This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Vera otter. Peer reviewers: SICUwinki, Ofloofla.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 19:54, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Carmencee. Peer reviewers: Ninapatricof, Eliza476, EmoryStudentSuperstar.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 19:54, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
The Wikipedia page on Dee Rees was well done. The article written was insightful and gave a various amount of information on the film maker. Two strengths to the article includes the amount of information given, as well as the article was well written will little spelling and grammar mistakes. In one area to improve, would be to give more insight on the filmmakers early life and personal life.
- SICUwinki ( talk) 18:59, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
Hii Carmen! I'm reviewing your article. Here are some suggestions I have after reading it:
Overall, things are pretty good. It could just use a little bit of cleaning up (content-wise) and organizing :)
- EmoryStudentSuperstar ( talk) 06:26, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Vera otter. Peer reviewers: SICUwinki, Ofloofla.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 19:54, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Carmencee. Peer reviewers: Ninapatricof, Eliza476, EmoryStudentSuperstar.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 19:54, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
The Wikipedia page on Dee Rees was well done. The article written was insightful and gave a various amount of information on the film maker. Two strengths to the article includes the amount of information given, as well as the article was well written will little spelling and grammar mistakes. In one area to improve, would be to give more insight on the filmmakers early life and personal life.
- SICUwinki ( talk) 18:59, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
Hii Carmen! I'm reviewing your article. Here are some suggestions I have after reading it:
Overall, things are pretty good. It could just use a little bit of cleaning up (content-wise) and organizing :)
- EmoryStudentSuperstar ( talk) 06:26, 6 May 2018 (UTC)