This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Archives: 1 |
|
The
Wikimedia Foundation's
Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
I added the {{ advert}} template the other day, the first line of which says, "This article contains content that is written like an advertisement." User:Sampol327 removed the template without making any changes to the article, stating in the edit summary, "Removed advert template as this issue appears to be resolved." This edit summary appears despite no changes having been made to the article itself since the time I added the template. Here's the problem with this article: 5-10 sentences in it sound like advertising copy and/or contain Wikipedia:Weasel words. One example is the article's third sentence, which says, "His family foundation, Tusk Philanthropies, is leading the effort to bring mobile voting to the United States." The problem with this sentence is the phrase "leading the effort". That phraseology is intended to cast a positive glow. It's not an encyclopedic way of writing. It also is not substantiated by the linked source. And, even if it were substantiated by the linked source, we would normally want multiple reliable sources to establish the notability of a claim like that. Instead of adding the template, I could just whip through the article and remove all the (5-10) sentences that are like that. Novellasyes ( talk) 18:43, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Nothing proven, but see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mbc16 for some background on this. Whilst there probably won't be any action taken on sockpuppetry since it wasn't always overlapping or currently ongoing, the admin did opine that it was likely that User:Mbc16, User:Sampol327, User:Bb510c1 and User:Pvt928c were the same person. Mako001 ( talk) 00:51, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
Anybody know what exactly the title "deputy governor" means in Illinois? I searched and couldn't really find anything official or authoritative to even prove that the office exists. Is it merely honorific? While there are plenty of sources backing up Tusk's position as "deputy governor," it certainly is not the same as the Lieutenant Governor of Illinois. Any help here would be appreciated. - Headphase ( talk) 03:26, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
I have a few proposed additions to make in this article. I used the "edit COI" template due to my employment with Bradley Tusk.
References
If there are any questions, please feel free to message me. BasilAtTusk ( talk) 23:31, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
References
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. The requested changes were not specific enough. |
Hi, Basil at Tusk here again with a few more proposed additions to make in this article. I used the "edit COI" template due to my employment with Bradley Tusk.
The proposed edits I have are in the current "Private sector" section. These changes include things like:
Here is the draft:
Private sector
After serving as Deputy Governor of Illinois, Tusk was hired as a senior vice president at
Lehman Brothers, where he created the lottery monetization group and headed all of its efforts regarding U.S. based lotteries.
[4] Combining his backgrounds in finance and politics, Tusk developed a successful framework to help states monetize their lotteries.
[5]
In 2015, Tusk ran a public affairs campaign for Uber that included television, radio, and digital ads as well as direct mail and grassroots organizing in opposition to a cap on rideshare vehicles proposed by New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio. [6] The campaign argued that "the company was good for the city, providing jobs and transportation for less affluent residents in the outer boroughs." [7] The bill was dropped before it reached a vote. [8] After the campaign's success in New York City, Tusk moved onto other places like Boston, Philadelphia, Chicago, Miami, Los Angeles, Denver and Washington D.C. [9] For his representation of Uber, Tusk was compensated with equity in the company estimated to be worth $100 million. [10] The experience also provided him with exposure to the world of venture capital, [11] and Tusk Ventures was launched two weeks after the New York City victory. [12]
He formed IG Acquisition Corp, [13] [14] a SPAC planning to acquire a business in the leisure, gaming and hospitality industries. [15]
Tusk Strategies
In 2011 Tusk founded Tusk Strategies, which is the first firm dedicated to helping startups navigate political issues and is based in New York City.
[16] The firm develops and runs campaigns for companies, including
Google,
Walmart,
AT&T,
Pepsi,
FanDuel,
[17] and institutions including
Stanford University, the
Rockefeller Foundation and
Texas A&M, and individuals including
Michael Bloomberg and
George Lucas.
[18]
Tusk Strategies also conducts issue advocacy campaigns around education reform and government; campaigns to help political candidates, non-profits and trade associations. [19]
Tusk Ventures
In 2015, Tusk launched Tusk Ventures Partners, a venture capital fund that invests in startups facing political and regulatory challenges or pursuing political and governmental opportunities. His work with startups began in 2011, when he worked with transportation startup
Uber, which was contesting with regulation proposed by the
Taxi and Limousine Commission (CE) of New York City.
[20]
Tusk Ventures has worked with over three dozen startups including Bird, FanDuel, Lemonade, Handy, Eaze, Nexar, Ripple, MainStreet, Nurx, Ro, Kodiak Robotics, and Care/Of, solving a variety of political, regulatory and media challenges solely in return for equity in each company and for investment rights in each company's next round of financing. [21] [22]
Tusk Venture Partners raised its first fund in 2016 and began deploying capital into startups including Lemonade, [23] Nexar, Care/Of, Circle, Coinbase, Bird, Ro and FanDuel. [24] [25]
References
{{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (
link)
{{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (
link)
If there are any questions, please feel free to message me. BasilAtTusk ( talk) 18:29, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Sample edit request
|
---|
|
Regards,
Spintendo 23:52, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
References
Instructions for Submitters: Describe the requested changes in detail. This includes the exact proposed wording of the new material, the exact proposed location for it, and an explicit description of any wording to be removed, including removal for any substitution.
Instructions for Submitters: If the rationale for a change is not obvious (particularly for proposed deletions), explain.
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Thanks Spintendo for the suggestions. Here is my modified request:
References
{{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (
link)
I am happy to answer any questions. Thanks BasilAtTusk ( talk) 16:50, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Edit request partially implemented
"a SPAC planning to acquire a business in the leisure, gaming and hospitality industries". Wikipedia does not usually speak about the future plans of subjects in their articles.
Regards, Spintendo 00:16, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
@ Spintendo: let me clarify as I may have misspoken previously. The info about IG Acquisition Corp is included in the introduction, but is not in the body of the article. The current sentence in the intro is exactly as I had proposed, "He is also the chairman of IG Acquisition Corp, [1] [2] a SPAC planning to acquire a business in the leisure, gaming and hospitality industries. [3]"
I originally proposed adding the sentence to Private sector because I thought the intro was supposed to be a summary of content found in the article. With that said, I think you're right. IG Acquisition Corp has ended and the sentence does include "future plans", so I'm now wondering if it's best to simply remove that sentence from the article's introduction. If you and others decide IG Acquisition Corp does belong in the article, it would be best to move it from the intro to the Private sector section. BasilAtTusk ( talk) 22:04, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
References
{{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (
link)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Hello, in my continuing effort to make this page better for all, I wanted to ask if editors would consider removing the red links to "Nexar", "GlamSquad", and "MainStreet" under the "Tusk Ventures" subsection. Since articles for Nexar and MainStreet have been deleted, and it's not clear if GlamSquad is yet notable for a Wikipedia article, those red links can be removed per Wikipedia:Red link.
Please let me know if there are any questions, BasilAtTusk ( talk) 20:36, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Hi all, it's Basil for Bradley Tusk here again.
I noticed the article has some information that should be included in the Infobox too, specifically Tusk's alma mater. Would edits be willing to add in this information per the Infobox person template?
My specific request is that editors add to the infobox his alma maters University of Pennsylvania [1] [2] and University of Chicago Law School [3] [2]. Two of the sources I included here are already cited in the body of the article to verify this information and I have additionally added the WSJ source, which also verifies it.
Let me know if there are any questions.
References
Tusk...is widely credited with spearheading the administration's most notable successes, such as broadly expanding medical insurance for children, and for effectively overseeing a massive proportion of the state's operations, including its $60 billion budget and its 57,000-person workforce.
Thanks BasilAtTusk ( talk) 20:23, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
Lewcm Talk to me! 23:16, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. Reasons why were not provided. |
Thanks very much Lewcm for making those Infobox updates! I have another suggestion, this time to the Illinois subsection:
This adds needed context to the situation that is covered in the reference cited in the article. Happy to review any questions you have! BasilAtTusk ( talk) 15:55, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
This change of phrasing (which has not been given a reason) obviously benefits the subject while not substantively changing the meaning. Without a bonafide reason why for the change, it cannot be made. [1]
References
Instructions for Submitters: If the rationale for a change is not obvious (particularly for proposed deletions), explain.
Regards, Spintendo 16:40, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. |
Thanks for the consideration BasilAtTusk ( talk) 18:28, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Part of an edit requested by an editor with a conflict of interest has been implemented. |
Hello editors, I wanted to propose some updates to the current Tusk Philanthropies section. This includes:
References
Please let me know if there are any questions. Thanks BasilAtTusk ( talk) 15:22, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
The services Tusk has backed so far are for development of internet-based voting.
Hope this is alright, if you have any other suggestions for this bit please let me know :) Thanks, Encoded Talk to me! 15:44, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Hello editors. I previously made a suggestion for this page which was denied by STEMinfo due to it being too "crystal ball"-y since the book I was suggesting be added was not yet published. Good news, the book has now been published! Since this no longer is a crystal ball scenario, I would like to re-request this addition:
References
His second book, Obvious in Hindsight, which was released to a handful of independent bookstores this week and will be more broadly available later this month
I'm happy to answer any questions. Thanks BasilAtTusk ( talk) 15:42, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
The user below has a request that an edit be made to
Bradley Tusk. That user has an
actual or apparent
conflict of interest. The requested edits backlog is high. Please be very patient. There are currently 168 requests waiting for review. Please read the instructions for the parameters used by this template for accepting and declining them, and review the request below and make the edit if it is well sourced, neutral, and follows other Wikipedia guidelines and policies. |
Hello editors, I have some proposed updates to the New York Subsection:
References
Thanks for the review BasilAtTusk ( talk) 15:40, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The user below has a request that an edit be made to
Bradley Tusk. That user has an
actual or apparent
conflict of interest. The requested edits backlog is high. Please be very patient. There are currently 168 requests waiting for review. Please read the instructions for the parameters used by this template for accepting and declining them, and review the request below and make the edit if it is well sourced, neutral, and follows other Wikipedia guidelines and policies. |
Hello editors,
Back in November 2022, a tag was added to this article saying "This article may have been created or edited in return for undisclosed payments."
In recent months, I have been working with volunteer editors in cleaning up this article in a neutral way. If editors agree, I think it is time to reconsider whether this tag is needed anymore.
After some research, I found this tag was added due to a sockpuppet investigation of other editors that has since been closed. Since that time, this article has been updated significantly to be brought in line with Wikipedia's content rules. Because of this, I do not think this tag is necessary any longer and am suggesting that it be removed.
Thanks for the review. BasilAtTusk ( talk) 21:25, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
The user below has a request that an edit be made to
Bradley Tusk. That user has an
actual or apparent
conflict of interest. The requested edits backlog is high. Please be very patient. There are currently 168 requests waiting for review. Please read the instructions for the parameters used by this template for accepting and declining them, and review the request below and make the edit if it is well sourced, neutral, and follows other Wikipedia guidelines and policies. |
Hello, I have a suggestion for the Introduction to have it better reflect recent changes made to this article:
Thanks for your review BasilAtTusk ( talk) 21:25, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Archives: 1 |
|
The
Wikimedia Foundation's
Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
I added the {{ advert}} template the other day, the first line of which says, "This article contains content that is written like an advertisement." User:Sampol327 removed the template without making any changes to the article, stating in the edit summary, "Removed advert template as this issue appears to be resolved." This edit summary appears despite no changes having been made to the article itself since the time I added the template. Here's the problem with this article: 5-10 sentences in it sound like advertising copy and/or contain Wikipedia:Weasel words. One example is the article's third sentence, which says, "His family foundation, Tusk Philanthropies, is leading the effort to bring mobile voting to the United States." The problem with this sentence is the phrase "leading the effort". That phraseology is intended to cast a positive glow. It's not an encyclopedic way of writing. It also is not substantiated by the linked source. And, even if it were substantiated by the linked source, we would normally want multiple reliable sources to establish the notability of a claim like that. Instead of adding the template, I could just whip through the article and remove all the (5-10) sentences that are like that. Novellasyes ( talk) 18:43, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Nothing proven, but see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mbc16 for some background on this. Whilst there probably won't be any action taken on sockpuppetry since it wasn't always overlapping or currently ongoing, the admin did opine that it was likely that User:Mbc16, User:Sampol327, User:Bb510c1 and User:Pvt928c were the same person. Mako001 ( talk) 00:51, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
Anybody know what exactly the title "deputy governor" means in Illinois? I searched and couldn't really find anything official or authoritative to even prove that the office exists. Is it merely honorific? While there are plenty of sources backing up Tusk's position as "deputy governor," it certainly is not the same as the Lieutenant Governor of Illinois. Any help here would be appreciated. - Headphase ( talk) 03:26, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
I have a few proposed additions to make in this article. I used the "edit COI" template due to my employment with Bradley Tusk.
References
If there are any questions, please feel free to message me. BasilAtTusk ( talk) 23:31, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
References
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. The requested changes were not specific enough. |
Hi, Basil at Tusk here again with a few more proposed additions to make in this article. I used the "edit COI" template due to my employment with Bradley Tusk.
The proposed edits I have are in the current "Private sector" section. These changes include things like:
Here is the draft:
Private sector
After serving as Deputy Governor of Illinois, Tusk was hired as a senior vice president at
Lehman Brothers, where he created the lottery monetization group and headed all of its efforts regarding U.S. based lotteries.
[4] Combining his backgrounds in finance and politics, Tusk developed a successful framework to help states monetize their lotteries.
[5]
In 2015, Tusk ran a public affairs campaign for Uber that included television, radio, and digital ads as well as direct mail and grassroots organizing in opposition to a cap on rideshare vehicles proposed by New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio. [6] The campaign argued that "the company was good for the city, providing jobs and transportation for less affluent residents in the outer boroughs." [7] The bill was dropped before it reached a vote. [8] After the campaign's success in New York City, Tusk moved onto other places like Boston, Philadelphia, Chicago, Miami, Los Angeles, Denver and Washington D.C. [9] For his representation of Uber, Tusk was compensated with equity in the company estimated to be worth $100 million. [10] The experience also provided him with exposure to the world of venture capital, [11] and Tusk Ventures was launched two weeks after the New York City victory. [12]
He formed IG Acquisition Corp, [13] [14] a SPAC planning to acquire a business in the leisure, gaming and hospitality industries. [15]
Tusk Strategies
In 2011 Tusk founded Tusk Strategies, which is the first firm dedicated to helping startups navigate political issues and is based in New York City.
[16] The firm develops and runs campaigns for companies, including
Google,
Walmart,
AT&T,
Pepsi,
FanDuel,
[17] and institutions including
Stanford University, the
Rockefeller Foundation and
Texas A&M, and individuals including
Michael Bloomberg and
George Lucas.
[18]
Tusk Strategies also conducts issue advocacy campaigns around education reform and government; campaigns to help political candidates, non-profits and trade associations. [19]
Tusk Ventures
In 2015, Tusk launched Tusk Ventures Partners, a venture capital fund that invests in startups facing political and regulatory challenges or pursuing political and governmental opportunities. His work with startups began in 2011, when he worked with transportation startup
Uber, which was contesting with regulation proposed by the
Taxi and Limousine Commission (CE) of New York City.
[20]
Tusk Ventures has worked with over three dozen startups including Bird, FanDuel, Lemonade, Handy, Eaze, Nexar, Ripple, MainStreet, Nurx, Ro, Kodiak Robotics, and Care/Of, solving a variety of political, regulatory and media challenges solely in return for equity in each company and for investment rights in each company's next round of financing. [21] [22]
Tusk Venture Partners raised its first fund in 2016 and began deploying capital into startups including Lemonade, [23] Nexar, Care/Of, Circle, Coinbase, Bird, Ro and FanDuel. [24] [25]
References
{{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (
link)
{{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (
link)
If there are any questions, please feel free to message me. BasilAtTusk ( talk) 18:29, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Sample edit request
|
---|
|
Regards,
Spintendo 23:52, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
References
Instructions for Submitters: Describe the requested changes in detail. This includes the exact proposed wording of the new material, the exact proposed location for it, and an explicit description of any wording to be removed, including removal for any substitution.
Instructions for Submitters: If the rationale for a change is not obvious (particularly for proposed deletions), explain.
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Thanks Spintendo for the suggestions. Here is my modified request:
References
{{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (
link)
I am happy to answer any questions. Thanks BasilAtTusk ( talk) 16:50, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Edit request partially implemented
"a SPAC planning to acquire a business in the leisure, gaming and hospitality industries". Wikipedia does not usually speak about the future plans of subjects in their articles.
Regards, Spintendo 00:16, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
@ Spintendo: let me clarify as I may have misspoken previously. The info about IG Acquisition Corp is included in the introduction, but is not in the body of the article. The current sentence in the intro is exactly as I had proposed, "He is also the chairman of IG Acquisition Corp, [1] [2] a SPAC planning to acquire a business in the leisure, gaming and hospitality industries. [3]"
I originally proposed adding the sentence to Private sector because I thought the intro was supposed to be a summary of content found in the article. With that said, I think you're right. IG Acquisition Corp has ended and the sentence does include "future plans", so I'm now wondering if it's best to simply remove that sentence from the article's introduction. If you and others decide IG Acquisition Corp does belong in the article, it would be best to move it from the intro to the Private sector section. BasilAtTusk ( talk) 22:04, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
References
{{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (
link)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Hello, in my continuing effort to make this page better for all, I wanted to ask if editors would consider removing the red links to "Nexar", "GlamSquad", and "MainStreet" under the "Tusk Ventures" subsection. Since articles for Nexar and MainStreet have been deleted, and it's not clear if GlamSquad is yet notable for a Wikipedia article, those red links can be removed per Wikipedia:Red link.
Please let me know if there are any questions, BasilAtTusk ( talk) 20:36, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Hi all, it's Basil for Bradley Tusk here again.
I noticed the article has some information that should be included in the Infobox too, specifically Tusk's alma mater. Would edits be willing to add in this information per the Infobox person template?
My specific request is that editors add to the infobox his alma maters University of Pennsylvania [1] [2] and University of Chicago Law School [3] [2]. Two of the sources I included here are already cited in the body of the article to verify this information and I have additionally added the WSJ source, which also verifies it.
Let me know if there are any questions.
References
Tusk...is widely credited with spearheading the administration's most notable successes, such as broadly expanding medical insurance for children, and for effectively overseeing a massive proportion of the state's operations, including its $60 billion budget and its 57,000-person workforce.
Thanks BasilAtTusk ( talk) 20:23, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
Lewcm Talk to me! 23:16, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. Reasons why were not provided. |
Thanks very much Lewcm for making those Infobox updates! I have another suggestion, this time to the Illinois subsection:
This adds needed context to the situation that is covered in the reference cited in the article. Happy to review any questions you have! BasilAtTusk ( talk) 15:55, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
This change of phrasing (which has not been given a reason) obviously benefits the subject while not substantively changing the meaning. Without a bonafide reason why for the change, it cannot be made. [1]
References
Instructions for Submitters: If the rationale for a change is not obvious (particularly for proposed deletions), explain.
Regards, Spintendo 16:40, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. |
Thanks for the consideration BasilAtTusk ( talk) 18:28, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Part of an edit requested by an editor with a conflict of interest has been implemented. |
Hello editors, I wanted to propose some updates to the current Tusk Philanthropies section. This includes:
References
Please let me know if there are any questions. Thanks BasilAtTusk ( talk) 15:22, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
The services Tusk has backed so far are for development of internet-based voting.
Hope this is alright, if you have any other suggestions for this bit please let me know :) Thanks, Encoded Talk to me! 15:44, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Hello editors. I previously made a suggestion for this page which was denied by STEMinfo due to it being too "crystal ball"-y since the book I was suggesting be added was not yet published. Good news, the book has now been published! Since this no longer is a crystal ball scenario, I would like to re-request this addition:
References
His second book, Obvious in Hindsight, which was released to a handful of independent bookstores this week and will be more broadly available later this month
I'm happy to answer any questions. Thanks BasilAtTusk ( talk) 15:42, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
The user below has a request that an edit be made to
Bradley Tusk. That user has an
actual or apparent
conflict of interest. The requested edits backlog is high. Please be very patient. There are currently 168 requests waiting for review. Please read the instructions for the parameters used by this template for accepting and declining them, and review the request below and make the edit if it is well sourced, neutral, and follows other Wikipedia guidelines and policies. |
Hello editors, I have some proposed updates to the New York Subsection:
References
Thanks for the review BasilAtTusk ( talk) 15:40, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The user below has a request that an edit be made to
Bradley Tusk. That user has an
actual or apparent
conflict of interest. The requested edits backlog is high. Please be very patient. There are currently 168 requests waiting for review. Please read the instructions for the parameters used by this template for accepting and declining them, and review the request below and make the edit if it is well sourced, neutral, and follows other Wikipedia guidelines and policies. |
Hello editors,
Back in November 2022, a tag was added to this article saying "This article may have been created or edited in return for undisclosed payments."
In recent months, I have been working with volunteer editors in cleaning up this article in a neutral way. If editors agree, I think it is time to reconsider whether this tag is needed anymore.
After some research, I found this tag was added due to a sockpuppet investigation of other editors that has since been closed. Since that time, this article has been updated significantly to be brought in line with Wikipedia's content rules. Because of this, I do not think this tag is necessary any longer and am suggesting that it be removed.
Thanks for the review. BasilAtTusk ( talk) 21:25, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
The user below has a request that an edit be made to
Bradley Tusk. That user has an
actual or apparent
conflict of interest. The requested edits backlog is high. Please be very patient. There are currently 168 requests waiting for review. Please read the instructions for the parameters used by this template for accepting and declining them, and review the request below and make the edit if it is well sourced, neutral, and follows other Wikipedia guidelines and policies. |
Hello, I have a suggestion for the Introduction to have it better reflect recent changes made to this article:
Thanks for your review BasilAtTusk ( talk) 21:25, 20 March 2024 (UTC)