Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Codyorb ( talk · contribs) 17:21, 7 November 2017 (UTC) reply

Commencing GA review for Lake Cahuilla. I'll read through the article and begin reviewing later today. Codyorb ( talk) 17:21, 7 November 2017 (UTC) reply

REVIEW: Sorry for the delay! Here's the review:

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Article is somewhat long, although it's very readable and informative.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a ( reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c ( OR): d ( copyvio and plagiarism):

   All facts verified with citations

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a ( major aspects): b ( focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b ( appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Images are licensed for usage

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Passes. Great work on a great article!