Béla III of Hungary has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result January 22, 2015 Good article nominee Listed
	A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the " Did you know?" column on February 11, 2015. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the future Béla III of Hungary was for a time the chosen successor of Byzantine emperor Manuel I Komnenos, who created the title despotes for him?
	A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the " On this day..." column on April 23, 2020.

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Royalty and Nobility This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility. Bosnia and Herzegovina High‑importance Béla III of Hungary is part of the WikiProject Bosnia and Herzegovina, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Bosnia and Herzegovina on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Bosnia and HerzegovinaWikipedia:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaTemplate:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaBosnia and Herzegovina articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Croatia High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Hungary High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hungary, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hungary on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HungaryWikipedia:WikiProject HungaryTemplate:WikiProject HungaryHungary articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Middle Ages High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Greece: Byzantine This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Byzantine world task force.

Did he ever call himself "Belo"? but if the alternate names in his subjects' languages are named, then why not Adalbert, the German form, used by many of his ethnic German subjects. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.70.38.242 ( talk) 01:17, 4 July 2008 (UTC) reply

The article says he was granted a duchy by his mother but her article doesn't mention it. On the other hand, the article on his father says that prior to the father's death, he granted an appanage duchy to his son Béla. In that case it appears that the wrong parent is credited in this article. Mikenlesley ( talk) 04:23, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Thank you for your message. I fixed the problem. Borsoka ( talk) 05:07, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply

This review is transcluded from Talk:Béla III of Hungary/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: 3family6 ( talk · contribs) 04:14, 15 January 2015 (UTC) reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose is " clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

   No copyvios detected, just some Wikipedia mirrors.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me | See what I have done) 20:48, 17 January 2015 (UTC) reply

   High quality, polished prose.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me | See what I have done) 04:37, 22 January 2015 (UTC) reply

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

   Follow MOS.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me | See what I have done) 04:37, 22 January 2015 (UTC) reply

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   Well formatted reference sections provided.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me | See what I have done) 04:37, 22 January 2015 (UTC) reply

   B. Citations to reliable sources, where necessary:

   If anything, the article is over-cited.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me | See what I have done) 04:37, 22 January 2015 (UTC) reply

   C. No original research:

   All content is verifiable and attributable to sources.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me | See what I have done) 04:37, 22 January 2015 (UTC) reply

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   Sticks to major aspects.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me | See what I have done) 04:37, 22 January 2015 (UTC) reply

   B. Focused:

   Focused on subject, no extraneous material.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me | See what I have done) 04:37, 22 January 2015 (UTC) reply

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

   Neutral, balanced discussion, with differing historical perspectives provided where appropriate.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me | See what I have done) 04:37, 22 January 2015 (UTC) reply

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

   No instances of edit warring, vandalism, or other disruption since this article was created in 2003.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me | See what I have done) 20:48, 17 January 2015 (UTC) reply

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   All licensing checks out. I took the liberty of filling out a few parameters on some images.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me | See what I have done) 20:48, 17 January 2015 (UTC) reply

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

   Images are useful, relevant, and have appropriate captions.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me | See what I have done) 20:48, 17 January 2015 (UTC) reply

7. Overall: An excellent article, ready for FAC in my opinion.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me | See what I have done) 04:37, 22 January 2015 (UTC) reply

   Pass or Fail:

When did Manuel conquer Bosnia, Dalmatia and Syrmia? The article about Manuel I Komnenos (FA) suggests 1167, but this article (GA) says 1165. Surtsicna ( talk) 13:39, 13 February 2022 (UTC) reply

This article does not say that Manuel conquered these provinces in 1165. The article says that Manuel seized the provinces by bringing Béla/Alexios (the ruler of the three provinces) to his court in 1163. Afterwards, Béla's brother, Stephen III made several attempts to reconquer the three provinces. Borsoka ( talk) 15:13, 13 February 2022 (UTC) reply