ( talk) 22:19, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
I was able to make an interactive map using mapframe/wikidata. Let me know what you think and I can add it to the page User:Acebarry/sandbox/National_Park_Map Acebarry ( talk) 02:01, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
Acebarry Great job on the interactive map! I just wanted to let you know that it is missing Glacier National Park in Montana. Mjp797 ( talk) 19:05, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
I'm not sure if a Wikipedia representative will read this, but if so, you are missing the following (pretty famous) National Parks on the interactive map:
- Glacier National Park, Montana - Redwood National Park, California - Haleakaia National Park, Hawaii
Please add these parks to your interactive map, and anywhere else where they may be missing to bring up to correct status.
Thank you! - M. Frank 47.132.148.152 ( talk) 18:34, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Yeah we need someone to fix it. Can we fix it? Maybe, I’m not skilled in that area of externally linking the selected 63 US national parks on OpemStreetMap. Hope some editor with higher knowledge can fix such problems Jerry Steinfield ( talk) 23:34, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
It’s being discussed, but the work on it has not been finished yet Jerry Steinfield ( talk) 23:37, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
List of national parks of the United States is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured list on March 5, 2012. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
April 2, 2010. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the United States has
58 National Parks in 29 states and territories, the first of which was
Yellowstone National Park, created in 1872? |
This article is rated FL-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is a bit surprising that this article was promoted to Featured list status without a proper map of all national parks (as in the French and German articles). Poppy ( talk) 09:19, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
Just wondering a creating a visitation column for the US national Parks. That way people can sort by most visited US national parks. The information can be verified for visitation through the US National Park Service, for citation concerns. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.183.184.25 ( talk) 19:48, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
For most reasonable browser window widths, the table format really impedes the readability of the list. The rightmost text has fewer words per line than frontpage newspaper articles and the vast majority of the table space in each row is empty. This would be much easier to read in a more conventional inline format. 71.103.149.123 ( talk) 04:53, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
Dust Up; Biologist Jayne Belnap warns of the consequences for the American West if we don't preserve a home for the minute organisms that live in desert topsoil by Brendan Borrell Scientific American January 5, 2012 (page 80 to 83, January 2012 issue) Jayne Belnap is a Research Ecologist at the U.S. Geological Survey with a research focus of the biological crusts that hold in place desert dust and their ecological impact on human activities. Excerpt “We just need to start putting dust into the equation.”
See A Crust of Dust: Degradation of Desert Topsoil by Human Activities May Wreak Havoc with the Environment by Brendan Borrell and Gary Stix January 10, 2012; and, Canyonlands National Park and Arches National Park, Regional effects of global warming, Soil crust and dirt ( soil), nitrogen fixation and carbon fixation, global warming, effects of global warming, Climate change in the United States, planetary boundaries, Collema ( lichen), grasses, Bureau of Land Management, Land use, ... ; excerpt ...
You've done a lot of your research in national parks. How are they preparing for climate change? Well, the parks are really in a quandary because they're supposed to be conserving a landscape, which is kind of hard with climate change. They are going through a soul-searching exercise of what does it mean to be a park? I mean we kind of know what it means when, you know, you can say, "Well, we don't graze cattle" but what do you do about regional nitrogen solutions, what do you do about regional air pollution, what do you do about regional dust production? The first thing that I think we all need recognize is that there are no natural systems left. Everything is managed because everything is impacted by humans. We don't have any nonimpacted systems, and so the question now is how do you keep stuff as natural as possible, given the fact you do have regional air pollution, whether it be nitrogen deposition or dust or whatever—and that's really gonna be hard for the parks. So I think the one thing is to make sure that they keep up their monitoring, which they're doing, so they understand the status and trends of their resources. ...
99.190.80.182 ( talk) 09:09, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
It looks like there are some mistakes / confusion with the dates. It is mentionned that the dates indicate when the park was formed but it looks like it is sometimes confusing between :
For example, for Isle Royale National Park, the dates don't correspond on the article and here. Poppy ( talk) 22:10, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
I have recently made several edits to the description paragraphs for most of the 59 national parks in the table. The last two edits I made, which updated the page's info for Yellowstone, Yosemite, and Zion, were undone because they were believed to have constituted 'puffery'. I don't think this is the case, however, because my edits contain useful information and additional links. Many of the descriptions on this page suffered from weak grammar and especially poor and/or uninspiring style; I'm simply trying to improve them with a more attractive and inviting style; these parks are America's greatest natural resources, and the descriptions should reflect that.
Most of the revisions only consist of a few minor changes; others include more information to help readers to better imagine (in concise paragraphs) the amazing things each park protects. I updated most of the park descriptions, yet only the Yellowstone, Yosemite, and Zion revisions were undone. At the very least there should be consistency. Out of all the parks, these final three in the list perhaps benefit the most from such changes in style. PJsg1011 ( talk) 21:42, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
This list contains none of the National Parks of West Virginia, UNLESS I have missed something??? Coal town guy ( talk) 00:18, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
I know it's a transliteration, but the "ee" sounds are separated and an apostrophe better indicates that. I almost changed it, but then realized that every place it says "Hawaii" is a link to another page, and by changing them I would be making them links to pages that do not exist. I still think things should be changed in regard to this (although I know it's a minor point), but moving the sites is beyond my ability and would take a lot of work (changing the links on all the pages that link to them). 72.70.227.56 ( talk) 00:22, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Hawaii may be an apostrophe here, but Puerto Rico, with one of the oldest U.S. National Parks, is not even in sight. What is the reason? Thanks Caballero/Historiador ⎌ 03:56, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Thanks all. Excellent explanations about the NPS possible handling of spaces and the local names. I agree with your assessment of the sites too. Caballero/Historiador ⎌ 02:10, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of national parks of the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 07:41, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
I've noticed many edits on this article seem to be a back and forth changing of dates. There's consistent disagreement over whether the date listed should be the date the area was established as protected area or when it was designated a national park. I propose the following compromise, why not list both? I see no reason we can't have two separate columns labeled "date national park established" and "date area preserved" respectively. Do other editors here think this will help resolve the cycle of date reversion that keeps going on here?
–
Sparkgap (
talk) 21:09, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of List of national parks of the United States's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "npsakso1":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:39, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
I added a 'citation needed' tag on this sentence in the opening paragraph: Seven national parks (six in Alaska) are paired with a National Preserve. I'm not sure this is accurate. I know that Great Sand Dunes (in Colorado) is paired directly with a preserve, and adjoining Everglades (in Florida) is Big Cypress National Preserve (and I believe they are jointly managed). That would be 2 outside of Alaska (without much thought or research into the whole system). Hence, I think the sentence should be checked. - Hooperswim ( talk) 17:44, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
Does anyone know when the NPS updates park visitation numbers? I've spent the last few months updating numbers on individual park pages, and I see that the numbers for this article haven't been updated past 2014. If the NPS publishes the number pretty soon after the new year, I'll hold off on making any edits/updates until they do. That being said, I noticed that past edits regarding this topic were made in/around June. If it's going to be that long a wait, perhaps I should update the numbers on this article to 2015's figures now. I just didn't want to post numbers if they become old news a day later. Pistongrinder ( talk) 18:36, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
Any value to adding two sortable columns to mark all national parks that are designated UNESCO World Heritage Sites and Biosphere Reserves? Currently, only a non-sortable "(WHS)" is shown at the end of each description. It would be easier to just add "(BR)" to relevant descriptions instead of sortable columns, especially since those columns would mostly be blank, wasted space for the majority of parks, but then the sorting option is lost. How many readers would use such a sorting option? Brian W. Schaller ( talk) 23:11, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 20 external links on List of national parks of the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:48, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Capitalization of the above term is inconsistent in the article. I believe it should always be "National Park", as the parks in question were given that title by the government. The term national park is another matter; see the linked article for a possible definition. For example, the IUCN designates the term as a category II protected area. However, some U.S. National Parks are a different category (e.g., Gates of the Arctic, and Glacier Bay, are both category VI). Since this involves a number of edits, I'd like to hear what other people think before proceeding. -- Larry/Traveling_Man ( talk) 21:30, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
My fingers decided to hit the ENTER key prematurely. The edit summary should have said: Change "National parks" to "National Parks", as in the next sentence. -- Larry/Traveling_Man ( talk) 21:26, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
Time to update? It appears official now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.59.253.106 ( talk) 14:02, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
According to this article it is 192.83 acres, but according to the article Gateway Arch National Park it is 91 acres, which is also the number in the park internet site אביהו ( talk) 22:32, 30 March 2018 (UTC).
What is nation? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.126.169.6 ( talk) 06:42, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
First of all thanks User:Brian_W._Schaller for mentioning and commenting not working link.
To start from beginning - I believe that it is beneficial for article readers to have some interactive map of all parks.
Generally as a reader I will also prefer to have state parks marked in some way on map.
I tried to use Kartographer extensions, but right now GeoJSON file is too large.
Thats why I included inter wiki link to ShareMap - generally the policy is that interwiki links not like external links can be included inline inside article ( Help:Interwiki_linking). For example take a look on the WorldCat link in this article - The_Firm_(novel). But it is up to you guys - if you prefer to move link to the bottom to external link or references please do this. Also there are. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jkan997 ( talk • contribs) 11:07, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
OK - thanks for info -- Jkan997 ( talk) 22:19, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
I was able to make an interactive map using mapframe/wikidata. Let me know what you think and I can add it to the page User:Acebarry/sandbox/National_Park_Map Acebarry ( talk) 02:01, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
Acebarry Great job on the interactive map! I just wanted to let you know that it is missing Glacier National Park in Montana. Mjp797 ( talk) 19:05, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
I'm not sure if a Wikipedia representative will read this, but if so, you are missing the following (pretty famous) National Parks on the interactive map:
- Glacier National Park, Montana - Redwood National Park, California - Haleakaia National Park, Hawaii
Please add these parks to your interactive map, and anywhere else where they may be missing to bring up to correct status.
Thank you! - M. Frank 47.132.148.152 ( talk) 18:34, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Yeah we need someone to fix it. Can we fix it? Maybe, I’m not skilled in that area of externally linking the selected 63 US national parks on OpemStreetMap. Hope some editor with higher knowledge can fix such problems Jerry Steinfield ( talk) 23:34, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
It’s being discussed, but the work on it has not been finished yet Jerry Steinfield ( talk) 23:37, 25 June 2022 (UTC)