This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Ebionites article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Ebionites is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on July 9, 2007. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Index
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6,
7,
8,
9,
10 11 |
Peer Review Archive |
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
Why have opinion of non muslims have been quoted under heading of Islam. it's distortion. editor to address this issue Rashid37009 ( talk) 06:55, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
A segment of text was removed: "In a 2007 polemic, a Messianic writer asked whether Christians should imitate the Torah observance and acceptance of rabbinic understanding of "neo-Ebionites", who are defined as those who accept Jesus as Messiah, reject Paul and claim Moses as the only guide for Christians. [1]" by User:Lovemankind83 with this text:"Hast nothing to do with the articles subject"
Contact the editor: mail: /info/en/?search=Special:EmailUser/Lovemankind83 wiki: /info/en/?search=User:Lovemankind83
Should not that topic not be included in the article somehow, somewhere? MaynardClark ( talk) 18:48, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
References
{{
cite journal}}
: Cite journal requires |journal=
(
help)
The below passage (within subsection Jesus, which is by the way a poor choice for a heading) references works of Hyam Maccoby. His works are widely rejected by modern scholars and considered non-historical polemics against Paul and the early church without reasonable substance. I recommend this whole passage to be removed. To me this sounds like an anachronistic reading of history favouring obscure sources to peddle the highly debatable notion that mainstream trinitarian Christianity is an aberration of the 'real' teachings of Jesus. This deceptive rhetoric usually emphasise the 'Oneness of God' (buzzword) as a central Ebionite dogma but completely ignores teachings that are contradicting established christianity/islam as e.g. the rejection of the virgin birth. It seems to me that this has been written to discredit trinitarian Christianity solely and not the offer an impartial view on the history of Ebionites without presupposition or dogma.
The Ebionites are described as emphasizing the oneness of God and the humanity of Jesus as the biological son of Mary and Joseph, who, by virtue of his righteousness, was chosen by God to be the messianic "prophet like Moses" (foretold in Deuteronomy 18:14–22) when he was anointed with the Holy Spirit at his baptism.[4] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.219.94.138 ( talk) 10:49, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
I suggest that all contributors to the Ebionites article follow the example of the Gospel of the Ebionites article when it comes to notes, citations and sources from now on. So we have a lot of work to do. :) —- Loremaster ( talk) 15:53, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Ebionites article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Ebionites is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on July 9, 2007. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Index
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6,
7,
8,
9,
10 11 |
Peer Review Archive |
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
Why have opinion of non muslims have been quoted under heading of Islam. it's distortion. editor to address this issue Rashid37009 ( talk) 06:55, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
A segment of text was removed: "In a 2007 polemic, a Messianic writer asked whether Christians should imitate the Torah observance and acceptance of rabbinic understanding of "neo-Ebionites", who are defined as those who accept Jesus as Messiah, reject Paul and claim Moses as the only guide for Christians. [1]" by User:Lovemankind83 with this text:"Hast nothing to do with the articles subject"
Contact the editor: mail: /info/en/?search=Special:EmailUser/Lovemankind83 wiki: /info/en/?search=User:Lovemankind83
Should not that topic not be included in the article somehow, somewhere? MaynardClark ( talk) 18:48, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
References
{{
cite journal}}
: Cite journal requires |journal=
(
help)
The below passage (within subsection Jesus, which is by the way a poor choice for a heading) references works of Hyam Maccoby. His works are widely rejected by modern scholars and considered non-historical polemics against Paul and the early church without reasonable substance. I recommend this whole passage to be removed. To me this sounds like an anachronistic reading of history favouring obscure sources to peddle the highly debatable notion that mainstream trinitarian Christianity is an aberration of the 'real' teachings of Jesus. This deceptive rhetoric usually emphasise the 'Oneness of God' (buzzword) as a central Ebionite dogma but completely ignores teachings that are contradicting established christianity/islam as e.g. the rejection of the virgin birth. It seems to me that this has been written to discredit trinitarian Christianity solely and not the offer an impartial view on the history of Ebionites without presupposition or dogma.
The Ebionites are described as emphasizing the oneness of God and the humanity of Jesus as the biological son of Mary and Joseph, who, by virtue of his righteousness, was chosen by God to be the messianic "prophet like Moses" (foretold in Deuteronomy 18:14–22) when he was anointed with the Holy Spirit at his baptism.[4] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.219.94.138 ( talk) 10:49, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
I suggest that all contributors to the Ebionites article follow the example of the Gospel of the Ebionites article when it comes to notes, citations and sources from now on. So we have a lot of work to do. :) —- Loremaster ( talk) 15:53, 26 August 2020 (UTC)