This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Business Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Does this have anything to do with the goldcorp challenge, if so why is it not written here? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.199.104.230 ( talk) 08:19, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply

On June 21 use Ttoddler deleted the sections of this article that contained detailed discussions of two of the Goldcorp mines, noting that the inclusion of two of their 14 mines was unbalanced, and that much of the information was from Anti-mining groups. I am moving the Marlin mine section to a new article on Marlin. While this section was clearly started by anti-mining people, I have spent a lot of hours adding further discussion to make it more neutral - and in fact to illustrate how such divergent information appears on many mines. I agree that it makes more sense for mines to be in separate articles from the companies that own them. DiligentDavidG ( talk) 12:37, 21 June 2010 (UTC) reply

The book Wikinomics by Don tapscott, uses Goldcorp's opening it's data on the internet as a big example, of how open data works. As I look into this deeper I will put it on this page, then on the main page. 67.211.144.2 ( talk) 13:50, 14 September 2009 (UTC) reply

Now considering writing (well working in my spare time) on the addition to this article about how the at the Red Lake, Ontario mine opened it’s geology data like Linux “Open source”. The idea was form Rob McEwen, then CEO. 67.211.144.2 ( talk) 19:22, 23 September 2009 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Goldcorp. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120308142642/http://www.ctv.ca/CTVNews/WFive/20100415/w5_paradise_lost_100415/ to http://www.ctv.ca/CTVNews/WFive/20100415/w5_paradise_lost_100415/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120308142642/http://www.ctv.ca/CTVNews/WFive/20100415/w5_paradise_lost_100415/ to http://www.ctv.ca/CTVNews/WFive/20100415/w5_paradise_lost_100415/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:20, 14 January 2018 (UTC) reply