This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Aviation: Aircraft This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion not met This article is supported by the aircraft project. Military history: Aviation / North America / United States This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion not met Associated task forces: /  Military aviation task force North American military history task force United States military history task force

I added the tags regarding wikifying, citing sources, and NPOV. There is a good deal of interesting information in this article, but right now it seems to be a collection of anecdotes and information copied from somewhere else. Regarding NPOV, there seems to be a lot of normative statements about these system being "good" or "bad" instead of "effective" or "ineffective" and describing why (obviously within the reasonable bounds that military classification allows). I would be happy to help clean this up, just let me know where this information came from. Madcoverboy 14:21, 18 July 2006 (UTC) reply

tags have been replaced, as this is a section of a larger article that is undergoing serious rewriting and slimming down. See talk page of History of unmanned aerial vehicles for details Akradecki 19:06, 9 August 2006 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battlefield UAVs of the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110902194407/http://www.vectorsite.net/twuav.html to http://www.vectorsite.net/twuav.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{ Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:03, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply