This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Judaism This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Please provide context for the use of this term. Jews certainly do not use it, while Sabbatarians do. Any sources, perhaps? JFW |  T@lk 22:29, 28 November 2005 (UTC) reply

At least one Christian did (John 19:31).-- Kevin 02:10, 1 December 2005 (UTC) reply

A High Day is a Sabbath and a Feast on the same day. 2607:FB91:1C9E:90F2:28C0:3870:EF9:D878 ( talk) 10:49, 28 June 2023 (UTC) reply

I think we should mention that the term is not in use by Jews. High Holidays only recently became used by Jews, but High Sabbath never caught on. Valley2city 16:49, 12 October 2006 (UTC) reply

The term "High Sabbath" has a different definition than the single definition given in this stub by the "High Sabbath Adventist Movement." Jackcrew 12:23, 27 September 2014 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on High Sabbaths. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130407031045/http://www.fossilizedcustoms.com/SEVENANNUALSABBATHS.htm to http://www.fossilizedcustoms.com/SEVENANNUALSABBATHS.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:32, 2 April 2017 (UTC) reply