 | Golf Story has been listed as one of the
Video games good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: October 20, 2020. ( Reviewed version). |
@ Sergecross73: Are there specific notability guidelines for video games? Wicka wicka ( talk) 14:02, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
-
WP:VG/GL has plenty of notes on how to write articles, but notability-wise, it mostly just operates on the
general notability guidelines, which isn't met with a one sentence, one barely reliable source article.
Sergecross73
msg me 14:04, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
- @
Sergecross73: Can you also tell me if the article still requires more citations, or can the box at the top be removed? Thanks!
Wicka wicka (
talk) 16:03, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
- Yup, its good now. Sergecross73 msg me 17:26, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
- @
Sergecross73: Can you also tell me if the article still requires more citations, or can the box at the top be removed? Thanks!
Wicka wicka (
talk) 16:03, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
It's been a couple months now and it seems that the article has been cleaned up. Also seems to be more start-class. Epicandrew1220 ( talk) 17:19, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Golf Story/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: ImaginesTigers ( talk · contribs) 13:01, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
Tagging this one. Except the full review to be posted on Wednesday (rather than in chunks).
ImaginesTigers (
talk) 13:01, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi, Lee. Let's get this show on the road. ImaginesTigers ( talk) 13:33, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
This should be fairly straightforward. A few minor concerns. ImaginesTigers ( talk) 13:33, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- A few suggestions (see Prose). I've implemented all but one of them. Structurally, the article is in good shape. ImaginesTigers ( talk)
- B. It complies with the
manual of style guidelines for
lead sections,
layout,
words to watch,
fiction, and
list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it
verifiable with no original research?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
the layout style guideline:
- B. All
in-line citations are from
reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or
likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the
scientific citation guidelines:
- C. It contains
no original research:
- D. It contains no
copyright violations nor
plagiarism:
- Copyvio is down, but will revisit later.
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the
main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays
focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see
summary style):
- A. It addresses the
main aspects of the topic:
- Is it
neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by
images?
- A. Images are
tagged with their
copyright status, and
valid fair use rationales are provided for
non-free content:
- B. Images are
relevant to the topic, and have
suitable captions:
- A. Images are
tagged with their
copyright status, and
valid fair use rationales are provided for
non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Prose
- From the lead:
Originally designed as a Wii U game, it was later released for the Switch due to a lengthy development time and gained assistance from Nintendo to create the game.
The subject of this sentence isn't clear. "It was later released for the Switch [...] and gained assistance from Nintendo". Minor re-jiggling needed.- I've made a reword. I'll agree it is a bit of an odd phrase. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ( talk • contribs) 16:21, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
Also from the lead:critics praising the games' tone
, should be game's.A sequel is currently in development for the Switch, named Sports Story with [...]
->A sequel, Sports Story, is currently in development.
[...] originally in development as a Wii U title by Sidebar Games'
->Sidebar Games
- This was a straightforward one after all. Promoting. ImaginesTigers ( talk) 20:00, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
|
| Golf Story has been listed as one of the
Video games good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: October 20, 2020. ( Reviewed version). |
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
@ Sergecross73: Are there specific notability guidelines for video games? Wicka wicka ( talk) 14:02, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
-
WP:VG/GL has plenty of notes on how to write articles, but notability-wise, it mostly just operates on the
general notability guidelines, which isn't met with a one sentence, one barely reliable source article.
Sergecross73
msg me 14:04, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
- @
Sergecross73: Can you also tell me if the article still requires more citations, or can the box at the top be removed? Thanks!
Wicka wicka (
talk) 16:03, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
- Yup, its good now. Sergecross73 msg me 17:26, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
- @
Sergecross73: Can you also tell me if the article still requires more citations, or can the box at the top be removed? Thanks!
Wicka wicka (
talk) 16:03, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
It's been a couple months now and it seems that the article has been cleaned up. Also seems to be more start-class. Epicandrew1220 ( talk) 17:19, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Golf Story/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: ImaginesTigers ( talk · contribs) 13:01, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
Tagging this one. Except the full review to be posted on Wednesday (rather than in chunks).
ImaginesTigers (
talk) 13:01, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi, Lee. Let's get this show on the road. ImaginesTigers ( talk) 13:33, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
This should be fairly straightforward. A few minor concerns. ImaginesTigers ( talk) 13:33, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- A few suggestions (see Prose). I've implemented all but one of them. Structurally, the article is in good shape. ImaginesTigers ( talk)
- B. It complies with the
manual of style guidelines for
lead sections,
layout,
words to watch,
fiction, and
list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it
verifiable with no original research?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
the layout style guideline:
- B. All
in-line citations are from
reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or
likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the
scientific citation guidelines:
- C. It contains
no original research:
- D. It contains no
copyright violations nor
plagiarism:
- Copyvio is down, but will revisit later.
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the
main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays
focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see
summary style):
- A. It addresses the
main aspects of the topic:
- Is it
neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by
images?
- A. Images are
tagged with their
copyright status, and
valid fair use rationales are provided for
non-free content:
- B. Images are
relevant to the topic, and have
suitable captions:
- A. Images are
tagged with their
copyright status, and
valid fair use rationales are provided for
non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Prose
- From the lead:
Originally designed as a Wii U game, it was later released for the Switch due to a lengthy development time and gained assistance from Nintendo to create the game.
The subject of this sentence isn't clear. "It was later released for the Switch [...] and gained assistance from Nintendo". Minor re-jiggling needed.- I've made a reword. I'll agree it is a bit of an odd phrase. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ( talk • contribs) 16:21, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
Also from the lead:critics praising the games' tone
, should be game's.A sequel is currently in development for the Switch, named Sports Story with [...]
->A sequel, Sports Story, is currently in development.
[...] originally in development as a Wii U title by Sidebar Games'
->Sidebar Games
- This was a straightforward one after all. Promoting. ImaginesTigers ( talk) 20:00, 20 October 2020 (UTC)