This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United Kingdom Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. England Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Lancashire and Cumbria Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lancashire and Cumbria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lancashire and CumbriaWikipedia:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaTemplate:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaLancashire and Cumbria articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. Architecture: Historic houses Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Historic houses task force (assessed as Low-importance). This article has been marked as needing an infobox. Historic sites Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Wikipedians in Cumbria may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Non-stable source, and a non-free image, but gives an idea: [1]. Surprised there are no images at geograph. Seems there is also now another property there [2] as follows:" The Stables and adjacent Coach House were created from the ancillary buildings, each of equally substantial high quality construction dated 1884. Transformed by the skilled imagination of Kendal architects 'Ted Fletcher'.." Martinevans123 ( talk) 16:52, 2 December 2012 (UTC) reply

I'm not surprised. Private properties, bring private, frequently do not have free-to-use photographs. I do not see a "problem" (!). -- Peter I. Vardy ( talk) 19:39, 2 December 2012 (UTC) reply

Good. Not sure I do either. Bit surprised it's now flats, though. Martinevans123 ( talk) 20:11, 2 December 2012 (UTC) reply

Happens frequently to large properties that are too big to be sustained as a single residence. -- Peter I. Vardy ( talk) 21:50, 2 December 2012 (UTC) reply

Even in classy Cumbria, it seems. And the next Wiki Project: Estate Agents category... Category:Multiple Occupancy Paley and Austin Residences, perhaps? Martinevans123 ( talk) 22:03, 2 December 2012 (UTC) reply