Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Howard Gardner article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This
level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This is referenced or is referenced by impication on the Education page ... therefore mid importance (might be high?) Victuallers 13:35, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
this page needs more info on his current status & bio, considering his importance to psychology Wkilis 05:33, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Examples:
Compare this with the Theory of Multiple Intelligences article: need to make clear here that the theory isn't universally accepted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tgramma ( talk • contribs) 06:17, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
I suggest Naturalist Intelligence be merged into this article, anyone object Aspensti 01:26, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
There is no corresponding discussion on Gardner's page concerning the other intelligences. Merging this into the page would create an imbalance of content. I suggest keeping it separate, but labelled as a stub, or creating a larger page with similar detail on all of his suggested intelligences. -- Aaronp808 18:12, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
I agree that adding Naturalist Intelligence creates an imbalance. Especially now that it has been officially added to the "list" (see Intelligence Reframed). Detail concerning the suggested intelligences would add appopriate depth. I further suggest that his work within the realms of creativity, arts, and leadership be expounded. It could also be noted the tremendous influence of Lev Vygotsky, Jerome Bruner, and Nelson Goodman on his work. 74.193.1.242 21:16, 13 January 2007 (UTC)Matthew A. Foster
No, let it stay. I am sure this will grow as other scientists add their two cents. Dane Sorensen
No merge, it will be too confusing. futurebird 04:35, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
This book was published in 2004 that isn't recent. Kendirangu 10:34, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
(deleted personal attack, inaccurate comment) I agree, don't merge —Preceding unsigned comment added by Junewuaunty ( talk • contribs) 07:44, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
In the multiple intelligences section of the page is the following quote:
The last word does not make sense as it's already in the list of eight (naturalist). This maybe should be existential:spiritualist, or should not be there, based on the "Theory of multiple intelligences" page, "other intelligences" section. This suggests that additions to the eight have been considered but not included. As these statements contradict each other, one must be incorrect, although I do not know which. Davini994 ( talk) 20:03, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
I have read several books by Gardner or his collaborators. You may find it helpful while reading or editing articles to look at a bibliography of Intelligence Citations, posted for the use of all Wikipedians who have occasion to edit articles on human intelligence and related issues. I happen to have circulating access to a huge academic research library at a university with an active research program in these issues (and to another library that is one of the ten largest public library systems in the United States) and have been researching these issues since 1989. You are welcome to use these citations for your own research. You can help other Wikipedians by suggesting new sources through comments on that page. It will be extremely helpful for articles on human intelligence to edit them according to the Wikipedia standards for reliable sources for medicine-related articles, as it is important to get these issues as well verified as possible. -- WeijiBaikeBianji ( talk) 20:59, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
This man has made a substantial impact in the field of psychology and education. Is there any chance that there could be more information about this man's history, other than those that cover is most famous achievements. I also would suggest putting up a picture of Gardner so that people can put a face to his name.
Bibliography - Articles for Consideration
http://www.infed.org/thinkers/gardner.htm http://pzweb.harvard.edu/pis/hg.htm
I plan to further evaluate the 7-9(?) intelligences that have been identified by Gardner. I also plan to look at his approach to education, as he has been at Harvard University developing his theories for over two decades now. I believe I can find more about his history as well. Since he is still living I would also like to find his most recent accomplishments. -- Rushdwb ( talk) 22:33, 21 June 2011 (UTC) 6/31/2011 -- Rushdwb ( talk) 20:09, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
I think the wording of this sentence could be better:
Original Sentence -The author of over twenty books translated into over thirty languages, he is best known for his theory of multiple intelligences, as outlined in his book Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences (1983).
My suggestion before editing is:
Gardner is the author of over twenty books having been translated into over thirty languages. He is best known for his theory of multiple intelligences, as outlined in his book Frames Of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences (1983). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kattikat ( talk • contribs) 15:56, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
Can anyone explain how the text in an Indian script (Looks like Hindi to me, but I didn't fact-check this) got into the end of the Theory and Criticism section? Is it just translated, needs translation, or....? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.179.154.234 ( talk) 08:50, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Howard Gardner. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:30, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Howard Gardner article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This
level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This is referenced or is referenced by impication on the Education page ... therefore mid importance (might be high?) Victuallers 13:35, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
this page needs more info on his current status & bio, considering his importance to psychology Wkilis 05:33, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Examples:
Compare this with the Theory of Multiple Intelligences article: need to make clear here that the theory isn't universally accepted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tgramma ( talk • contribs) 06:17, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
I suggest Naturalist Intelligence be merged into this article, anyone object Aspensti 01:26, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
There is no corresponding discussion on Gardner's page concerning the other intelligences. Merging this into the page would create an imbalance of content. I suggest keeping it separate, but labelled as a stub, or creating a larger page with similar detail on all of his suggested intelligences. -- Aaronp808 18:12, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
I agree that adding Naturalist Intelligence creates an imbalance. Especially now that it has been officially added to the "list" (see Intelligence Reframed). Detail concerning the suggested intelligences would add appopriate depth. I further suggest that his work within the realms of creativity, arts, and leadership be expounded. It could also be noted the tremendous influence of Lev Vygotsky, Jerome Bruner, and Nelson Goodman on his work. 74.193.1.242 21:16, 13 January 2007 (UTC)Matthew A. Foster
No, let it stay. I am sure this will grow as other scientists add their two cents. Dane Sorensen
No merge, it will be too confusing. futurebird 04:35, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
This book was published in 2004 that isn't recent. Kendirangu 10:34, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
(deleted personal attack, inaccurate comment) I agree, don't merge —Preceding unsigned comment added by Junewuaunty ( talk • contribs) 07:44, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
In the multiple intelligences section of the page is the following quote:
The last word does not make sense as it's already in the list of eight (naturalist). This maybe should be existential:spiritualist, or should not be there, based on the "Theory of multiple intelligences" page, "other intelligences" section. This suggests that additions to the eight have been considered but not included. As these statements contradict each other, one must be incorrect, although I do not know which. Davini994 ( talk) 20:03, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
I have read several books by Gardner or his collaborators. You may find it helpful while reading or editing articles to look at a bibliography of Intelligence Citations, posted for the use of all Wikipedians who have occasion to edit articles on human intelligence and related issues. I happen to have circulating access to a huge academic research library at a university with an active research program in these issues (and to another library that is one of the ten largest public library systems in the United States) and have been researching these issues since 1989. You are welcome to use these citations for your own research. You can help other Wikipedians by suggesting new sources through comments on that page. It will be extremely helpful for articles on human intelligence to edit them according to the Wikipedia standards for reliable sources for medicine-related articles, as it is important to get these issues as well verified as possible. -- WeijiBaikeBianji ( talk) 20:59, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
This man has made a substantial impact in the field of psychology and education. Is there any chance that there could be more information about this man's history, other than those that cover is most famous achievements. I also would suggest putting up a picture of Gardner so that people can put a face to his name.
Bibliography - Articles for Consideration
http://www.infed.org/thinkers/gardner.htm http://pzweb.harvard.edu/pis/hg.htm
I plan to further evaluate the 7-9(?) intelligences that have been identified by Gardner. I also plan to look at his approach to education, as he has been at Harvard University developing his theories for over two decades now. I believe I can find more about his history as well. Since he is still living I would also like to find his most recent accomplishments. -- Rushdwb ( talk) 22:33, 21 June 2011 (UTC) 6/31/2011 -- Rushdwb ( talk) 20:09, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
I think the wording of this sentence could be better:
Original Sentence -The author of over twenty books translated into over thirty languages, he is best known for his theory of multiple intelligences, as outlined in his book Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences (1983).
My suggestion before editing is:
Gardner is the author of over twenty books having been translated into over thirty languages. He is best known for his theory of multiple intelligences, as outlined in his book Frames Of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences (1983). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kattikat ( talk • contribs) 15:56, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
Can anyone explain how the text in an Indian script (Looks like Hindi to me, but I didn't fact-check this) got into the end of the Theory and Criticism section? Is it just translated, needs translation, or....? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.179.154.234 ( talk) 08:50, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Howard Gardner. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:30, 7 November 2017 (UTC)