This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Record Labels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
record labels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Record LabelsWikipedia:WikiProject Record LabelsTemplate:WikiProject Record Labelsrecord labels articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
I have no issue with it being renamed. I created the category page. I just noticed in trade magazines and
Discogs that there is a space as per Discogs'
H & L Records. Perhaps the Wikipedia arrticle needs to be moved to H & L Records as opposed to H&L Records. Anyway, I'll leave it up to what you guys think best. Cheers
Karl Twist (
talk) 06:39, 25 March 2023 (UTC)reply
AllMusic uses "H&L", but the citations from Billboard, Bull Trax Records and Both Sides Now (as well as Discogs) all use "H & L", so I suggest we move the article to the spaced version per
Karl Twist. –
FayenaticLondon 15:44, 25 March 2023 (UTC)reply
I don't think we need an RM. If we agree here, we can just move the page; all the pages will then be consistent, and the category nominations can be withdrawn. –
FayenaticLondon 20:38, 27 March 2023 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Record Labels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
record labels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Record LabelsWikipedia:WikiProject Record LabelsTemplate:WikiProject Record Labelsrecord labels articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
I have no issue with it being renamed. I created the category page. I just noticed in trade magazines and
Discogs that there is a space as per Discogs'
H & L Records. Perhaps the Wikipedia arrticle needs to be moved to H & L Records as opposed to H&L Records. Anyway, I'll leave it up to what you guys think best. Cheers
Karl Twist (
talk) 06:39, 25 March 2023 (UTC)reply
AllMusic uses "H&L", but the citations from Billboard, Bull Trax Records and Both Sides Now (as well as Discogs) all use "H & L", so I suggest we move the article to the spaced version per
Karl Twist. –
FayenaticLondon 15:44, 25 March 2023 (UTC)reply
I don't think we need an RM. If we agree here, we can just move the page; all the pages will then be consistent, and the category nominations can be withdrawn. –
FayenaticLondon 20:38, 27 March 2023 (UTC)reply