This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was nominated for deletion on 11 December 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
The result of the move request was: Withdrawn. Will create disambiguation soon. (Never mind)
George Ho (
talk) 16:48, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
December 2014 North American winter storm → 2014 North American winter storm – Regardless of whether there are other storms, the storm in December 2014 in North America is the only notable winter storm of this year. "December" seems unnecessary, even when such removal might invite November details. George Ho ( talk) 08:50, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
I might argue that this name is still inappropriate. It occurred during winter, but the West Coast impacts cannot be classified as those of a "winter storm". What is and is not a winter storm depends on more than just being in winter. Perhaps December 2014 North American cyclone? Something along those lines? Dustin (talk) 21:19, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
One more thing: I think the point we all missed is that this system did make it to the East Coast. Beginning yesterday, this storm triggered lake-effect snow across large portions of the Great Lakes region, and before then, meterologists did state that the storm dropped around a foot of snow in parts of the Midwest. Although the alternative title "storm complex" is viable, this system had a notable wintry side throughout most of its existence in the US (in terms of duration). We can't rename this article just because this storm was mostly rain and wind in California; we also have to take into account its effects in the other states of the US. Given all of this, I believe that the article title should remain the way it is. LightandDark2000 ( talk) 02:45, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was nominated for deletion on 11 December 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
The result of the move request was: Withdrawn. Will create disambiguation soon. (Never mind)
George Ho (
talk) 16:48, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
December 2014 North American winter storm → 2014 North American winter storm – Regardless of whether there are other storms, the storm in December 2014 in North America is the only notable winter storm of this year. "December" seems unnecessary, even when such removal might invite November details. George Ho ( talk) 08:50, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
I might argue that this name is still inappropriate. It occurred during winter, but the West Coast impacts cannot be classified as those of a "winter storm". What is and is not a winter storm depends on more than just being in winter. Perhaps December 2014 North American cyclone? Something along those lines? Dustin (talk) 21:19, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
One more thing: I think the point we all missed is that this system did make it to the East Coast. Beginning yesterday, this storm triggered lake-effect snow across large portions of the Great Lakes region, and before then, meterologists did state that the storm dropped around a foot of snow in parts of the Midwest. Although the alternative title "storm complex" is viable, this system had a notable wintry side throughout most of its existence in the US (in terms of duration). We can't rename this article just because this storm was mostly rain and wind in California; we also have to take into account its effects in the other states of the US. Given all of this, I believe that the article title should remain the way it is. LightandDark2000 ( talk) 02:45, 18 December 2014 (UTC)