This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Afghanistan This article is within the scope of WikiProject Afghanistan, a project to maintain and expand Afghanistan-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AfghanistanWikipedia:WikiProject AfghanistanTemplate:WikiProject AfghanistanAfghanistan articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Iran This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Pakistan Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Central Asia High‑importance History of Bukhara is part of WikiProject Central Asia, a project to improve all Central Asia-related articles. This includes but is not limited to Afghanistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Tajikistan, Tibet, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Xinjiang and Central Asian portions of Iran, Pakistan and Russia, region-specific topics, and anything else related to Central Asia. If you would like to help improve this and other Central Asia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.Central AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Central AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Central AsiaCentral Asia articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Archaeology Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Textile Arts This article is within the scope of WikiProject Textile Arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of textile arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Textile ArtsWikipedia:WikiProject Textile ArtsTemplate:WikiProject Textile ArtsTextile Arts articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

I'm confused by this link... Can someone explain please why this history does not appear here? Victuallers ( talk) 14:43, 23 September 2009 (UTC) reply

The articles cites the following in the Early Islamic era section:

" In the reign of Muawiya (661 to 680) Bukhara was conquered by Qutaiba ibn Muslim ...2 In Bukhara there was a bazar called the bazar of Makh.Twice a year for one day there was a fair ...on the day of the fair when people had gathered all went into the fire and temple and worshipped fire . The fire temple existed to the time of Islam when the Muslims seized the power and built a mosque on that place [8]"

I have the book History of Bukhara by Narshakhi at my hand, and the claims made in this article is inaccurate. It doesn't mention anything of fire temple on page 67. It only mentions there was a "temple" before it, where the Mosque was build.

Regarding the Bazar of Makh, it is mentioned on Pg 25 (Chapter: An account of Bazar of Makh). Twice a year a fair was held here, but idols were sold there. People used to buy idols from one another. This practice continued even after the Islamic times.People continued this practice and sold idols i.e. continued this fair. When Muhammad ibn Jafar visited this place, he was astonished to see people selling idols, so he asked religious scholar (Sheikhs) regarding this matter and they said since this is a practice that has been carried on for generations, it was OK for them to carry it.

Abul Hasin Nishapuri in his book "The Treasury of Sciences" suggests a different story regarding the Bazar of Makh. He suggested that the idol worshippers was later replaced with fire-worshippers, and later fire worshipping (probably along with idol-worshiping) continued. On the day of fair, people used to gather together and worshipped fire.

I will be making changes to this article to reflect it accurately, and fix inaccurate claims. -- Theotherguy1 ( talk) 16:58, 13 June 2010 (UTC) reply

In the history of Bukhara by Narshaki, Richard Nelson Fyre doubts the story of Qutaiba ibn Muslim. In the commentary section of the book, he writes that Qutaiba ibn Muslim didn't live at the time of Ummayyad Caliph Muawiya, but rather much later, so this story is questionable, unless there were two Qutaiba's (two people with same name in different time). This is mentioned on Page 137 of History of Bukhara by Narshaki (Commentary Chapter). -- Theotherguy1 ( talk) 15:45, 13 June 2010 (UTC) reply

In spite of Buddhism playing a very key role in the history of this city, including in giving it the name of Vihara (which later got corrupted to Bukhara), it looks like all previous mentions of Buddhism have been very suspiciously removed from this article. A dangerously ideological re-writing of history taking place here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.36.10.163 ( talk) 05:10, 5 February 2013 (UTC) reply

http://books.google.com/books?id=3XcOAAAAQAAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false

http://books.google.com/books?id=iG8VAAAAQAAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false

http://books.google.com/books?id=lqRDAAAAYAAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false

Rajmaan ( talk) 19:32, 9 January 2013 (UTC) reply

The Mongols continued to use Khitan and Han Chinese to rule Bukhara after their conquest of the Kara-Khanid Khanate.

page 124

http://www.jstor.org/stable/41930343?seq=4

Chinese

page 137

http://www.jstor.org/stable/41930343?seq=17

http://books.google.com/books?id=6KVAAQAAIAAJ&pg=PR1&dq=recensio+numorum+muhammedanorum+academiae+petropolitanae&hl=en&sa=X&ei=mT2uU5GzG46uyAT20oJI&ved=0CCEQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=recensio%20numorum%20muhammedanorum%20academiae%20petropolitanae&f=false

http://www.worldcat.org/title/ch-m-fraehnii-recensio-numorum-muhammedanorum-academiae-imp-scient-petropolitanae-inter-prima-academiae-imp-saecularia-edita/oclc/61810864

Rajmaan ( talk) 22:01, 27 June 2014 (UTC) reply

I saw a link in the history section that seems like its supposed to go to a page about a Mongol tribe but it goes to the page about the United Arab Republic.

Magoo1011 ( talk) 23:51, 22 February 2022 (UTC) reply

A bit like much of Wikipedia you have got to read with caution. This article is a classic example of poor quality propaganda. 2603:7000:4000:36EA:13:A8C0:CDC6:5037 ( talk) 15:23, 3 September 2023 (UTC) reply