This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Sociology High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Books This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles This article has been marked as needing an infobox. It is requested that a picture or pictures be included in this article to improve its quality.

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 13:30, 9 November 2007 (UTC) reply

The article should be deleted. a.) It is factually wrong, already its title is wrong---and that is hard to achieve. Soziologische Grundbegriffe (Basic Sociological Terms (G. Roth et al.) / Fundamental Concepts of Sociology (T. Parsons)) is not a book, it is the first chapter of the first part (the part prepared for publication by Weber himself, in contrast to the second, posthumous part) of the body of work now known as "Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft" (Economy and Society). Btw, the first English translation of that first part is Parsons 1947. b.) The table of contents offered here is completely messed up. It doesn't agree at all with the TOC of the German original. c.) The article is unsourced. The external link (most likely to a bad translation with a botched TOC) is broken.-- TheseusX ( talk) 18:45, 28 February 2013 (UTC) [Edit: On account of a.) the assessment of the importance of the article is probably incorrect as well] -- TheseusX ( talk) 18:50, 28 February 2013 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Basic Concepts in Sociology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040620154802/http://www.ne.jp:80/asahi/moriyuki/abukuma/weber/method/basic/basic_concept_frame.html to http://www.ne.jp/asahi/moriyuki/abukuma/weber/method/basic/basic_concept_frame.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{ Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:00, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply