This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
G. Edward Griffin article. This is
not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
The
contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been
designated as a contentious topic.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
science,
pseudoscience,
pseudohistory and
skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the
discussion.Alternative ViewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative ViewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative ViewsAlternative Views articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan articles
As several of the alleged "conspiracy theories" have now been proved to be true...
... should we not revisit this, and remove the inappropriate language, and obviously political labelling?
37.189.169.148 (
talk) 07:07, 28 April 2023 (UTC)reply
Your sources? Per
WP:EXCEPTIONAL: "Any exceptional claim requires multiple high-quality sources."
JimRenge (
talk) 10:27, 28 April 2023 (UTC)reply
Careful, you'll get banned for a week like I did.
72.36.47.247 (
talk) 21:02, 25 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Jim's response is more to the point. --
Hob Gadling (
talk) 06:49, 26 August 2023 (UTC)reply
This entire article is radical communist leftist nonsense with no references or facts to support any claims.
2601:2C3:867F:4760:397D:805C:C5AD:7B81 (
talk) 22:17, 27 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Wow, unsupported statement, following by bizarre ad hominem, followed by "COMMIES!", and not a single actual source or reference, just abuse. --
Orange Mike |
Talk 00:15, 28 August 2023 (UTC)reply
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
G. Edward Griffin article. This is
not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
The
contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been
designated as a contentious topic.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
science,
pseudoscience,
pseudohistory and
skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the
discussion.Alternative ViewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative ViewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative ViewsAlternative Views articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan articles
As several of the alleged "conspiracy theories" have now been proved to be true...
... should we not revisit this, and remove the inappropriate language, and obviously political labelling?
37.189.169.148 (
talk) 07:07, 28 April 2023 (UTC)reply
Your sources? Per
WP:EXCEPTIONAL: "Any exceptional claim requires multiple high-quality sources."
JimRenge (
talk) 10:27, 28 April 2023 (UTC)reply
Careful, you'll get banned for a week like I did.
72.36.47.247 (
talk) 21:02, 25 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Jim's response is more to the point. --
Hob Gadling (
talk) 06:49, 26 August 2023 (UTC)reply
This entire article is radical communist leftist nonsense with no references or facts to support any claims.
2601:2C3:867F:4760:397D:805C:C5AD:7B81 (
talk) 22:17, 27 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Wow, unsupported statement, following by bizarre ad hominem, followed by "COMMIES!", and not a single actual source or reference, just abuse. --
Orange Mike |
Talk 00:15, 28 August 2023 (UTC)reply