This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Asia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Asia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject AsiaTemplate:WikiProject AsiaAsia articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article was created or improved during WikiProject Asia's " Asian 10,000 Challenge", which started in October 2016 and is still continuing. You can help! Politics: Political parties Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Political parties task force. Korea Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Universal Basic Income ( inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Universal Basic Income, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Universal Basic IncomeWikipedia:WikiProject Universal Basic IncomeTemplate:WikiProject Basic IncomeUniversal Basic Income articles

I believe this assessment is wrong. While both Lee Jae-myeong and the Basic Income Party share the goal of achieving universal basic income, the BIP has often times criticized Lee Jae-myeong and his plan for basic income.

The article linked in question shows Lee Jae-myeong attending the creation ceremony of the BIP. Politicians in Korea attend launch ceremonies of minor parties all the time. This does not mean that the Basic Income Party supports Lee Jae-myeong, or vice-versa. Lee only attended the launch ceremony of the Party. In fact, the Basic Income Party has directly ran candidates AGAINT Lee Jae-myeong and his closest allies, such as the 2022 South Korean presidential election.

In fact, President of the Basic Income Party, Yong Hye-in, in this article, criticizes Lee Jae-myeong's basic income policy.

During the 2022 Presidential Election, BIP candidate Oh Jun-ho said Lee Jae-myeong's basic income scheme was " disappointing." Elg3a-1 ( talk) 04:49, 13 October 2022 (UTC) reply

@ Braganza can you explain split rationale? When you make split requests you should attach rationale, otherwise how can anyone debate it? toobigtokale ( talk) 03:42, 28 March 2024 (UTC) reply

I want to split it because its a de facto coalition and not just a rebrand Braganza ( talk) 05:54, 28 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Oppose, as it would make more sense for the New Progressive Alliance to be discussed as a party rebrand for the 2024 South Korean legislative election. While it is true that other parties joined the rebrand to form a de facto coalition, from a legal viewpoint, the Basic Income Party is the exact same party as the New Progressive Alliance. Furthermore, the New Progressive Alliance is already covered as being a part of the Democratic Alliance of Korea, which already has a separate article. MogasTheThird ( talk) 13:03, 5 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Oppose. New Progressive Alliance is the Basic Income Party. Legally, these are the same entities. It is just a rename of the Party due to South Korea's election law prohibiting electoral alliances. This same user requested the same thing on the Green-Justice Talk Page. Please read a little more on the election law and how parties deal with certain issues surrounding this. They did not form a whole separate legal entity. The Democratic Alliance of Korea did form a brand new party from scratch, but speedran the creation process due to having 14 sitting members of parliament signed on to join the new Party. Elg3a-1 ( talk) 04:05, 8 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Oppose. As both Braganza and Elg3a-1 points out, it is just a rename of the Party. Random123games ( talk) 06:07, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

According to the results section of the 2024 South Korean legislative election page the New Progressive Alliance won 2 seats. Which of the parties in the New Progressive Alliance (the Basic Income Party, the Open Democratic Party or the Social Democratic Party) now have a seat or seats? Helper201 ( talk) 21:02, 11 April 2024 (UTC) reply

The two candidates who won were Yong Hye-in, originally from Basic Income, and Han Chang-min from the Social Democratic Party. It is safe to say once the lawmakers take their seat in May and the Democratic Party absorbs Democratic Alliance, these two will return to their original parties. Elg3a-1 ( talk) 04:33, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply