This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States: Nebraska Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Nebraska. Schools Low‑importance This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Wikipedians in Nebraska may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

I see that an source was added regarding the incident with the deaf student. That's helpful, but it seems like a relatively small incident in the grand scheme of things - the sort of boneheaded move that schools everywhere seem to make from time to time and which receive fleeting new coverage. I don't think anyone - including the source - could really claim that this is what school district is best know for. I wouldn't be opposed to perhaps adding this in a "controversies" section, but I would need to less strident.-- Kubigula ( talk) 03:48, 30 August 2012 (UTC) reply

Had you or anyone outside of Grand island even ever heard of this place prior to this incident making the NATIONAL news. I'd note that as "best known!" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.105.118.42 ( talk) 21:04, 31 August 2012 (UTC) reply

We try to take a longer view of these things. It may be "best known" for a month or two, but it will not have any lasting impact. Something like this will be totally forgotten in a year or less.-- Kubigula ( talk) 17:00, 1 September 2012 (UTC) reply

An encyclopedia should not be a place where bad policy, dumb ideas or errors should be enshrined as a wall of shame: as Kubigula says, we should take a broader view and focus on enduring facts. We have this as policy on biographies, and it's a reasonable position to take on other topics. We often encounter such narrowly-focused edits about schools or school systems, and they are almost always of no lasting consequence. Acroterion (talk) 17:27, 1 September 2012 (UTC) reply