This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
This article needs a lot of work. I deleted something about his best paintings being of his garden because they had a lot of colors in them. Quantity does not equal quality. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.232.67.xxx ( talk) 18:31, 26 September 2001 (UTC)
If he saw everything reddish, he would see his painting reddish, so his painting would seem normal to people without cataracts. If this is a real case, it should be rephrased.
The ultraviolet thing seems slightly plausible though. He'd say UV colors and try to approximate them with his paints, but to healthy eyes, the UV component of the pigment is lost and we only see reddish.
According to the Sotheby's text on the Monet in my family's collection, Monet was in Holland in 1871 and not England. In fact he left France in September 1870, with the painter Daubigny, and arrived in Zaandam, Holland. I have not edited the above because it is not my own knowledge but you may make of it what you will that the painting of which I speak was painted in Zaandam in 1877. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.112.141.17 ( talk • contribs) 20 November 2006.
Does simply being the spouse of a notable person honestly make you notable?
I think the Alice Hoschedé article should be deleted or merged to the this article at a minimmum.
James084 20:41, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
From what I understood he lived in Japan for a while, didnt he?
Antonio Monet (and Manet's) Lover Martin 4 Feb. 2005
70.242.157.149 07:54, 4 August 2006 (UTC) Should we include anything about Masashi Kishimoto? He was a fan of Monet.
The proper term is 'grainstacks' not 'haystacks'. 216.91.240.14 17:12, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
This article is way too short to currently be listed as a good article. The third criteria at What Is a Good Article asks for breadth of coverage, which this article sorely lacks. Combine that with some minor sourcing issues, and it has a ways to go. My suggestion is to expand this quite a bit and get a peer review in. Good luck. -- badlydrawnjeff talk 01:28, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
How could he have developed a reputation for drawing caricatures if he was 1 year old? Munchikinka 11:21, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
I've reverted to the last version of the article (from April 11), prior to vandalism which had gone undetected, and which included deletion of headings and content. If in doing so I have deleted valuable content, please restore any such passages. JNW 02:00, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
I believe the term "impressionism" was coined pejoratively by a french critic, rather than deriving from "impression, sunrise." I could be mistaken. I'll return soon with the research
It was coined by a French critic who was critizing "Impression Sunrise." Eenyminy 03:23, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
I reverted an edit by a vandal, the text of which was "His mother died in 1857, when he was only 17." If this can be verified it should be restored. Hu 21:59, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
No it is right... his mother died when he was 16. See my revision. Source: Monet the Ultimate Impressionist (Sylvie Patin, Abrams Discoveries Series).
I don't know but I believe that the line in the biography that says "On 1 April 1885 Monet entered the Le Havre secondary school." may be wrong? It's the date I'm unsure about because 1885 would be much too late. I don't know the correct date so I can't change it myself.
My error (I think). The date should read: On 1 April 1851, per the Abrams reference above. Sorry about that.
I concur that he was the BEST ARTIST OF ALL TIME!! RIGHT ON!! Eenyminy 03:25, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
I think it's worth noting that Monet as a teenager drew charactictures of politicians and sold them. Also, he used his first wife Camille and one of his sons in some of his paintings. Eenyminy 03:20, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
His youthful caricatures and his paintings of Camille are mentioned in the article. JNW 03:31, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
I can't edit the page (locked) but I noticed a typo. I believe it should be "water lilies", rather than "waterlilies". 152.4.100.253 00:00, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
From the article: Between 1883 and 1908, Monet traveled to the Mediterranean, where he painted landmarks, landscapes, and seascapes, such as Bordighera. He painted an important series of paintings in Venice, Italy, and in London he painted two important series — views of Parliament and views of Charing Cross Bridge. His wife Alice died in 1911 and his oldest son Jean, who had married Alice's daughter Blanche, Monet's particular favourite, died in 1914.[4] After his wife died, Blanche looked after and cared for him. It was during this time that Monet began to develop the first signs of cataracts.</ref>
Reference now furnished. Thanks. JNW 02:04, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
The colour in this image is terrible. It needs to be subdued. Tyrenius ( talk) 22:36, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Policy (often not followed, I know) is at Wikipedia:Image_use_policy#Displayed_image_size. Images should be thumb (no need to put "right" as that's the default). Then user's preference settings (if modified) can adjust the size to suit. If size if specified, the preference settings don't work - try it and see. Maybe some discussion is needed here. Tyrenius ( talk) 03:17, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
This is his most expensive painting sold: Monet's " Le Pont du chemin de fer a Argenteuil," an 1873 painting of a railway bridge spanning the Seine near Paris was bought by an anonymous telephone bidder for a record $ 41.4 million at Christie's auction in New York on May 6, 2008. The previous record for his painting stood at $ 36.5 million. Afp.google.com, Monet fetches record price at New York auction [2] -- Florentino floro ( talk) 06:59, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
He is cited as having eidetic memory.
Not necessarily. He studied the science of the eye and of sight, believing in the persistence of memory. When he was painting his series of the cathedral at Rouen (spelling?), he painted shadows as they appeared in his retina. This isn't necessarily eidetic memory. Interesting comment by Joachim Pissarro in the documentary film Monet's Palate attributed Impressionism by Monet not to his eyesite but how much wine he drank —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
24.12.140.213 (
talk) 07:14, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
In the biography is written that Monet met Joseph Mallord William Turner and John Constable in London. This looks quiet impossible to me, since Turner died in 1851, Constable died in 1837 and Monet went to London in 1870. Lebuin ( talk) 16:52, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
I took the liberty of changing the title given under the painting
to the original title in French
with its translation in English
The French word *douanier* meaning *customs officer* and the word *Hütte* in German meaning *cottage*, I cannot figure out how whoever did the translation from French to German to English arrived at *Hut of the Douaniers with Varengeville*.
Put title either in French or in English, but no bastard translation from German!
Cordialement, Frania W. ( talk) 13:55, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
We need more about the influence of Katsushika Hokusai and its relation to Monet's work and impressionism in general. Viriditas ( talk) 11:53, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
The external links on this page do not refer to the Museum Monet's Home and Gardens Fondation Claude Monet where they should instead they point to commercial sites —Preceding unsigned comment added by Givgry ( talk • contribs) 21:17, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
number 12 is shut down —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
115.70.62.38 (
talk) 05:30, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
Monet's birth name is Oscar-Claude Monet, not Claude-Oscar. His parents called him Oscar, that's well-known and all his first works are signed up O. Monet. He changed for his second name probably because it sounds better for an artist and / or to remember his father, who had also Claude as second name. Nortmannus ( talk) 22:50, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
I've started an approach that may apply to Wikipedia's Core Biography articles: creating a branching list page based on in popular culture information. I started that last year while I raised Joan of Arc to featured article when I created Cultural depictions of Joan of Arc, which has become a featured list. Recently I also created Cultural depictions of Alexander the Great out of material that had been deleted from the biography article. Since cultural references sometimes get deleted without discussion, I'd like to suggest this as a model for the editors here. Regards, Durova 15:20, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
The format is both chronological and informative, please add content and discuss proposed changes here, achieving consensus first... Modernist ( talk) 01:29, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Someone changed "Monet" to "Bonnet" in addition the external links for Monet should go to Fondation Claude Monet not Givery.org which is a business —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gamernotnerd ( talk • contribs) 20:22, 18 March 2008 (UTC) somebody included a picture of a nude man in the bottom of the page, check that out and remove it please.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.4.48.130 ( talk) 06:22, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
The awkward sentence " After her husband (Ernest Hoschedé) became bankrupt, and left in 1878 for Belgium, and after the death of Camille Monet in September 1879, and while Monet continued to live in the house in Vétheuil; Alice Hoschedé helped Monet to raise his two sons, Jean and Michel, by taking them to Paris to live alongside her own six children." should be broken into smaller sentences. I suggest replacing it by the following:
Ernest Hoschedé became bankrupt and left for Belgium in 1878. Camille Monet died in September 1879. Monet continued to live in the the house in Vétheuil. Ernest's wife, Alice Hoschedé, took Monet's sons, Jean and Michael, to live in Paris alongside her own six children.
I see no reason for enumerating Alice's six children in the main body of the article. That can be done in a footnote.
Tashiro ( talk) 16:58, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
"Monet was in Paris for several years and met other young painters who would become friends and fellow impressionists; among them was Édouard Manet." The text before this has already been noted in need for a citation. Is this reffering to his life in Paris before he joined the war in 1861? From all the other sources I've read through (i have no citation for this), he did not properly meet any of the Impressionst artists till he started at Gleyre's art school, especially Manet whom he did not meet till after Monets work enter the Salon and was mistaken for Manets. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yaire ( talk • contribs) 18:11, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
Although he's one of the most famous painters, the use of more than 40 images of his work in the article appears to be excessive. I believe these should be pruned to show no more than 5 per gallery (there are currently two), and perhaps 2 more as 'loose images'. Those images selected ought to be highly representative and highly notable pieces. I have therefore cut back on the number of images used. -- Ohconfucius ¡digame! 08:54, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
o Romanticism, and other avant-garde art movements but has no relevance to this discussion... Modernist ( talk) 05:29, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
Just watched a TV programme on the battle to try and get a Monet authenticated by the Wildenstein Institute and came here to find out more but cannot see anything mention of the Wildenstein Institute which seems surprising considering the power they have especially in case like this one where the painting has been attributed to Monet by just about every expert and scientific evidence. jmb ( talk) 19:14, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
As founder and board member of the foundation "Stichting Monet in Zaandam" I'd appreciate if our website www.monetinzaandam.nl could be added to the article on Wikipedia. Recently our foundation published a book in 4 languages (Dutch, English, French, German) about the 4 months Claude Monet stayed in Zaandam, listing the 25 paintings he made, and with a map of the locations, allowing the reader to visit all locations (walking or per bycicle) where Monet painted.
81.68.152.132 (
talk) 21:06, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
An image used in this article,
File:ClaudeMonet.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 11:05, 19 October 2011 (UTC) |
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add the following to the list of External Links Monet Gallery Monet’s biography and paintings AuctoriCMS ( talk) 19:00, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Monet is the oldest son of his parents. [1]
Please change He was the second son of Claude Adolphe Monet and Louise Justine Aubrée Monet to He was the Oldest son of Claude Adolphe Monet and Louise Justine Aubrée Monet. This is directly under Early Life heading.
-- Bens545 ( talk) 15:21, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
From the later life section, it reads as though people with cataracts paint things redder? i know that's not the intent, but that entire section could use a little work/clarification. L.cash.m ( talk) 22:02, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Would it be possible for this painting to be credited under the image with its current location which is the Columbus Museum of Art in Columbus, OH? Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by ColumbusMuseum ( talk • contribs) 15:46, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
Monet was one of the greatest painters of the 19th and 20th century. These paintings should be seen... Modernist ( talk) 00:27, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Yesterday I removed many of the pics from the galleries as being superfluous to a biography. User:Coldcreation reverted this with the comment that they had been deleted without explanation. In fact, there were two edit summaries, and two minor adjustments to formatting (unexplained) because a valuable image had been lost in the process.
Galleries are desirable in articles on artists. However, articles are biographies, not catalogues of the artist's work. Wikimedia Commons is the repostory of hundreds of images, mostly carefully arranged in categories and accessible at the hit of a button at the bottom of the artist's Wikipedia article.
The images that are placed into the article serve to show the chronology of an artist's work, there range of subjects and their style, which may change considerably over the decades of their life. It does not take 75 images in order to achieve this. Why not?
Good choosing
The message is: Look and choose. Don't include any image without a rationale. Amandajm ( talk) 00:56, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Meanwhile, I suggest that you restore my changes. I don't want to get into an edit war, but "Monet was a famous painter" simply isn't a good enough reason for having a mish-mash of images jammed together without though or rationale.
And another grouping:
There is a huge difference between mass-deletions and rearranging images. While the latter seems meaningful, the former shows a complete lack of regard for the power of image over text. Paintings need to be seen, displayed, exhibited in Wikipedia articles, not just stored, classified or catalogued in a repository. Coldcreation ( talk) 06:03, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
This reads as if it has been lifted from somewhere else.
':And yet to this—the consequence of his own painting—Monet was apparently blind. Another really POV statement.
Amandajm ( talk) 09:35, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
I just discovered this article. It could have a long row of pictures that are date-matched to the text.
Amandajm ( talk) 13:02, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Nonsense! The gallery sections are exceedingly meaningful. Coldcreation ( talk) 23:09, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
The burden of posting correct sourced information is on the user making the addition. If there are mistakes, inaccurate, or unsourced information added (or removed), don't be surprised if other users knowledgeable enough to notice such errors or omissions revert the edit back to a prior version. Sometimes a revert is the best response to a bad edit. Coldcreation ( talk) 11:22, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
Over the past day or so several images have been removed from this article, and several have been added to the article. Some images recently added (by Modernist and Coldcreation) had been previously removed without regard for their importance in the history of art, others are new to this article. Images are crucial for the understanding of works of art, and for the complex œuvre of Claude Monet (with its differing series) many images are necessary. Coldcreation ( talk) 08:02, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
Modernist and Coldcreation: as per the WP:RFC instructions, I left a neutral message on the talk pages of WikiProjects this article belongs to. It would be impossible for you to disagree with the neutrality of the wording. It points to the discussion here. Why are you trying to scare contributors off by spamming your own messages to those talk pages, when the appropriate place to discuss it is here? Curly Turkey ( gobble) 20:38, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
Bottom line: Diffs, or you're lying. Curly Turkey ( gobble) 01:42, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
You cannot create an encyclopedia by simply lifting factual statements from another source, even if you reference the source. What I have removed here is not an appropriate inclusion:
You have no reason or justification for using the exact words of the source in order to say that Monet had ponds dug and planted a garden of waterlilies. And you do not need a direct quote to say that he painted them. The only part of this that should be quoted directly is the description of what he achieved, because this is opinion, (not a simply statement of fact which you should put into your own encyclopedic language), a "somewhat audacious style of painting in which the water-lily pond became the point of departure for an almost abstract art."
Actually "somewhat audacious" sounds somewhat inadequate. Never mind! Just plain "audacious" would be enough. Amandajm ( talk) 11:43, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
By the mid-1910s, Monet had achieved a completely new, fluid, and somewhat audacious style of painting in which the water-lily pond became the point of departure for an almost abstract art. (This is from The Metropolitan Museum website) This would need to be in quotes since it is the exact text from the website.
Monet had achieved, according to Gary Tinterow (Museum of Fine Arts, Houston), a completely new, fluid, and audacious style of painting by the mid-1910s in which the water lily pond became the starting point for an essentially abstract form of art. (This is in the Monet article, attributed to the author of the text with an inline citation and the original source linked: Gary Tinterow, Modern Europe, Metropolitan Museum of Art (New York, N.Y.), Jan 1, 1987). You claim of plagiarism is laughable. But if you would like to put some text in quote go ahead (just make sure it's his exact text). Coldcreation ( talk) 23:29, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
Preferred placement 1.
Placement 2.
Reasons: (please state them)
Preferred placement 1.
Placement 2
Placement 3.
Do we need two images?
Options
NOTE: In an article on Monet's "dejeuner sur l'herbe", both would have relevance.
How many images do we need that are of dark red/green/brown coloration? Similarly how many intensely green willow paintings do we need.
Options
Does every series need to be represented in the context of Monet's biography, or will some representative examples of several series surfice?
Options
Does the article require six examples in order to demonstrate what Monet was doing? [18]
Options:
Amandajm ( talk) 01:31, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
It still hasn't been put into quotation marks. Amandajm ( talk) 09:47, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Claude Monet/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Rated Start. Strong on his life, practically nothing on his painting. Things to do:
|
Last edited at 12:47, 28 September 2006 (UTC). Substituted at 20:25, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
This article needs a lot of work. I deleted something about his best paintings being of his garden because they had a lot of colors in them. Quantity does not equal quality. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.232.67.xxx ( talk) 18:31, 26 September 2001 (UTC)
If he saw everything reddish, he would see his painting reddish, so his painting would seem normal to people without cataracts. If this is a real case, it should be rephrased.
The ultraviolet thing seems slightly plausible though. He'd say UV colors and try to approximate them with his paints, but to healthy eyes, the UV component of the pigment is lost and we only see reddish.
According to the Sotheby's text on the Monet in my family's collection, Monet was in Holland in 1871 and not England. In fact he left France in September 1870, with the painter Daubigny, and arrived in Zaandam, Holland. I have not edited the above because it is not my own knowledge but you may make of it what you will that the painting of which I speak was painted in Zaandam in 1877. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.112.141.17 ( talk • contribs) 20 November 2006.
Does simply being the spouse of a notable person honestly make you notable?
I think the Alice Hoschedé article should be deleted or merged to the this article at a minimmum.
James084 20:41, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
From what I understood he lived in Japan for a while, didnt he?
Antonio Monet (and Manet's) Lover Martin 4 Feb. 2005
70.242.157.149 07:54, 4 August 2006 (UTC) Should we include anything about Masashi Kishimoto? He was a fan of Monet.
The proper term is 'grainstacks' not 'haystacks'. 216.91.240.14 17:12, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
This article is way too short to currently be listed as a good article. The third criteria at What Is a Good Article asks for breadth of coverage, which this article sorely lacks. Combine that with some minor sourcing issues, and it has a ways to go. My suggestion is to expand this quite a bit and get a peer review in. Good luck. -- badlydrawnjeff talk 01:28, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
How could he have developed a reputation for drawing caricatures if he was 1 year old? Munchikinka 11:21, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
I've reverted to the last version of the article (from April 11), prior to vandalism which had gone undetected, and which included deletion of headings and content. If in doing so I have deleted valuable content, please restore any such passages. JNW 02:00, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
I believe the term "impressionism" was coined pejoratively by a french critic, rather than deriving from "impression, sunrise." I could be mistaken. I'll return soon with the research
It was coined by a French critic who was critizing "Impression Sunrise." Eenyminy 03:23, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
I reverted an edit by a vandal, the text of which was "His mother died in 1857, when he was only 17." If this can be verified it should be restored. Hu 21:59, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
No it is right... his mother died when he was 16. See my revision. Source: Monet the Ultimate Impressionist (Sylvie Patin, Abrams Discoveries Series).
I don't know but I believe that the line in the biography that says "On 1 April 1885 Monet entered the Le Havre secondary school." may be wrong? It's the date I'm unsure about because 1885 would be much too late. I don't know the correct date so I can't change it myself.
My error (I think). The date should read: On 1 April 1851, per the Abrams reference above. Sorry about that.
I concur that he was the BEST ARTIST OF ALL TIME!! RIGHT ON!! Eenyminy 03:25, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
I think it's worth noting that Monet as a teenager drew charactictures of politicians and sold them. Also, he used his first wife Camille and one of his sons in some of his paintings. Eenyminy 03:20, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
His youthful caricatures and his paintings of Camille are mentioned in the article. JNW 03:31, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
I can't edit the page (locked) but I noticed a typo. I believe it should be "water lilies", rather than "waterlilies". 152.4.100.253 00:00, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
From the article: Between 1883 and 1908, Monet traveled to the Mediterranean, where he painted landmarks, landscapes, and seascapes, such as Bordighera. He painted an important series of paintings in Venice, Italy, and in London he painted two important series — views of Parliament and views of Charing Cross Bridge. His wife Alice died in 1911 and his oldest son Jean, who had married Alice's daughter Blanche, Monet's particular favourite, died in 1914.[4] After his wife died, Blanche looked after and cared for him. It was during this time that Monet began to develop the first signs of cataracts.</ref>
Reference now furnished. Thanks. JNW 02:04, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
The colour in this image is terrible. It needs to be subdued. Tyrenius ( talk) 22:36, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Policy (often not followed, I know) is at Wikipedia:Image_use_policy#Displayed_image_size. Images should be thumb (no need to put "right" as that's the default). Then user's preference settings (if modified) can adjust the size to suit. If size if specified, the preference settings don't work - try it and see. Maybe some discussion is needed here. Tyrenius ( talk) 03:17, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
This is his most expensive painting sold: Monet's " Le Pont du chemin de fer a Argenteuil," an 1873 painting of a railway bridge spanning the Seine near Paris was bought by an anonymous telephone bidder for a record $ 41.4 million at Christie's auction in New York on May 6, 2008. The previous record for his painting stood at $ 36.5 million. Afp.google.com, Monet fetches record price at New York auction [2] -- Florentino floro ( talk) 06:59, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
He is cited as having eidetic memory.
Not necessarily. He studied the science of the eye and of sight, believing in the persistence of memory. When he was painting his series of the cathedral at Rouen (spelling?), he painted shadows as they appeared in his retina. This isn't necessarily eidetic memory. Interesting comment by Joachim Pissarro in the documentary film Monet's Palate attributed Impressionism by Monet not to his eyesite but how much wine he drank —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
24.12.140.213 (
talk) 07:14, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
In the biography is written that Monet met Joseph Mallord William Turner and John Constable in London. This looks quiet impossible to me, since Turner died in 1851, Constable died in 1837 and Monet went to London in 1870. Lebuin ( talk) 16:52, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
I took the liberty of changing the title given under the painting
to the original title in French
with its translation in English
The French word *douanier* meaning *customs officer* and the word *Hütte* in German meaning *cottage*, I cannot figure out how whoever did the translation from French to German to English arrived at *Hut of the Douaniers with Varengeville*.
Put title either in French or in English, but no bastard translation from German!
Cordialement, Frania W. ( talk) 13:55, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
We need more about the influence of Katsushika Hokusai and its relation to Monet's work and impressionism in general. Viriditas ( talk) 11:53, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
The external links on this page do not refer to the Museum Monet's Home and Gardens Fondation Claude Monet where they should instead they point to commercial sites —Preceding unsigned comment added by Givgry ( talk • contribs) 21:17, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
number 12 is shut down —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
115.70.62.38 (
talk) 05:30, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
Monet's birth name is Oscar-Claude Monet, not Claude-Oscar. His parents called him Oscar, that's well-known and all his first works are signed up O. Monet. He changed for his second name probably because it sounds better for an artist and / or to remember his father, who had also Claude as second name. Nortmannus ( talk) 22:50, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
I've started an approach that may apply to Wikipedia's Core Biography articles: creating a branching list page based on in popular culture information. I started that last year while I raised Joan of Arc to featured article when I created Cultural depictions of Joan of Arc, which has become a featured list. Recently I also created Cultural depictions of Alexander the Great out of material that had been deleted from the biography article. Since cultural references sometimes get deleted without discussion, I'd like to suggest this as a model for the editors here. Regards, Durova 15:20, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
The format is both chronological and informative, please add content and discuss proposed changes here, achieving consensus first... Modernist ( talk) 01:29, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Someone changed "Monet" to "Bonnet" in addition the external links for Monet should go to Fondation Claude Monet not Givery.org which is a business —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gamernotnerd ( talk • contribs) 20:22, 18 March 2008 (UTC) somebody included a picture of a nude man in the bottom of the page, check that out and remove it please.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.4.48.130 ( talk) 06:22, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
The awkward sentence " After her husband (Ernest Hoschedé) became bankrupt, and left in 1878 for Belgium, and after the death of Camille Monet in September 1879, and while Monet continued to live in the house in Vétheuil; Alice Hoschedé helped Monet to raise his two sons, Jean and Michel, by taking them to Paris to live alongside her own six children." should be broken into smaller sentences. I suggest replacing it by the following:
Ernest Hoschedé became bankrupt and left for Belgium in 1878. Camille Monet died in September 1879. Monet continued to live in the the house in Vétheuil. Ernest's wife, Alice Hoschedé, took Monet's sons, Jean and Michael, to live in Paris alongside her own six children.
I see no reason for enumerating Alice's six children in the main body of the article. That can be done in a footnote.
Tashiro ( talk) 16:58, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
"Monet was in Paris for several years and met other young painters who would become friends and fellow impressionists; among them was Édouard Manet." The text before this has already been noted in need for a citation. Is this reffering to his life in Paris before he joined the war in 1861? From all the other sources I've read through (i have no citation for this), he did not properly meet any of the Impressionst artists till he started at Gleyre's art school, especially Manet whom he did not meet till after Monets work enter the Salon and was mistaken for Manets. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yaire ( talk • contribs) 18:11, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
Although he's one of the most famous painters, the use of more than 40 images of his work in the article appears to be excessive. I believe these should be pruned to show no more than 5 per gallery (there are currently two), and perhaps 2 more as 'loose images'. Those images selected ought to be highly representative and highly notable pieces. I have therefore cut back on the number of images used. -- Ohconfucius ¡digame! 08:54, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
o Romanticism, and other avant-garde art movements but has no relevance to this discussion... Modernist ( talk) 05:29, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
Just watched a TV programme on the battle to try and get a Monet authenticated by the Wildenstein Institute and came here to find out more but cannot see anything mention of the Wildenstein Institute which seems surprising considering the power they have especially in case like this one where the painting has been attributed to Monet by just about every expert and scientific evidence. jmb ( talk) 19:14, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
As founder and board member of the foundation "Stichting Monet in Zaandam" I'd appreciate if our website www.monetinzaandam.nl could be added to the article on Wikipedia. Recently our foundation published a book in 4 languages (Dutch, English, French, German) about the 4 months Claude Monet stayed in Zaandam, listing the 25 paintings he made, and with a map of the locations, allowing the reader to visit all locations (walking or per bycicle) where Monet painted.
81.68.152.132 (
talk) 21:06, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
An image used in this article,
File:ClaudeMonet.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 11:05, 19 October 2011 (UTC) |
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add the following to the list of External Links Monet Gallery Monet’s biography and paintings AuctoriCMS ( talk) 19:00, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Monet is the oldest son of his parents. [1]
Please change He was the second son of Claude Adolphe Monet and Louise Justine Aubrée Monet to He was the Oldest son of Claude Adolphe Monet and Louise Justine Aubrée Monet. This is directly under Early Life heading.
-- Bens545 ( talk) 15:21, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
From the later life section, it reads as though people with cataracts paint things redder? i know that's not the intent, but that entire section could use a little work/clarification. L.cash.m ( talk) 22:02, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Would it be possible for this painting to be credited under the image with its current location which is the Columbus Museum of Art in Columbus, OH? Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by ColumbusMuseum ( talk • contribs) 15:46, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
Monet was one of the greatest painters of the 19th and 20th century. These paintings should be seen... Modernist ( talk) 00:27, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Yesterday I removed many of the pics from the galleries as being superfluous to a biography. User:Coldcreation reverted this with the comment that they had been deleted without explanation. In fact, there were two edit summaries, and two minor adjustments to formatting (unexplained) because a valuable image had been lost in the process.
Galleries are desirable in articles on artists. However, articles are biographies, not catalogues of the artist's work. Wikimedia Commons is the repostory of hundreds of images, mostly carefully arranged in categories and accessible at the hit of a button at the bottom of the artist's Wikipedia article.
The images that are placed into the article serve to show the chronology of an artist's work, there range of subjects and their style, which may change considerably over the decades of their life. It does not take 75 images in order to achieve this. Why not?
Good choosing
The message is: Look and choose. Don't include any image without a rationale. Amandajm ( talk) 00:56, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Meanwhile, I suggest that you restore my changes. I don't want to get into an edit war, but "Monet was a famous painter" simply isn't a good enough reason for having a mish-mash of images jammed together without though or rationale.
And another grouping:
There is a huge difference between mass-deletions and rearranging images. While the latter seems meaningful, the former shows a complete lack of regard for the power of image over text. Paintings need to be seen, displayed, exhibited in Wikipedia articles, not just stored, classified or catalogued in a repository. Coldcreation ( talk) 06:03, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
This reads as if it has been lifted from somewhere else.
':And yet to this—the consequence of his own painting—Monet was apparently blind. Another really POV statement.
Amandajm ( talk) 09:35, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
I just discovered this article. It could have a long row of pictures that are date-matched to the text.
Amandajm ( talk) 13:02, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Nonsense! The gallery sections are exceedingly meaningful. Coldcreation ( talk) 23:09, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
The burden of posting correct sourced information is on the user making the addition. If there are mistakes, inaccurate, or unsourced information added (or removed), don't be surprised if other users knowledgeable enough to notice such errors or omissions revert the edit back to a prior version. Sometimes a revert is the best response to a bad edit. Coldcreation ( talk) 11:22, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
Over the past day or so several images have been removed from this article, and several have been added to the article. Some images recently added (by Modernist and Coldcreation) had been previously removed without regard for their importance in the history of art, others are new to this article. Images are crucial for the understanding of works of art, and for the complex œuvre of Claude Monet (with its differing series) many images are necessary. Coldcreation ( talk) 08:02, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
Modernist and Coldcreation: as per the WP:RFC instructions, I left a neutral message on the talk pages of WikiProjects this article belongs to. It would be impossible for you to disagree with the neutrality of the wording. It points to the discussion here. Why are you trying to scare contributors off by spamming your own messages to those talk pages, when the appropriate place to discuss it is here? Curly Turkey ( gobble) 20:38, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
Bottom line: Diffs, or you're lying. Curly Turkey ( gobble) 01:42, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
You cannot create an encyclopedia by simply lifting factual statements from another source, even if you reference the source. What I have removed here is not an appropriate inclusion:
You have no reason or justification for using the exact words of the source in order to say that Monet had ponds dug and planted a garden of waterlilies. And you do not need a direct quote to say that he painted them. The only part of this that should be quoted directly is the description of what he achieved, because this is opinion, (not a simply statement of fact which you should put into your own encyclopedic language), a "somewhat audacious style of painting in which the water-lily pond became the point of departure for an almost abstract art."
Actually "somewhat audacious" sounds somewhat inadequate. Never mind! Just plain "audacious" would be enough. Amandajm ( talk) 11:43, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
By the mid-1910s, Monet had achieved a completely new, fluid, and somewhat audacious style of painting in which the water-lily pond became the point of departure for an almost abstract art. (This is from The Metropolitan Museum website) This would need to be in quotes since it is the exact text from the website.
Monet had achieved, according to Gary Tinterow (Museum of Fine Arts, Houston), a completely new, fluid, and audacious style of painting by the mid-1910s in which the water lily pond became the starting point for an essentially abstract form of art. (This is in the Monet article, attributed to the author of the text with an inline citation and the original source linked: Gary Tinterow, Modern Europe, Metropolitan Museum of Art (New York, N.Y.), Jan 1, 1987). You claim of plagiarism is laughable. But if you would like to put some text in quote go ahead (just make sure it's his exact text). Coldcreation ( talk) 23:29, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
Preferred placement 1.
Placement 2.
Reasons: (please state them)
Preferred placement 1.
Placement 2
Placement 3.
Do we need two images?
Options
NOTE: In an article on Monet's "dejeuner sur l'herbe", both would have relevance.
How many images do we need that are of dark red/green/brown coloration? Similarly how many intensely green willow paintings do we need.
Options
Does every series need to be represented in the context of Monet's biography, or will some representative examples of several series surfice?
Options
Does the article require six examples in order to demonstrate what Monet was doing? [18]
Options:
Amandajm ( talk) 01:31, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
It still hasn't been put into quotation marks. Amandajm ( talk) 09:47, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Claude Monet/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Rated Start. Strong on his life, practically nothing on his painting. Things to do:
|
Last edited at 12:47, 28 September 2006 (UTC). Substituted at 20:25, 3 May 2016 (UTC)