This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Is it sufficient that this just links to the real events page? phocks ( talk) 04:48, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
About a week ago 24.28.28.230 added Robert Baumgartner to cinematography field. IMDB only has one credit in Cinematography section "Doug Liman (director of photography)". IMDB has Baumgartner as "camera operator" "director of photography: second unit" and "lighting camera". Does the "director of photography: second unit" credit qualiy Baumgartner to be included in Cinematography field? -- EarthFurst ( talk) 09:49, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
The editor at 76.182.42.242 has been adding a bunch more information to the "Historical accuracy" section, which I keep reverting. While I appreciate the effort to make the section comprehensive, I think it's mis-focused. This article is about the film, not the underlying events, and so I think every piece of information in the section, and every source cited, needs to in some way relate to the film. The new added text includes information like the details of Scooter Libby's jail sentence, and the State Department's view of the uranium allegations - interesting information, but I don't think it's usable here, because it's not mentioned in any of the commentaries/reviews of the film. Instead, it looks to me like classic synthesis - piecing together facts from different sources to make a point (here, about the film's accuracy) that none of the original sources do. Korny O'Near ( talk) 15:22, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
Guys, before I start this, could somebody view this link in the Washington Post:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/13/AR2006091302066.html
It claims that:
"Novak did not identify his sources, but Armitage admitted publicly for the first time last week that he was one. White House political adviser Karl Rove earlier confirmed he was the other."
Shouldn't we change the line in the article which says:
"There is however, no evidence of Karl Rove's involvement to date"
?
-- Bertrc ( talk) 21:03, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
To add to this article: where the Niger scenes were filmed. 98.123.38.211 ( talk) 01:23, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
To clarify in this article: are the Mr. Tabir and Hafiz characters based on real people Plame was interacting with prior to her cover being blown? 98.123.38.211 ( talk) 01:30, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Is it sufficient that this just links to the real events page? phocks ( talk) 04:48, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
About a week ago 24.28.28.230 added Robert Baumgartner to cinematography field. IMDB only has one credit in Cinematography section "Doug Liman (director of photography)". IMDB has Baumgartner as "camera operator" "director of photography: second unit" and "lighting camera". Does the "director of photography: second unit" credit qualiy Baumgartner to be included in Cinematography field? -- EarthFurst ( talk) 09:49, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
The editor at 76.182.42.242 has been adding a bunch more information to the "Historical accuracy" section, which I keep reverting. While I appreciate the effort to make the section comprehensive, I think it's mis-focused. This article is about the film, not the underlying events, and so I think every piece of information in the section, and every source cited, needs to in some way relate to the film. The new added text includes information like the details of Scooter Libby's jail sentence, and the State Department's view of the uranium allegations - interesting information, but I don't think it's usable here, because it's not mentioned in any of the commentaries/reviews of the film. Instead, it looks to me like classic synthesis - piecing together facts from different sources to make a point (here, about the film's accuracy) that none of the original sources do. Korny O'Near ( talk) 15:22, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
Guys, before I start this, could somebody view this link in the Washington Post:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/13/AR2006091302066.html
It claims that:
"Novak did not identify his sources, but Armitage admitted publicly for the first time last week that he was one. White House political adviser Karl Rove earlier confirmed he was the other."
Shouldn't we change the line in the article which says:
"There is however, no evidence of Karl Rove's involvement to date"
?
-- Bertrc ( talk) 21:03, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
To add to this article: where the Niger scenes were filmed. 98.123.38.211 ( talk) 01:23, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
To clarify in this article: are the Mr. Tabir and Hafiz characters based on real people Plame was interacting with prior to her cover being blown? 98.123.38.211 ( talk) 01:30, 14 April 2024 (UTC)