This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Comedy Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force. United States: Television / Seattle This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by American television task force. This article is supported by WikiProject Washington - Seattle.

Should we merge this with a similar article on the same episode?

Asuyuka ( talk) 23:48, 15 September 2009 (UTC) reply

I think the episodes I have prosposed should be merged as all lack independent reliable third person sources to justify solo articles. Dwanyewest ( talk) 00:09, 26 January 2011 (UTC) reply

I agree, maybe except for the first episode. -- Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars ( talk) 01:26, 27 February 2011 (UTC) reply

It's done-- GroovySandwich 07:10, 8 August 2011 (UTC) reply

I believe the remainder of episodes should be merged. Dwanyewest ( talk) 17:38, 1 November 2011 (UTC) reply

"The Good Son" episode having won 3 major awards i find grounds for NOT merging it. It would be merged into nothingness. delirious & lost ☯ ^~hugs~ 14:47, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply

I concur that this episode must retain its own article.-- TonyTheTiger ( T/ C/ BIO/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:FOUR) 19:46, 28 February 2012 (UTC) reply

99.244.151.88, would you please use this talk page to discuss why you think adding trivial notes about a particular actor's sexuality is a good idea? -- SchrutedIt08 ( talk) 06:48, 21 February 2014 (UTC) reply