This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Is "micronation" really the best way to describe this? Most people think of that as something small in size, and Araucania & Patagonia covered a large amount of territory. I'm going to change the wording to " a self-proclaimed independent state" from the example of Confederate States of America. -- Infrogmation 00:50, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
According to the article, "King Orelie-Antoine I eventually died penniless in France in 1878 after years of fruitless struggle to regain his perceived legitimate authority over his conquered kingdom." And thus ended the Kingdom. On what basis then, and from what reliable sources, do we have a list of monarchs after this gentleman? -- kingboyk 15:20, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
There's really little reason to edit war on using either the "former country" or "micronation" infobox template. None of them mean whenever this place was one or the other thing. It's just a technical tool to generate a rectangle at the right with useful data. We may discuss which infobox to use if one of them is better in providing the important summary information, or if the other generates redundant, anachronic or wrong information. If both ones are acceptable, the best thing to do would be simply to drop it. MBelgrano ( talk) 03:27, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
The name of the infobox does not matter much, really. There's no need to fight all over again about the same thing; it was not a sovereign state, it was an attempt to create one! The infobox is only used to describe the "kingdom", despite it never came to existence. As far as the information in the rest of the article is correct, the infobox doesn't matter much. Diego Grez ( talk) 17:25, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
Maybe we should classify this as a micronation? The Mapuche and supporters say the kingdom is in exile and its more of a micronation now like Sealand. Spongie555 ( talk) 04:35, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
I haven't heard back from the e-mail contact given at the website. In the meantime, please don't edit-war people. Fainites barley scribs 13:10, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
Really, claim that this Kingdom exist is insane...one man, me for example, go tomorrow to Paris...and say: Paris is the capital of my Kingdom, the Kingdom of Bolivia and France...and that is considered like true??? If this man be a mapuche nobody say that this Kingdom really exist, really is a insult to every Mapuche in this earth...-- 186.62.132.131 ( talk) 16:41, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi there. I just reverted a change in German wiki – Stanislas does not really seem to be prince. It rather is a joke within the joke, so to say. If somebody wants to check it – I did. It's at least fun reading the documents. Find the respective links in the German version. Royal regards, Me I., prince of Wordland, archduke of Spellingham. Or so. -- Andras Corvi ( talk) 21:22, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, Would you please restore the original version of this page before vandalism? The page online is not the original one but a vandalised one. Thanks a lot. Vulson ( talk) 20:43, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Kingdom of Araucanía and Patagonia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:37, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Is "micronation" really the best way to describe this? Most people think of that as something small in size, and Araucania & Patagonia covered a large amount of territory. I'm going to change the wording to " a self-proclaimed independent state" from the example of Confederate States of America. -- Infrogmation 00:50, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
According to the article, "King Orelie-Antoine I eventually died penniless in France in 1878 after years of fruitless struggle to regain his perceived legitimate authority over his conquered kingdom." And thus ended the Kingdom. On what basis then, and from what reliable sources, do we have a list of monarchs after this gentleman? -- kingboyk 15:20, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
There's really little reason to edit war on using either the "former country" or "micronation" infobox template. None of them mean whenever this place was one or the other thing. It's just a technical tool to generate a rectangle at the right with useful data. We may discuss which infobox to use if one of them is better in providing the important summary information, or if the other generates redundant, anachronic or wrong information. If both ones are acceptable, the best thing to do would be simply to drop it. MBelgrano ( talk) 03:27, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
The name of the infobox does not matter much, really. There's no need to fight all over again about the same thing; it was not a sovereign state, it was an attempt to create one! The infobox is only used to describe the "kingdom", despite it never came to existence. As far as the information in the rest of the article is correct, the infobox doesn't matter much. Diego Grez ( talk) 17:25, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
Maybe we should classify this as a micronation? The Mapuche and supporters say the kingdom is in exile and its more of a micronation now like Sealand. Spongie555 ( talk) 04:35, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
I haven't heard back from the e-mail contact given at the website. In the meantime, please don't edit-war people. Fainites barley scribs 13:10, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
Really, claim that this Kingdom exist is insane...one man, me for example, go tomorrow to Paris...and say: Paris is the capital of my Kingdom, the Kingdom of Bolivia and France...and that is considered like true??? If this man be a mapuche nobody say that this Kingdom really exist, really is a insult to every Mapuche in this earth...-- 186.62.132.131 ( talk) 16:41, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi there. I just reverted a change in German wiki – Stanislas does not really seem to be prince. It rather is a joke within the joke, so to say. If somebody wants to check it – I did. It's at least fun reading the documents. Find the respective links in the German version. Royal regards, Me I., prince of Wordland, archduke of Spellingham. Or so. -- Andras Corvi ( talk) 21:22, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, Would you please restore the original version of this page before vandalism? The page online is not the original one but a vandalised one. Thanks a lot. Vulson ( talk) 20:43, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Kingdom of Araucanía and Patagonia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:37, 10 December 2017 (UTC)