A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on April 25, 2018, April 25, 2021, April 25, 2023, and April 25, 2024. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Image:LateOttomanFlag.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 23:38, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Made a start on the referencing, tidied page and parachuted a background section from the Gallipoli page. Keith-264 ( talk) 16:54, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Landing at Cape Helles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:11, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
In all the dictionaries that I have consulted (and in the WIKI link) the main defining feature of a trojan horse is the deceit/trick (I am not native english, these words may be sloppy). The enemy nature of the River Clyde was evident, so this rating seems inadequate. pietro06:19, 25 September 2019 (UTC) 151.29.191.205 ( talk)
@ Beshogur: There is consensus to use Ottoman in this series of articles for the reasons given. If you want to change it you will need consensus which you probably won't get by using a source from 1936 and resorting to WP:OR Regards Keith-264 ( talk) 17:36, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
@ Keith-264: please stop editing existing quotes. I placed that a while ago and noticed you changed the quote entirely. I ask to the mistake. "It was the Ottoman empire not the Turkish empire" and "Not just Turks at Gallipoli" is not a valid reason to change a quote. Beshogur ( talk) 17:37, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
there is no need to use a quote if the information is in a source.why not? For verifiability purpose, it's useful.
it is taken from referenced material in the article and using it to excuse "Turkish victory" in place of "Ottoman victory" is a mistakePlease don't put words in my mouth, I don't agree on adding to the infobox "Turkish victory" either. I say that you're editing an existing quote and it's misleading. Also I noticed today, when I checked the note, that the quotation was changed. Beshogur ( talk) 17:52, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
[Edit conflict]
If that wasn't your edit, I apologise, I thought it was.
See Template:Infobox military conflict
If you have added Patton's material to the article and cited it there, citing the addition to the infobox is not necessary. If you really want to keep the Note, I'll put it back with "around it" so it's obvious that it's a quote. Regards Keith-264 ( talk) 18:00, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on April 25, 2018, April 25, 2021, April 25, 2023, and April 25, 2024. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Image:LateOttomanFlag.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 23:38, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Made a start on the referencing, tidied page and parachuted a background section from the Gallipoli page. Keith-264 ( talk) 16:54, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Landing at Cape Helles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:11, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
In all the dictionaries that I have consulted (and in the WIKI link) the main defining feature of a trojan horse is the deceit/trick (I am not native english, these words may be sloppy). The enemy nature of the River Clyde was evident, so this rating seems inadequate. pietro06:19, 25 September 2019 (UTC) 151.29.191.205 ( talk)
@ Beshogur: There is consensus to use Ottoman in this series of articles for the reasons given. If you want to change it you will need consensus which you probably won't get by using a source from 1936 and resorting to WP:OR Regards Keith-264 ( talk) 17:36, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
@ Keith-264: please stop editing existing quotes. I placed that a while ago and noticed you changed the quote entirely. I ask to the mistake. "It was the Ottoman empire not the Turkish empire" and "Not just Turks at Gallipoli" is not a valid reason to change a quote. Beshogur ( talk) 17:37, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
there is no need to use a quote if the information is in a source.why not? For verifiability purpose, it's useful.
it is taken from referenced material in the article and using it to excuse "Turkish victory" in place of "Ottoman victory" is a mistakePlease don't put words in my mouth, I don't agree on adding to the infobox "Turkish victory" either. I say that you're editing an existing quote and it's misleading. Also I noticed today, when I checked the note, that the quotation was changed. Beshogur ( talk) 17:52, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
[Edit conflict]
If that wasn't your edit, I apologise, I thought it was.
See Template:Infobox military conflict
If you have added Patton's material to the article and cited it there, citing the addition to the infobox is not necessary. If you really want to keep the Note, I'll put it back with "around it" so it's obvious that it's a quote. Regards Keith-264 ( talk) 18:00, 15 November 2022 (UTC)