This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I'm a fan of brevity. And I'm not a fan of edit wars.
Nor am I, frankly, a fan of reversion. When you revert an edit, you're saying "There was nothing of value whatsoever in your edit." It's an insult, and every editor who has a good-faith edit reverted (especially without an adequate and respectful explanation) has every right in the world to feel insulted. Almost every good-faith edit that gets reverted should have been built upon, instead.
When an editor reverts a good-faith edit described in the Edit Summary as Part 2: There was no explanation for the Joker's body burning. Let's face facts: Batman rigged the corpse to explode as an attack (only PART of an attack, in fact) on the GCPD officers., an edit designed to correct this problem, that editor's integrity is called into question. The Batman rigged Joker's body to explode, for the purpose of attacking cops. This should be known. A passing reference to "as the Joker's body burns" is uninformative, bewildering nonsense.
When an editor reverts not one but two good-faith edits in one fell swoop, with the same under-informative explanation, it is not only his integrity, but his overall value as a Wikipedia editor entirely, that is called into question.
I am re-integrating some (as in, "not all") of the material from my two good-faith edits which were reverted with inadequate explanation by User: Darkwarriorblake (Dude, why not just call yourself "Robin"? There's nothing inherently un-cool about Robin.) It is my intention to improve the article, as always, and I believe it probably will. I also believe a majority of editors will agree that it does.
With that in mind, please comment! I seek consensus.
--05:01, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
First of all, Robin does not suck -- not to the extent that you do, at least.
Secondly, as I mentioned elsewhere, you cannot bring the roof of a large structure down with C4 or whatever plastique he uses, and not kill ordinary, non-meta-humans.
Thirdly -- and I'm sure you'll say this is unrelated -- but when this Batman, this VERY Batman from "Universe 33" or whatever the "Millerverse" is -- THIS Batman "wasted a whole pile of cops" while abducting Dick Grayson from police custody. (He also nearly killed his girlfriend, just to show how "tuff" he was.) Again, same Batman, just slightly younger then. I don't see why his cop-killing habits would change. Do you?
I may be over-relying on the book rather than the video. I'll admit that. Right now I'm looking at a panel featuring the first cop to touch the Joker's rigged body. The poor dude is ENGULFED in FLAME! Even if it didn't kill him, sure had to fuck up his life, didn't it? and this is before Batman drops the whole building on everyone.
I feel like I'm talking to someone who's clinging to "Batman doesn't kill" the way an eight-year-old, who secretly knows better, might insist "Santa Claus IS real! He just has to be!"
I also have no idea what "door" you refer to. It's a tunnel. [I get it now! -- Ben Culture ( talk) 01:22, 5 September 2013 (UTC)]
-- Ben Culture ( talk) 19:58, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I'm a fan of brevity. And I'm not a fan of edit wars.
Nor am I, frankly, a fan of reversion. When you revert an edit, you're saying "There was nothing of value whatsoever in your edit." It's an insult, and every editor who has a good-faith edit reverted (especially without an adequate and respectful explanation) has every right in the world to feel insulted. Almost every good-faith edit that gets reverted should have been built upon, instead.
When an editor reverts a good-faith edit described in the Edit Summary as Part 2: There was no explanation for the Joker's body burning. Let's face facts: Batman rigged the corpse to explode as an attack (only PART of an attack, in fact) on the GCPD officers., an edit designed to correct this problem, that editor's integrity is called into question. The Batman rigged Joker's body to explode, for the purpose of attacking cops. This should be known. A passing reference to "as the Joker's body burns" is uninformative, bewildering nonsense.
When an editor reverts not one but two good-faith edits in one fell swoop, with the same under-informative explanation, it is not only his integrity, but his overall value as a Wikipedia editor entirely, that is called into question.
I am re-integrating some (as in, "not all") of the material from my two good-faith edits which were reverted with inadequate explanation by User: Darkwarriorblake (Dude, why not just call yourself "Robin"? There's nothing inherently un-cool about Robin.) It is my intention to improve the article, as always, and I believe it probably will. I also believe a majority of editors will agree that it does.
With that in mind, please comment! I seek consensus.
--05:01, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
First of all, Robin does not suck -- not to the extent that you do, at least.
Secondly, as I mentioned elsewhere, you cannot bring the roof of a large structure down with C4 or whatever plastique he uses, and not kill ordinary, non-meta-humans.
Thirdly -- and I'm sure you'll say this is unrelated -- but when this Batman, this VERY Batman from "Universe 33" or whatever the "Millerverse" is -- THIS Batman "wasted a whole pile of cops" while abducting Dick Grayson from police custody. (He also nearly killed his girlfriend, just to show how "tuff" he was.) Again, same Batman, just slightly younger then. I don't see why his cop-killing habits would change. Do you?
I may be over-relying on the book rather than the video. I'll admit that. Right now I'm looking at a panel featuring the first cop to touch the Joker's rigged body. The poor dude is ENGULFED in FLAME! Even if it didn't kill him, sure had to fuck up his life, didn't it? and this is before Batman drops the whole building on everyone.
I feel like I'm talking to someone who's clinging to "Batman doesn't kill" the way an eight-year-old, who secretly knows better, might insist "Santa Claus IS real! He just has to be!"
I also have no idea what "door" you refer to. It's a tunnel. [I get it now! -- Ben Culture ( talk) 01:22, 5 September 2013 (UTC)]
-- Ben Culture ( talk) 19:58, 2 September 2013 (UTC)