Fishing cat is currently a Biology and medicine good article nominee. Nominated by Wolverine XI ( talk to me) at 17:43, 5 April 2024 (UTC) Anyone who has not contributed significantly to (or nominated) this article may review it according to the good article criteria to decide whether or not to list it as a good article. To start the review process, click start review and save the page. (See here for the good article instructions.) Note: Information is really lacking on this species Short description: Small wild cat |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Fishing cat article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 365 days |
This
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
There is a request, submitted by Catfurball, for an audio version of this article to be created. For further information, see WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia. The rationale behind the request is: "Important". |
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
From various secondary sources, I have found recently that fishing cat is classified as Endangered not vulnerable. Anyone please confirm and change its status. Heba Aisha ( talk) 10:04, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
various secondary sourcesare websites that have not been updated since 2016. I've seen a blog referring to the outdated status. -- BhagyaMani ( talk) 15:34, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Nominator: Wolverine XI ( talk · contribs)
Reviewer: Grungaloo ( talk · contribs) 00:17, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi
Wolverine XI, I can tell you've put a lot of work into this article but it looks like it's missing some information. A search on Google Scholar brings some more detailed information on it's hunting and feeding habits, along with other studies that aren't used here. Also, the IUCN has a lot of information on the threats and population which aren't used here. There's no mention of humans hunting them for food. I'd also expect some information on
predators and
parasites. Unfortunately I believe this is a quickfail, however once you've addressed the broadness issue I recommend you re-submit.
grungaloo (
talk) 00:27, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Nominator: Wolverine XI ( talk · contribs)
Reviewer: Fritzmann2002 ( talk · contribs) 15:26, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Wolverine XI, in the less than 14 hours since the review was last quickfailed, the article has not had substantive change per the feedback of
Grungaloo. The only addition was a section on infections. The article still has the same major gaps in content, in particular: interactions with humans, hunting patterns, feeding, parental care, and information from the IUCN. Furthermore, a lot of the language is highly technical and difficult to read. As just one example, "There is evidence that the nominate taxon and the Javan fishing cat are distinguishable by skull morphometrics" is unbroachable to anyone who is not an expert in taxonomy. Please take time to address these concerns before nominating the article again, and please refrain from re-nominating any article so quickly without making substantive improvements after a quickfail.
Fritzmann (
message me) 15:26, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Fishing cat is currently a Biology and medicine good article nominee. Nominated by Wolverine XI ( talk to me) at 17:43, 5 April 2024 (UTC) Anyone who has not contributed significantly to (or nominated) this article may review it according to the good article criteria to decide whether or not to list it as a good article. To start the review process, click start review and save the page. (See here for the good article instructions.) Note: Information is really lacking on this species Short description: Small wild cat |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Fishing cat article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 365 days |
This
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
There is a request, submitted by Catfurball, for an audio version of this article to be created. For further information, see WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia. The rationale behind the request is: "Important". |
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
From various secondary sources, I have found recently that fishing cat is classified as Endangered not vulnerable. Anyone please confirm and change its status. Heba Aisha ( talk) 10:04, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
various secondary sourcesare websites that have not been updated since 2016. I've seen a blog referring to the outdated status. -- BhagyaMani ( talk) 15:34, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Nominator: Wolverine XI ( talk · contribs)
Reviewer: Grungaloo ( talk · contribs) 00:17, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi
Wolverine XI, I can tell you've put a lot of work into this article but it looks like it's missing some information. A search on Google Scholar brings some more detailed information on it's hunting and feeding habits, along with other studies that aren't used here. Also, the IUCN has a lot of information on the threats and population which aren't used here. There's no mention of humans hunting them for food. I'd also expect some information on
predators and
parasites. Unfortunately I believe this is a quickfail, however once you've addressed the broadness issue I recommend you re-submit.
grungaloo (
talk) 00:27, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Nominator: Wolverine XI ( talk · contribs)
Reviewer: Fritzmann2002 ( talk · contribs) 15:26, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Wolverine XI, in the less than 14 hours since the review was last quickfailed, the article has not had substantive change per the feedback of
Grungaloo. The only addition was a section on infections. The article still has the same major gaps in content, in particular: interactions with humans, hunting patterns, feeding, parental care, and information from the IUCN. Furthermore, a lot of the language is highly technical and difficult to read. As just one example, "There is evidence that the nominate taxon and the Javan fishing cat are distinguishable by skull morphometrics" is unbroachable to anyone who is not an expert in taxonomy. Please take time to address these concerns before nominating the article again, and please refrain from re-nominating any article so quickly without making substantive improvements after a quickfail.
Fritzmann (
message me) 15:26, 28 March 2024 (UTC)