This is the
talk page of a
redirect that targets the page: • Family Guy season 6 Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:Family Guy season 6 |
Back to the Woods (Family Guy) was nominated as a Media and drama good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (November 24, 2012). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
Some sources say that this episode involves James Woods stealing Peter's identity and Peter attempting to ruin his career. Other sources say that James Woods tries to kill Peter (and Brian), prompting the Griffins to run for their lives. Never until this article have I seen these summaries together. My point is that until the episode airs, there is no way of knowing if both of these occurances will appear in this episode and, if so, when they will occur; in other words, we must rely on the official sources to get an idea of what the episode will be about before it airs. Immblueversion ( talk) 16:58, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
It was revealed on the site Spoiler TV that James Woods steals his identity and family after finding Peter's wallet, which was lost at a Barry Manilow concert. Also, Manilow guest stars as himself. Immblueversion ( talk) 21:59, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
That maybe, but I would stick to the FOX press release. There the ones airing the show. But, the again, who knows Toolazy21 ( talk) 17:00, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Image:FGBackToTheWoods.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 20:52, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Isn't it the same as the Postal teaser?-- Svetovid ( talk) 16:52, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
The Fox promos for the next showing of this episode are saying that there will be "never-befor-seen footage." And Adult Swim hasn't aired this episode, but they did air Play it Again, Brian, the episode after this one. Am I the only one who finds this strange? I understand taking stuff out for PC reasons after the episode aired (taking out the Twin Towers out of the "You've Got a lot to See" musical number), but puting stuff in? Are they airing the Adult Swim version for some unknown reason? Or did Seth Mac and the other staff diddn't exactly finish their editing job, and they went back and fixed it up? Any thoughts?-- BrianGriffin-FG ( talk) 23:42, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Shouldn't we mention that this episode was originaly suppused to air during the srike, but it ended, so the producers were able to edit it, and it was the first episode to air after the strike?-- BrianGriffin-FG ( talk) 18:53, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: TBrandley ( talk · contribs) 06:08, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
As of right now, this article fails short of the good article criteria. In order for this article to pass the criteria, some big changes need to be made for broad coverage, WP:MOS issues, and the article's prose. In any case, you have seven days to fix all of my concerns, and I'll take another look after. Thus, I am placing the article on hold, despite the above. TBr and ley 18:54, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
It has been seven days and no issues have been addressed, and therefore I am failing this nomination. TBr and ley 13:58, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
This is the
talk page of a
redirect that targets the page: • Family Guy season 6 Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:Family Guy season 6 |
Back to the Woods (Family Guy) was nominated as a Media and drama good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (November 24, 2012). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
Some sources say that this episode involves James Woods stealing Peter's identity and Peter attempting to ruin his career. Other sources say that James Woods tries to kill Peter (and Brian), prompting the Griffins to run for their lives. Never until this article have I seen these summaries together. My point is that until the episode airs, there is no way of knowing if both of these occurances will appear in this episode and, if so, when they will occur; in other words, we must rely on the official sources to get an idea of what the episode will be about before it airs. Immblueversion ( talk) 16:58, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
It was revealed on the site Spoiler TV that James Woods steals his identity and family after finding Peter's wallet, which was lost at a Barry Manilow concert. Also, Manilow guest stars as himself. Immblueversion ( talk) 21:59, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
That maybe, but I would stick to the FOX press release. There the ones airing the show. But, the again, who knows Toolazy21 ( talk) 17:00, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Image:FGBackToTheWoods.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 20:52, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Isn't it the same as the Postal teaser?-- Svetovid ( talk) 16:52, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
The Fox promos for the next showing of this episode are saying that there will be "never-befor-seen footage." And Adult Swim hasn't aired this episode, but they did air Play it Again, Brian, the episode after this one. Am I the only one who finds this strange? I understand taking stuff out for PC reasons after the episode aired (taking out the Twin Towers out of the "You've Got a lot to See" musical number), but puting stuff in? Are they airing the Adult Swim version for some unknown reason? Or did Seth Mac and the other staff diddn't exactly finish their editing job, and they went back and fixed it up? Any thoughts?-- BrianGriffin-FG ( talk) 23:42, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Shouldn't we mention that this episode was originaly suppused to air during the srike, but it ended, so the producers were able to edit it, and it was the first episode to air after the strike?-- BrianGriffin-FG ( talk) 18:53, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: TBrandley ( talk · contribs) 06:08, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
As of right now, this article fails short of the good article criteria. In order for this article to pass the criteria, some big changes need to be made for broad coverage, WP:MOS issues, and the article's prose. In any case, you have seven days to fix all of my concerns, and I'll take another look after. Thus, I am placing the article on hold, despite the above. TBr and ley 18:54, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
It has been seven days and no issues have been addressed, and therefore I am failing this nomination. TBr and ley 13:58, 24 November 2012 (UTC)