This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Dumuzid article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Dumuzid has been listed as one of the
Philosophy and religion good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: February 20, 2018. ( Reviewed version). |
This
level-5 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I deleted the section with the above title as a clear copyright violation. It's quoted a number of places on the web and I can't locate the original source, but it appears in a post dated from 2006 here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/caner/314998602/ where it's attributed to one Michael Himick at http://www.artknowledgenews.com/?q=node/1412 which is a dead link. Since we don't know who this is we can't assume he's a reliable source or if the quote was even original to him, so we can't even use the information until it can be verified elsewhere. 192.31.106.36 ( talk) 05:53, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Dumuzid the Shepherd. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:14, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
I think that Tammuz (mythology) should be merged into this article because "Tammuz" is just a later Semitic spelling of "Dumuzid" and the two names refer to exactly the same figure. I would have just merged the two articles myself, but, unfortunately, I have discovered that people become really angry with me when I do that, so I am putting up this merge proposal. -- Katolophyromai ( talk) 21:34, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Iazyges ( talk · contribs) 03:57, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Will start soon. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 03:57, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
GA Criteria
|
---|
GA Criteria:
|
*The refs Burkert 1985 and Detienne 1972 have no corresponding citations.
*In Sumerian myth, Dumuzid's sister was Geshtinanna, suggest In Sumerian mythology, Dumuzid's sister was Geshtinanna,, unless there is only one myth in which she is mentioned, which seems unlikely.
*not usually be stored without spoiling. suggest not easily be stored without spoiling.
In "Myths from Mesopotamia: Creation, The Flood, Gilgamesh, and Others" Stephanie Dalley says that Dumuzi dies and resurrects but the article says he doesn't.
"The Sumerian version, The Descent of Inanna, is attested earlier, and is much longer, consisting of some 410 lines. It is a fuller, more detailed account, and shows clearly that Dumuzi periodically died and rose, causing seasonal fertility, a fact which had been doubted until 1963, when a newly published fragment disclosed the crucial evidence." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blebnh ( talk • contribs) 05:17, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
Somethings wrong with Kramer, 1966. I tried correcting the format from "article=" to "title=" but a template error keeps occurring: Warning: Dumuzid is calling Template:Citation with more than one value for the "title" parameter. Only the last value provided will be used. — JudeccaXIII ( talk) 17:52, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
The reference #29 listed currently shows a preview of the book Ishtar by Louise Pryke, however it links to a google search page with the term "Ninshubur gender" rather than Sacred Marriage. Is she the eminent scholar on the topic at the moment? She suggests that there is no evidence that the sacred marriage actually took place from what little I could read. Was looking to clear this up a little, and point the above out to the other authors. Desdinova ( talk) 18:59, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
A Seventh Day Adventist website states one of the errors of other Christians includes "Saying that the birth of Jesus was on 25 December [from the birthday of the Babylonian sun god's son, Tammuz];" [1] Other sites have similar claims [2] [3] which I am not in a position to confirm. Is there enough solid research to include some of that information in the article? Samatva ( talk) 14:13, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
Ezekiel's vision obviously relates to the first temple (Salomon's) not the Second temple. There is an error in the legend to the picture. Qasinka ( talk) 19:56, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
{{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (
link)
{{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (
link)
{{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (
link)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Dumuzid article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Dumuzid has been listed as one of the
Philosophy and religion good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: February 20, 2018. ( Reviewed version). |
This
level-5 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I deleted the section with the above title as a clear copyright violation. It's quoted a number of places on the web and I can't locate the original source, but it appears in a post dated from 2006 here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/caner/314998602/ where it's attributed to one Michael Himick at http://www.artknowledgenews.com/?q=node/1412 which is a dead link. Since we don't know who this is we can't assume he's a reliable source or if the quote was even original to him, so we can't even use the information until it can be verified elsewhere. 192.31.106.36 ( talk) 05:53, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Dumuzid the Shepherd. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:14, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
I think that Tammuz (mythology) should be merged into this article because "Tammuz" is just a later Semitic spelling of "Dumuzid" and the two names refer to exactly the same figure. I would have just merged the two articles myself, but, unfortunately, I have discovered that people become really angry with me when I do that, so I am putting up this merge proposal. -- Katolophyromai ( talk) 21:34, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Iazyges ( talk · contribs) 03:57, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Will start soon. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 03:57, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
GA Criteria
|
---|
GA Criteria:
|
*The refs Burkert 1985 and Detienne 1972 have no corresponding citations.
*In Sumerian myth, Dumuzid's sister was Geshtinanna, suggest In Sumerian mythology, Dumuzid's sister was Geshtinanna,, unless there is only one myth in which she is mentioned, which seems unlikely.
*not usually be stored without spoiling. suggest not easily be stored without spoiling.
In "Myths from Mesopotamia: Creation, The Flood, Gilgamesh, and Others" Stephanie Dalley says that Dumuzi dies and resurrects but the article says he doesn't.
"The Sumerian version, The Descent of Inanna, is attested earlier, and is much longer, consisting of some 410 lines. It is a fuller, more detailed account, and shows clearly that Dumuzi periodically died and rose, causing seasonal fertility, a fact which had been doubted until 1963, when a newly published fragment disclosed the crucial evidence." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blebnh ( talk • contribs) 05:17, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
Somethings wrong with Kramer, 1966. I tried correcting the format from "article=" to "title=" but a template error keeps occurring: Warning: Dumuzid is calling Template:Citation with more than one value for the "title" parameter. Only the last value provided will be used. — JudeccaXIII ( talk) 17:52, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
The reference #29 listed currently shows a preview of the book Ishtar by Louise Pryke, however it links to a google search page with the term "Ninshubur gender" rather than Sacred Marriage. Is she the eminent scholar on the topic at the moment? She suggests that there is no evidence that the sacred marriage actually took place from what little I could read. Was looking to clear this up a little, and point the above out to the other authors. Desdinova ( talk) 18:59, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
A Seventh Day Adventist website states one of the errors of other Christians includes "Saying that the birth of Jesus was on 25 December [from the birthday of the Babylonian sun god's son, Tammuz];" [1] Other sites have similar claims [2] [3] which I am not in a position to confirm. Is there enough solid research to include some of that information in the article? Samatva ( talk) 14:13, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
Ezekiel's vision obviously relates to the first temple (Salomon's) not the Second temple. There is an error in the legend to the picture. Qasinka ( talk) 19:56, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
{{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (
link)
{{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (
link)
{{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (
link)