This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
Surely, the ICO in the UK is considered as a law enforcement authority, responsible for (inter alia) the UK Data Protection Act (2018). 217.138.133.34 ( talk) 11:37, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
User:Dibble999 and I have been bold and worked on a re-write of the article that makes this more of an article rather than just a list, and talks about the varying types of force and jurisdiction. We've done a bit in a sandpit but I'm now sticking it here to stop any forking of the article. All additions / critisisms welcome! Sapient 23:58, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
I have edited this artickle with legitimate material relating to law enforcement activities undertaken by the Fire Authority and Local Authorities in the UK The do have a legitimate Law Enforcement function and should be included witthin this article Whoever keeps deleting it please kindly discuss why you are deleting them! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.244.223.82 ( talk) 15:00, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
Nik Staines via Infowar Social Networking Coalition about an hour ago ·
BREAKING CHEMTRAIL SCIENTIST MURDERED AFTER GOING ON NATIONAL RADIO www.youtube.com Environmental Scientists Eugene Franklin Mallove, Juventina Villa Mojica and Dorothy Stang murdered after releasing lab test results linking chemtrails to th... Like · · Share — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.102.97.95 ( talk) 21:12, 27 July 2013 (UTC) I do not think the title of this article is quite right, as its a bit more than just a list now. I would suggest Police Forces of the United Kingdom or something similar. Any thoughts/better ideas? Dibble999 08:04, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
I don't reckon it would be good to merge them. Having an explanation of the various types of police force and an explanation of jurisdictions etc with the list is, I think, more beneficial to someone who has no knowledge of the police system in the UK. It also breaks up what would just be a long list otherwise. However I agree that the name change I suggested might be confusing. I suppose leave it as it is for now? Dibble999 02:40, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
I removed Warwickshire and Coventry Constabulary because it was just a merger of two existing forces without an interesting name. This is not exactly consistent, but I think if we add this type of force we should add them all. But then it gets rather tricky - do we list the pre-1974 Lancashire Constabulary as a former force? Morwen - Talk 22:13, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
Some of you might have noticed the {{ UK Police}} template has been quite volatile recently. Your input is welcome: Template talk:UK Police#It's got bigger again. Thanks/ wangi 13:30, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
Something needs adding to show the existance of this new national enforsement agency
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sumo su ( talk • contribs) 18:01, 22 December 2006 (UTC).
-- Sumo su 15:23, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
The title and first paragraph of this article appears to have been regionalised to fit USA parlance. In the UK the term 'law enforcement agency' is rarely, if ever, used. The first paragraph has been drastically re-written to the point where it doesn't make sense in terms of day to day policing of the public and there are a number of points which I take issue with. Dibble999 ( talk) 17:12, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
I would take issue that the article used to solely be concerned with 'preventative' police forces. The territorial police forces conduct and obtain the vast majority of investigations and detections into crime in the UK so 'preventative' isn't accurate for starters. The term law enforcement agency is extremely American, and as already pointed out is not used in general parlance in common speech in the UK or professionally by the criminal justice system. The problem with the start of the article is that it outlines 4 types which are involved in policing the general public. This does not really reflect reality. 95% of all public - 'police/law enforcement' contact will be with the territorial police forces with the special police forces coming a distant second (BTP mainly) and the others way behind within their extremely specialist/limited remit. The conceivable list of organisations which have executive powers (such as the dog mess and local authorities you mention) could make this article incredibly large and unwieldy. The amount of organisations which are beginning to creep into this article is making the article diluted. Policing does not fully = law enforcement as you state. Even members of the public can conduct law enforcement. My viewpoint is that this article was far more useful and relevant when it described and outlined the various police forces and true policing organisations such as SOCA and UKBA. You could then link this article to other non police organisations that have limited executive powers such as HSE and RAIB. Otherwise I think the article is beginning to lose its way. The average reader I think, would look at this article to look at the police forces. Those interested in a more thorough look at the plethora of other organisations with legal powers could follow a link. Dibble999 ( talk) 23:10, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
On re-reading my previous input, I probably came across as a touch stroppy. My apologies for this, it was late!In relation to the title, the term 'law enforcement agency', is, I believe not relevant to the the UK and highly americanised. If we must use 'law enforcement' then I believe the title should read law enforcement 'organisations' as the term 'agency' has certain legal definitions which does not fit police forces in the UK. The vast majority of law enforcement (in terms of criminal law) is and will, for the forseeable future, be carried out by the police forces. I would agree that organisations such as SOCA, UKBA should be in the article, however HSE, RAIB and Fisheries Protection is stretching the point me thinks. I will attempt to re-write the first paragraph of the article to better reflect this both in terms of the practical and legal situation when I have a moment. Regards Dibble999 ( talk) 14:22, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
I am recommending the stub articles listed in this section be redirected here.
Port of Bristol Police and
Port of Dover Police are not stubs and are not affected by this proposed merger.
Larne Harbour Police is under AfD (
discuss), I will be proposing a merger here as a possible resolution to the AfD.
davidwr/(
talk)/(
contribs)/(
e-mail) 22:38, 24 June 2008 (UTC) Update: I have proposed a merger to here on the AfD discussion page for Larne Harbor Police.
davidwr/(
talk)/(
contribs)/(
e-mail) 22:54, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Should Toytown Police be included, Mr. Plod has after all passed into the English language as a name for a police officer?
This list ( List of police forces in Wales sorted by region) is entirely redundant. Drseuk has just taken the first part of the name of each police force and specified it as the relevant "region". Needless to say each "region" only contains one police force, so it provides no useful information at all. Furthermore, these "regions" aren't generally recognised as regions in any other sense, so what exactly is the purpose of this article? Owain ( talk) 18:39, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
The National Police Air Service should probably be added to the article but I've no idea in which section it should be added. -- Thefrood ( talk) 00:13, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
Fictional lists are usually in separate pages - this should probably be a section of List of fictional institutions or maybe split to a new page. Peter James ( talk) 11:35, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
I have edited this article a lot, attempting to update the information and improve accuracy. A lot has been restructured, mainly to improve accuracy, however if you feel any of my edits were incorrect please manually change that specifically to avoid reverting other, accurate changes. Regards, Rob ( talk) 22:19, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
Although Crown Dependencies, and Overseas territories are not part of the UK per say they do have British nationality and citizenship according to their respective articles and a British citizenship act passed in 1981. They are technically British; so it could be helpful to list them in this article. Overseas territories aren't technically part of the UK proper either.
I could suggest as an alternative to listing both territories and dependencies in the article that a separate article that lists Crown Dependency and Overseas territories police forces be created separately and just linked to the current list of UK police agencies in a see also section.
Mrld ( talk) 23:24, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Much of this article is structured by legal basis. I don't think this is exactly helpful to readers. Instead, simply stating what kind of unit/force they are might be more useful. I don't think the fact that the British Transport Police is defined in legislation as a "Special police force" is really relevant. And contrasting it with other national units/forces such as the National Domestic Extremism Unit, based on being defined differently in law seems pointless. I recommend, for the special police units, we have a summary paragraph, stating what they are, and the different kind of laws they may be defined under, then just list them all in one list. Similarly, other sections could do with restructuring based on the same principles. Rob ( talk | contribs) 14:50, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
Law enforcement agencies in British dependent territories are 'British law enforcement agencies', but not 'law enforcement agencies in the United Kingdom'. We could properly expand the scope of the article to include these agencies, but it would require moving the article to 'List of British law enforcement agencies', and a little rewording. Thoughts? Rob ( talk | contribs) 15:25, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
I would suggest you need to clarify what is meant by 'limited executive powers' and 'purely investigatory'. E.g. Environmental Health and Trading Standards Officers in Local Authorities have powers of entry to business premises without a warrant; powers to seize goods and documents; and, in the EH case, powers to order premises to cease trading temporarily. Both take prosecutions through the local Council without involving the Police or Crown Prosecution Service, up to and including fraud cases 82.26.204.231 ( talk) 19:37, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
This is article is more than a list, and by it nature this topic needs a full article to cover it properly, so I propose moving this page to Law enforcement agencies in the United Kingdom, which is currently a redirect to this page. Any comments from other editors on this move are requested. Whizz40 ( talk) 06:27, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
List of law enforcement agencies in the United Kingdom, Crown dependencies and British Overseas Territories. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 15:49, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Literally a law unto themselves. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:490:A600:1DED:3C54:7DF3:9B88 ( talk) 20:14, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
You are a liar. Even the 'real British police' are unhappy with these uniformed racial Jews-only paramilitary Shorim police force in Britain. Also note the 'Shorim' police car in full official Metropolitan Police colours, but with the word: SHORIM over POLICE... http://www.hamhigh.co.uk/news/crime-court/we_look_nothing_like_police_says_leader_from_golders_green_s_shomrim_response_team_1_4197572 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:490:A600:6146:174B:F9BD:AA2C ( talk) 15:30, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
The title of the wiki page is willfully misleading, these so-called 'neighborhood watch group'. - in Britain, notwithstanding their Jewish headwear, strut about in full police-force uniform and are armed with full police force weaponry and drive about in police cars in fill police livery. Anyway, like I said, this article needs to link to wiki article /info/en/?search=Shomrim_(neighborhood_watch_group) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:490:A600:49E3:6AAA:8A8E:A08A ( talk) 06:08, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on List of law enforcement agencies in the United Kingdom, Crown dependencies and British Overseas Territories. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:48, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on List of law enforcement agencies in the United Kingdom, Crown dependencies and British Overseas Territories. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:37, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
I note that at the bottom of the article there is developing a huge (and growing) list of fictional police forces that have been portrayed in TV, Film and other productions. I'm not really sure that this article is the best place for this list of made up forces. The article is about actual police forces in the United Kingdom along with some detail about juridiction and remit etc. I don't believe this article is the place for a list of fictional forces. My suggestion is to remove the list and if someone wants to create a new article about these fictional forces they are more than welcome but I really don't see the encyclopedic benefit - they don't exist etc - they can be added to the individual film or TV production article if required. Just seems a bizzarre list added to the bottom of this aticle. Thoughts anyone? Bowchaser ( talk) 09:10, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 09:08, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 15:23, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
Surely, the ICO in the UK is considered as a law enforcement authority, responsible for (inter alia) the UK Data Protection Act (2018). 217.138.133.34 ( talk) 11:37, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
User:Dibble999 and I have been bold and worked on a re-write of the article that makes this more of an article rather than just a list, and talks about the varying types of force and jurisdiction. We've done a bit in a sandpit but I'm now sticking it here to stop any forking of the article. All additions / critisisms welcome! Sapient 23:58, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
I have edited this artickle with legitimate material relating to law enforcement activities undertaken by the Fire Authority and Local Authorities in the UK The do have a legitimate Law Enforcement function and should be included witthin this article Whoever keeps deleting it please kindly discuss why you are deleting them! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.244.223.82 ( talk) 15:00, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
Nik Staines via Infowar Social Networking Coalition about an hour ago ·
BREAKING CHEMTRAIL SCIENTIST MURDERED AFTER GOING ON NATIONAL RADIO www.youtube.com Environmental Scientists Eugene Franklin Mallove, Juventina Villa Mojica and Dorothy Stang murdered after releasing lab test results linking chemtrails to th... Like · · Share — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.102.97.95 ( talk) 21:12, 27 July 2013 (UTC) I do not think the title of this article is quite right, as its a bit more than just a list now. I would suggest Police Forces of the United Kingdom or something similar. Any thoughts/better ideas? Dibble999 08:04, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
I don't reckon it would be good to merge them. Having an explanation of the various types of police force and an explanation of jurisdictions etc with the list is, I think, more beneficial to someone who has no knowledge of the police system in the UK. It also breaks up what would just be a long list otherwise. However I agree that the name change I suggested might be confusing. I suppose leave it as it is for now? Dibble999 02:40, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
I removed Warwickshire and Coventry Constabulary because it was just a merger of two existing forces without an interesting name. This is not exactly consistent, but I think if we add this type of force we should add them all. But then it gets rather tricky - do we list the pre-1974 Lancashire Constabulary as a former force? Morwen - Talk 22:13, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
Some of you might have noticed the {{ UK Police}} template has been quite volatile recently. Your input is welcome: Template talk:UK Police#It's got bigger again. Thanks/ wangi 13:30, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
Something needs adding to show the existance of this new national enforsement agency
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sumo su ( talk • contribs) 18:01, 22 December 2006 (UTC).
-- Sumo su 15:23, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
The title and first paragraph of this article appears to have been regionalised to fit USA parlance. In the UK the term 'law enforcement agency' is rarely, if ever, used. The first paragraph has been drastically re-written to the point where it doesn't make sense in terms of day to day policing of the public and there are a number of points which I take issue with. Dibble999 ( talk) 17:12, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
I would take issue that the article used to solely be concerned with 'preventative' police forces. The territorial police forces conduct and obtain the vast majority of investigations and detections into crime in the UK so 'preventative' isn't accurate for starters. The term law enforcement agency is extremely American, and as already pointed out is not used in general parlance in common speech in the UK or professionally by the criminal justice system. The problem with the start of the article is that it outlines 4 types which are involved in policing the general public. This does not really reflect reality. 95% of all public - 'police/law enforcement' contact will be with the territorial police forces with the special police forces coming a distant second (BTP mainly) and the others way behind within their extremely specialist/limited remit. The conceivable list of organisations which have executive powers (such as the dog mess and local authorities you mention) could make this article incredibly large and unwieldy. The amount of organisations which are beginning to creep into this article is making the article diluted. Policing does not fully = law enforcement as you state. Even members of the public can conduct law enforcement. My viewpoint is that this article was far more useful and relevant when it described and outlined the various police forces and true policing organisations such as SOCA and UKBA. You could then link this article to other non police organisations that have limited executive powers such as HSE and RAIB. Otherwise I think the article is beginning to lose its way. The average reader I think, would look at this article to look at the police forces. Those interested in a more thorough look at the plethora of other organisations with legal powers could follow a link. Dibble999 ( talk) 23:10, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
On re-reading my previous input, I probably came across as a touch stroppy. My apologies for this, it was late!In relation to the title, the term 'law enforcement agency', is, I believe not relevant to the the UK and highly americanised. If we must use 'law enforcement' then I believe the title should read law enforcement 'organisations' as the term 'agency' has certain legal definitions which does not fit police forces in the UK. The vast majority of law enforcement (in terms of criminal law) is and will, for the forseeable future, be carried out by the police forces. I would agree that organisations such as SOCA, UKBA should be in the article, however HSE, RAIB and Fisheries Protection is stretching the point me thinks. I will attempt to re-write the first paragraph of the article to better reflect this both in terms of the practical and legal situation when I have a moment. Regards Dibble999 ( talk) 14:22, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
I am recommending the stub articles listed in this section be redirected here.
Port of Bristol Police and
Port of Dover Police are not stubs and are not affected by this proposed merger.
Larne Harbour Police is under AfD (
discuss), I will be proposing a merger here as a possible resolution to the AfD.
davidwr/(
talk)/(
contribs)/(
e-mail) 22:38, 24 June 2008 (UTC) Update: I have proposed a merger to here on the AfD discussion page for Larne Harbor Police.
davidwr/(
talk)/(
contribs)/(
e-mail) 22:54, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Should Toytown Police be included, Mr. Plod has after all passed into the English language as a name for a police officer?
This list ( List of police forces in Wales sorted by region) is entirely redundant. Drseuk has just taken the first part of the name of each police force and specified it as the relevant "region". Needless to say each "region" only contains one police force, so it provides no useful information at all. Furthermore, these "regions" aren't generally recognised as regions in any other sense, so what exactly is the purpose of this article? Owain ( talk) 18:39, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
The National Police Air Service should probably be added to the article but I've no idea in which section it should be added. -- Thefrood ( talk) 00:13, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
Fictional lists are usually in separate pages - this should probably be a section of List of fictional institutions or maybe split to a new page. Peter James ( talk) 11:35, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
I have edited this article a lot, attempting to update the information and improve accuracy. A lot has been restructured, mainly to improve accuracy, however if you feel any of my edits were incorrect please manually change that specifically to avoid reverting other, accurate changes. Regards, Rob ( talk) 22:19, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
Although Crown Dependencies, and Overseas territories are not part of the UK per say they do have British nationality and citizenship according to their respective articles and a British citizenship act passed in 1981. They are technically British; so it could be helpful to list them in this article. Overseas territories aren't technically part of the UK proper either.
I could suggest as an alternative to listing both territories and dependencies in the article that a separate article that lists Crown Dependency and Overseas territories police forces be created separately and just linked to the current list of UK police agencies in a see also section.
Mrld ( talk) 23:24, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Much of this article is structured by legal basis. I don't think this is exactly helpful to readers. Instead, simply stating what kind of unit/force they are might be more useful. I don't think the fact that the British Transport Police is defined in legislation as a "Special police force" is really relevant. And contrasting it with other national units/forces such as the National Domestic Extremism Unit, based on being defined differently in law seems pointless. I recommend, for the special police units, we have a summary paragraph, stating what they are, and the different kind of laws they may be defined under, then just list them all in one list. Similarly, other sections could do with restructuring based on the same principles. Rob ( talk | contribs) 14:50, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
Law enforcement agencies in British dependent territories are 'British law enforcement agencies', but not 'law enforcement agencies in the United Kingdom'. We could properly expand the scope of the article to include these agencies, but it would require moving the article to 'List of British law enforcement agencies', and a little rewording. Thoughts? Rob ( talk | contribs) 15:25, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
I would suggest you need to clarify what is meant by 'limited executive powers' and 'purely investigatory'. E.g. Environmental Health and Trading Standards Officers in Local Authorities have powers of entry to business premises without a warrant; powers to seize goods and documents; and, in the EH case, powers to order premises to cease trading temporarily. Both take prosecutions through the local Council without involving the Police or Crown Prosecution Service, up to and including fraud cases 82.26.204.231 ( talk) 19:37, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
This is article is more than a list, and by it nature this topic needs a full article to cover it properly, so I propose moving this page to Law enforcement agencies in the United Kingdom, which is currently a redirect to this page. Any comments from other editors on this move are requested. Whizz40 ( talk) 06:27, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
List of law enforcement agencies in the United Kingdom, Crown dependencies and British Overseas Territories. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 15:49, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Literally a law unto themselves. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:490:A600:1DED:3C54:7DF3:9B88 ( talk) 20:14, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
You are a liar. Even the 'real British police' are unhappy with these uniformed racial Jews-only paramilitary Shorim police force in Britain. Also note the 'Shorim' police car in full official Metropolitan Police colours, but with the word: SHORIM over POLICE... http://www.hamhigh.co.uk/news/crime-court/we_look_nothing_like_police_says_leader_from_golders_green_s_shomrim_response_team_1_4197572 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:490:A600:6146:174B:F9BD:AA2C ( talk) 15:30, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
The title of the wiki page is willfully misleading, these so-called 'neighborhood watch group'. - in Britain, notwithstanding their Jewish headwear, strut about in full police-force uniform and are armed with full police force weaponry and drive about in police cars in fill police livery. Anyway, like I said, this article needs to link to wiki article /info/en/?search=Shomrim_(neighborhood_watch_group) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:490:A600:49E3:6AAA:8A8E:A08A ( talk) 06:08, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on List of law enforcement agencies in the United Kingdom, Crown dependencies and British Overseas Territories. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:48, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on List of law enforcement agencies in the United Kingdom, Crown dependencies and British Overseas Territories. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:37, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
I note that at the bottom of the article there is developing a huge (and growing) list of fictional police forces that have been portrayed in TV, Film and other productions. I'm not really sure that this article is the best place for this list of made up forces. The article is about actual police forces in the United Kingdom along with some detail about juridiction and remit etc. I don't believe this article is the place for a list of fictional forces. My suggestion is to remove the list and if someone wants to create a new article about these fictional forces they are more than welcome but I really don't see the encyclopedic benefit - they don't exist etc - they can be added to the individual film or TV production article if required. Just seems a bizzarre list added to the bottom of this aticle. Thoughts anyone? Bowchaser ( talk) 09:10, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 09:08, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 15:23, 27 March 2023 (UTC)