This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 6 September 2019 and 12 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jingw99.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 15:55, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Is it always served hot? This should be added to the article. Badagnani 21:37, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
In regard to this edit, in the future kindly discuss prior to guessing and reverting many times, when requested. It's much more productive to do so. We are an encyclopedia and we should not base our Chinese readings on guesses, but instead on sources and collaborative discussion, with the correct information emerging through the careful analysis of the evidence. Badagnani ( talk) 20:03, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
Kindly moderate your tone. We are an encyclopedia and, as such, our position as editors is one of great responsibility. Thus, we should verify our information via careful, collegial discussion when naming a page or verifying a pronunciaton. We cannot risk that our credibility as an encyclopedia be questioned. Also importantly, when requested by another long-time editor to discuss a particular point, please do so. Badagnani ( talk) 20:37, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
Kindly moderate your tone. David Oei's name is clearly pronounced "Wee" on widely available LP recordings, and the subject of the article also verified this per WP:BLP. In classical music circles the pronunciation of his name is widely known, as he is one of the most prominent American concert pianists. His family originates in Amoy ( Xiamen) and that is the way they pronounce it (or at least the closest English approximation to their reading of that surname). The substitution of fourth tone for second tone at Black sesame soup was clearly incorrect, which was the reason for questioning that particular reading. The correct tone, as deteremined by checking sources, was fifth tone. This was determined through careful and collegial discussion and examination of sources, as it should have been, but only after many insistent and repeated reversions replacing the wrong tone again and again (which should not have taken place). Badagnani ( talk) 20:38, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
Discrimination is against Wikipedia's ideals, and I do not engage in it. We can all work together to make this the best encyclopedia possible. It really is an important task, and should be done with the greatest seriousness and togetherness. Let's work together to do that, on this and every other article, utilizing discussion and comparing notes as requested and necessary. This process really works well. Badagnani ( talk) 21:09, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
Why would you revert based on a guess rather than discussing and analyzing evidence. The Unihan Database says it's fifth tone. Please take a look at the source, and restore it to fifth tone. Thanks for this. Badagnani ( talk) 23:24, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
The quality of this article is clearly substandard according to wikipedia's guidelines. Requires cleanup for poor grammar, bad sources, and unverified facts. Payppp ( talk) 20:22, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 6 September 2019 and 12 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jingw99.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 15:55, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Is it always served hot? This should be added to the article. Badagnani 21:37, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
In regard to this edit, in the future kindly discuss prior to guessing and reverting many times, when requested. It's much more productive to do so. We are an encyclopedia and we should not base our Chinese readings on guesses, but instead on sources and collaborative discussion, with the correct information emerging through the careful analysis of the evidence. Badagnani ( talk) 20:03, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
Kindly moderate your tone. We are an encyclopedia and, as such, our position as editors is one of great responsibility. Thus, we should verify our information via careful, collegial discussion when naming a page or verifying a pronunciaton. We cannot risk that our credibility as an encyclopedia be questioned. Also importantly, when requested by another long-time editor to discuss a particular point, please do so. Badagnani ( talk) 20:37, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
Kindly moderate your tone. David Oei's name is clearly pronounced "Wee" on widely available LP recordings, and the subject of the article also verified this per WP:BLP. In classical music circles the pronunciation of his name is widely known, as he is one of the most prominent American concert pianists. His family originates in Amoy ( Xiamen) and that is the way they pronounce it (or at least the closest English approximation to their reading of that surname). The substitution of fourth tone for second tone at Black sesame soup was clearly incorrect, which was the reason for questioning that particular reading. The correct tone, as deteremined by checking sources, was fifth tone. This was determined through careful and collegial discussion and examination of sources, as it should have been, but only after many insistent and repeated reversions replacing the wrong tone again and again (which should not have taken place). Badagnani ( talk) 20:38, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
Discrimination is against Wikipedia's ideals, and I do not engage in it. We can all work together to make this the best encyclopedia possible. It really is an important task, and should be done with the greatest seriousness and togetherness. Let's work together to do that, on this and every other article, utilizing discussion and comparing notes as requested and necessary. This process really works well. Badagnani ( talk) 21:09, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
Why would you revert based on a guess rather than discussing and analyzing evidence. The Unihan Database says it's fifth tone. Please take a look at the source, and restore it to fifth tone. Thanks for this. Badagnani ( talk) 23:24, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
The quality of this article is clearly substandard according to wikipedia's guidelines. Requires cleanup for poor grammar, bad sources, and unverified facts. Payppp ( talk) 20:22, 15 September 2013 (UTC)