This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Economics This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles Finance & Investment This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles Articles for creation This redirect was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles This redirect was accepted on 10 February 2014 by reviewer J73364 ( talk · contribs).

This article was nominated for deletion on 10 February 2015. The result of the discussion was redirect to Gold bug.

This article pushes the theory and several books (with positive praise), but does not offer a balanced perspective. Besides the three authors, how many economists subscribe to the theory? How is it received/regarded by the majority of economists? Blanket statements like "Modern currencies are based on debt - all of them" need reliable citations. Lastly, several of the references seem of questionable reliability. The theory itself needs more coverage in a neutral tone, not the books and authors (use them as references if needed). --Animalparty-- ( talk) 01:21, 12 February 2014 (UTC) reply

I'm not sure is gold war is the best term for countries completing to own gold? I've found a link which mentions currency and gold wars independently of the books, would goldbroker.com be a suitable reference, they obvious have a vested interest in hyping gold. https://www.goldbroker.com/news/gold-wars-united-states-china-russia-406.html Jonpatterns ( talk) 10:50, 12 February 2014 (UTC) reply

The article should be broken up into articles on the individual books, then these articles should be nominated for deletion to see if they're actually notable. Volunteer Marek ( talk) 11:20, 12 February 2014 (UTC) reply

There is a concept that is independent to the books. But I don't think 'Gold Wars' quite covers it. Firstly, only the US is alleged to be protecting a the US dollar. So maybe a renaming would be more appropriate. Something along the lines of 'United States manipulating Gold price theory'. It can be added in the article that it is sometimes referred to as the 'Gold Wars'. Also it may be appropriate to add information from this article to National_wealth Gold#Investment and Gold_as_an_investment. Jonpatterns ( talk) 12:21, 12 February 2014 (UTC) reply

This is a pretty naked WP:PROFRINGE article that relies on FRINGE sources. - Ad Orientem ( talk) 22:53, 9 February 2015 (UTC) reply

Many references have been added, yet still the redirect is put in place. This is not appropriate. The changes should be discussed before reverting to a redirect. These are MAINSTREAM sources. Misterkel ( talk) 01:32, 10 February 2015 (UTC) reply

No one reverted this to a redirect. It was reverted to the point before you added all of your Pro-Fringe clucka. If you continue to thumb your nose at guidelines and policy you may be asked to defend yourself at ANI. I sincerely hope that will not be necessary. - Ad Orientem ( talk) 01:46, 10 February 2015 (UTC) reply

There is currently a discussion regarding this article at the Fringe Theories Noticeboard. Interested editors are encouraged to join the discussion which may be found here. - Ad Orientem ( talk) 23:10, 9 February 2015 (UTC) reply