This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Electric Aircraft Corporation ElectraFlyer Trike article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
I have no connection whatsoever with the company making this aircraft. I think it's actually a revolutionary product: an electric airplane capable of carrying a human for 2 hours. It's definitely worthy of a Wikipedia article; I don't want to make it an advertisement for the company though. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jdoniach ( talk • contribs)
Indeed this is a significant milestone in sport aviation. the wikipedia entry should exist, but I agree the article could do with some improving. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.45.14.120 ( talk)
I notice this article is a member of category:Flying_wing_aircraft. But to me it just looks like any other ultralight trike. Are all ultralight trikes flying wings? The Ultralight Trike article is a member of category:Delta-Wing_Aircraft, not flying wing. We should standardise this. Roidroid ( talk) 03:43, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Electric Aircraft Corporation ElectraFlyer Trike article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
I have no connection whatsoever with the company making this aircraft. I think it's actually a revolutionary product: an electric airplane capable of carrying a human for 2 hours. It's definitely worthy of a Wikipedia article; I don't want to make it an advertisement for the company though. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jdoniach ( talk • contribs)
Indeed this is a significant milestone in sport aviation. the wikipedia entry should exist, but I agree the article could do with some improving. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.45.14.120 ( talk)
I notice this article is a member of category:Flying_wing_aircraft. But to me it just looks like any other ultralight trike. Are all ultralight trikes flying wings? The Ultralight Trike article is a member of category:Delta-Wing_Aircraft, not flying wing. We should standardise this. Roidroid ( talk) 03:43, 21 December 2010 (UTC)