Reichian body-oriented psychotherapy was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 18 February 2020 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Body psychotherapy. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have taken issue with the fact that Body Psychotherapy isn't at all mentioned in the article about Psychotherapy. I posted a message about this on the talk page of that article. __ meco 12:53, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
I would add the excellent overview by Nick Totton in "Body Psychotherapy: An Introduction", 2003, ISBN 978-0335210398 Fbunny ( talk) 14:42, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
It appears to me that footnotes 1 and 2 are quite redundant at best, if not irrelevant. __ meco 21:42, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Currently it reads: Body Psychotherapy [1] (also known as Body-oriented psychotherapy or Somatic Psychology) is a branch of Psychotherapy with roots in the history of clinical psychology [2] and in the later work of Pierre Janet and Sigmund Freud. It is altogether unclear what is meant by "the history of clinical psychology" as this is portrayed here as something prior to and distinct from the appearance of Janet and Freud. The second footnote yields a quote that states ""Shock trauma, originally defined by Freud as a breaching of the protective stimulus barrier, can be differentiated from developmental trauma". This is a non-sequitor in my book (or rather a digression). __ meco 21:50, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
The result of the proposal was Move, should be uncontroversial, and yes, the category will have to goto CFD. Parsecboy ( talk) 13:50, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
I request this is moved to
Body psychotherapy, per
MOS:CAPS which says: "Philosophies, theories, doctrines, and systems of thought do not begin with a capital letter, unless the name derives from a proper noun"; see also discussion
here.
Category:Body Psychotherapy should also be moved, but I suppose that's a topic for
WP:CFD. /
skagedal
talk 14:22, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
But I don´t know how to edit the introduction. It says: " Reich worked and trained people in Berlin, Copenhagen and Oslo in the **1930a**." It was probably meant to be "1930´s".— Preceding unsigned comment added by Duckbeach ( talk • contribs) 21:47, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
The following appear to be "sources affiliated with the subject":
Overly-extensive use of them (and similar sources) should be avoided. The article should be mainly about what the general scientific and medical community thinks of Body psychotherapy, not what Body psychotherapists think about themselves. Hrafn Talk Stalk( P) 10:51, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
It looks like this article and Somatic psychology both deal with the same subject, and should therefore be merged into a single article. Not sure, though, which name should be used. Cgingold ( talk) 11:20, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
I just boldly added a bit more factual detail about the professional associations for body psychotherapists. I am thinking it is appropriate to have detail about these organisations even though it is from primary sources because it gives information about the size and longevity of this field of practice and study. I would probably suggest adding information about their conferences also - how many, over what time period etc. Is that a fair call? I also notice there is a separate article for one of the associations and it has a Notability template - maybe the organisations don't deserve their own article, but some simple facts in this article? What do others think? Also I would ideally like parity of information on each one i.e. founding date and member scope but I couldn't find that detail Depthdiver ( talk) 23:10, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Body psychotherapy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:43, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
Reichian body-oriented psychotherapy was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 18 February 2020 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Body psychotherapy. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have taken issue with the fact that Body Psychotherapy isn't at all mentioned in the article about Psychotherapy. I posted a message about this on the talk page of that article. __ meco 12:53, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
I would add the excellent overview by Nick Totton in "Body Psychotherapy: An Introduction", 2003, ISBN 978-0335210398 Fbunny ( talk) 14:42, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
It appears to me that footnotes 1 and 2 are quite redundant at best, if not irrelevant. __ meco 21:42, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Currently it reads: Body Psychotherapy [1] (also known as Body-oriented psychotherapy or Somatic Psychology) is a branch of Psychotherapy with roots in the history of clinical psychology [2] and in the later work of Pierre Janet and Sigmund Freud. It is altogether unclear what is meant by "the history of clinical psychology" as this is portrayed here as something prior to and distinct from the appearance of Janet and Freud. The second footnote yields a quote that states ""Shock trauma, originally defined by Freud as a breaching of the protective stimulus barrier, can be differentiated from developmental trauma". This is a non-sequitor in my book (or rather a digression). __ meco 21:50, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
The result of the proposal was Move, should be uncontroversial, and yes, the category will have to goto CFD. Parsecboy ( talk) 13:50, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
I request this is moved to
Body psychotherapy, per
MOS:CAPS which says: "Philosophies, theories, doctrines, and systems of thought do not begin with a capital letter, unless the name derives from a proper noun"; see also discussion
here.
Category:Body Psychotherapy should also be moved, but I suppose that's a topic for
WP:CFD. /
skagedal
talk 14:22, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
But I don´t know how to edit the introduction. It says: " Reich worked and trained people in Berlin, Copenhagen and Oslo in the **1930a**." It was probably meant to be "1930´s".— Preceding unsigned comment added by Duckbeach ( talk • contribs) 21:47, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
The following appear to be "sources affiliated with the subject":
Overly-extensive use of them (and similar sources) should be avoided. The article should be mainly about what the general scientific and medical community thinks of Body psychotherapy, not what Body psychotherapists think about themselves. Hrafn Talk Stalk( P) 10:51, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
It looks like this article and Somatic psychology both deal with the same subject, and should therefore be merged into a single article. Not sure, though, which name should be used. Cgingold ( talk) 11:20, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
I just boldly added a bit more factual detail about the professional associations for body psychotherapists. I am thinking it is appropriate to have detail about these organisations even though it is from primary sources because it gives information about the size and longevity of this field of practice and study. I would probably suggest adding information about their conferences also - how many, over what time period etc. Is that a fair call? I also notice there is a separate article for one of the associations and it has a Notability template - maybe the organisations don't deserve their own article, but some simple facts in this article? What do others think? Also I would ideally like parity of information on each one i.e. founding date and member scope but I couldn't find that detail Depthdiver ( talk) 23:10, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Body psychotherapy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:43, 5 November 2016 (UTC)